Molte donne vengono brutalmente assassinate. Diventa subito evidente che tutte le vittime sono collegate a una donna che aveva avuto relazioni illecite con loro.Molte donne vengono brutalmente assassinate. Diventa subito evidente che tutte le vittime sono collegate a una donna che aveva avuto relazioni illecite con loro.Molte donne vengono brutalmente assassinate. Diventa subito evidente che tutte le vittime sono collegate a una donna che aveva avuto relazioni illecite con loro.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Anna
- (as Pier Anna Quaia)
- Mario the coiffeur
- (as Giovanni Brusatori)
Recensioni in evidenza
This is certainly one of the least impressive examples of the Italian giallo that I have seen. It was directed by Tano Cimorosa, who also plays the diminutive detective with the 'tache. Cimorosa will be familiar to a lot of you from his memorable appearance in Renato Polselli's brutally sleazy giallo Delirium (1972). Well this movie sure has its fair share of sleaze as well but it's a much less entertaining affair. On the one hand it certainly contains many of the giallo conventions such as a convoluted mystery, violent murders and a healthy amount of nudity; on the other hand it completely lacks any sense of style. As a result it merely comes off as rough edged and at best semi-interesting. It stars giallo regulars such as Dagmar Lassander and Giacomo Rossi-Stuart but they aren't really given a lot to do.
It should be pointed out that the copy I saw was pan and scan and 72 minutes, with poor sound. Perhaps if I saw it in a better version my opinion would improve, as I do believe that there is a 90 minute cut out there. But my main feeling is that the basic ingredients of this one are not terrific no matter the version.
Director Tano Cimarosa seems keen to keep the focus on sleaze and savagery throughout, and if we're not witnessing a woman being slashed open with a razor blade, we're watching two of them getting it on. Normally, a film like this would get a high rating from me; but because the cinematography is so painful, none of it is pleasing to the eye and that ensures that it's all rather uninspiring. The cast features two recognisable names, those belonging to John Richardson, the star of a number of Italian films including Bava's Black Sunday and Lenzi's Eyeball, and Dagmar Lassander; who also appears on a number of cult cast lists. Neither really has room to impress here. Despite putting more focus on sleaze, the plot is actually quite complicated; and is made more so by the fact that all the characters are wafer thin and it can be difficult to work out their motives because of that. The ending doesn't come as much of a surprise, although I wasn't really expecting it to. Overall, Reflections in Black really isn't a good film; but I hesitate to completely condemn it as it's a great exercise in crappy film-making, and it does at least do some of the things that you want a Giallo to do.
Yep, the killer has black gloves and an open razor, the victims are young and often naked ladies, and there's loads and loads of nudity to keep you awake between the interminable police investigation scenes. The main focus seems to be mainly on John Richardson the policeman and his sidekick, who suspiciously is played by director/actor Gaetano. There's also a keen rookie cop and his girlfriend that clog up the investigation side of things too, and bulk out the plot.
As usual a photograph is a main plot point, there's a few effective stalking scenes, but even the rampant nudity couldn't really carry this one all the way through. They didn't give Giacomo Rossi-Stuart enough screen time either.
Overall it's not actually bad, it's just not good either and has no atmosphere whatsoever which is unfortunate in a giallo film. But it's better than I originally thought.
A lady in black (close shot on the black hose she wears)kills several young ladies (wearing undies, as usual) with no apparent motive (oh, really?). Except that the ladies are all related to a picture on which they appear altogether. The detective( John Richardson)penetrates the world of a very rich family where everything seems to be, well...mysterious.
Oh well, very usual indeed. Vice always finds home in the italian haute-bourgeoisie, loads of lesbian scenes & female nudity, and murders scenes piling up in a very tired way (all razors except one strangulation). The resolution is completely absurd (and the explanation of the sole survivor is utterly funny as she doesn't seem to be convinced of what she says).
The director has no sense of rythmn (essential in that genre) and lacks of strength when it comes to direct. The actors are like robots doing their thing over and over, lead by british actor John Richardson (and genre veteran)who was on the decline of his career.
The suspense does work anyway and for those who know the Giallo tricks, it's nevertheless obvious who's doing what. The director although tries to give a different tone (a comic one) with John Rochardson's sidekick, as if he wasn't interested in the suspense : that's why maybe the murders scenes are so mechanical and uninteresting.
For genre lovers only, IL VIZIO HA LE CALZE NERE has very few appeal on all levels even though the version I've seen is a 71 mn running time and appears to be heavily cut.
has been shot in Techniscope 2.35:1. Watch out for the horrible pan and scan version
Superwonderscope says : 4
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhen the cultured but assumedly heterosexual dress designer happens to employ the French phrase "mise en scene" to "set the scene" for his testimony, Sgt. Panto, who just assumes all designers and hairdressers are automatically gay [he's previously insinuated that the couturier wears his own wares, and later professes the belief that the guy's a "fag"], on a hunch it must be something subversive and immoral, mimics back "mise en shame", so as to indicate, wrongly, that he knows it's pervy code for a proposition to commit some sort of disgusting same-sex act.
- BlooperWhen the cultured but assumedly heterosexual dress designer happens to employ the French phrase "mise en scene" to "set the scene" for his testimony, Sgt. Panto, who just assumes all designers and hairdressers are automatically gay [he's previously insinuated that the couturier wears his own wares, and later professes the belief that the guy's a "fag"], on a hunch it must be something subversive and immoral, mimics back "mise en shame", so as to indicate, wrongly, that he knows it's pervy code for a proposition to commit some sort of disgusting same-sex act.
- Citazioni
Dressmaker: Our work requires a certain "mise en scene." ... Do you understand Sergeant?
Sgt. Pantò: Well,,, I try ... So I wanted to ask you if you ever dressed as a woman?
Dressmaker: Me, dress as a woman? Why would I?
[Panto stutters, trying to avoid an indelicate or explicit response]
Dressmaker: Mise en scene?
Sgt. Pantò: [cutting him off, relieved he didn't have to say it first] "Mise en shame!" Exactly!