Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA 17-year-old high-school senior must justify her wedding to a 24-year-old law student to both her parents and her unbalanced ex-boyfriend.A 17-year-old high-school senior must justify her wedding to a 24-year-old law student to both her parents and her unbalanced ex-boyfriend.A 17-year-old high-school senior must justify her wedding to a 24-year-old law student to both her parents and her unbalanced ex-boyfriend.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Ron Foster
- Steve
- (as Ronald Foster)
Frank Biro
- Mr. Lewis
- (as Barney Biro)
Dick Gering
- Richie
- (as Richard Gering)
Elvera Corona
- Dancer
- (as Elvira Corona)
Allan Lurie
- Tony
- (as Al Laurie)
Recensioni in evidenza
Sure there are things that could be stronger, and Steve seems a little bit too old and smart to have picked at 17 y.o. high school student of questionable achievement for a wife (although I guess that in itself should give question to his intelligence), but the film does really capture some of the difficulties of new marriage, and there are a couple of decent songs. There are some sensible people in the story, too, especially viewed through a 1950s lens, but I wish there had been more realistic high school girls, both sugary ones and snotty ones, dealing with Judy's changed status. There's also some pretty good tension due to the constant harassment from the skeevy ex-boyfriend Chuck, which was a bit of a surprise. Anyway, while I didn't find it the most entertaining thing in the world, it was an okay piece of film making. It's hard to understand how Chuck's girlfriend puts up with him, though; I would totally dump his trouble-making ass.
Although the makers of "The Diary of a High School Bride" make the film seem like an exploitation film about young brides when it begins, the film is far less than you might expect. Plus, back in 1959, folks getting married at 17 wasn't all that unusual.
The film begins with Steve and Judy having just eloped. She is only 17 and so technically the marriage isn't legal. However, when Judy's parents hear about it, her father (with some objections from the mother) decides that the best thing to do is just accept it. Plus, he figures his daughter will soon come to her senses. However, the big problem with the marriage comes from some punks at Judy's high school (she is a Senior). They think it's funny to harass them and some of their 'pranks' get amazingly dangerous. However, Chuck's actions soon intensify, as he decides he's going to have sex with Judy whether she's willing or not! So, instead of a drama about teen marriages, it's more a film about rape. And, as such, it's actually not bad and responsibly done. Worth a look.
By the way, if you are interested, Judy (Anita Sands) was about 18-19 when she made the film and Steve (Ron Foster) was 28-29. To me, this huge age gap was a lot creepier than having Sands play a 17 year-old.
The film begins with Steve and Judy having just eloped. She is only 17 and so technically the marriage isn't legal. However, when Judy's parents hear about it, her father (with some objections from the mother) decides that the best thing to do is just accept it. Plus, he figures his daughter will soon come to her senses. However, the big problem with the marriage comes from some punks at Judy's high school (she is a Senior). They think it's funny to harass them and some of their 'pranks' get amazingly dangerous. However, Chuck's actions soon intensify, as he decides he's going to have sex with Judy whether she's willing or not! So, instead of a drama about teen marriages, it's more a film about rape. And, as such, it's actually not bad and responsibly done. Worth a look.
By the way, if you are interested, Judy (Anita Sands) was about 18-19 when she made the film and Steve (Ron Foster) was 28-29. To me, this huge age gap was a lot creepier than having Sands play a 17 year-old.
Cute as a button Anita Sands dumps high school beau Chris Robinson to marry law school student Ron Foster. Robinson doesn't take it well. Neither do her parents.
It's not a bad second feature from AIP, which seems to have some opinion that it's not the best idea for boys and girls to drop out of school to get married. Even if it works out, it requires work and maturity, which none of these crazy kids have got. I can't tell whether it's the actors, the script, or directors, but everyone seems a bit shallow and flat here; that may be my age talking. Surely the kids who necked to this in theaters didn't care.
It's not a bad second feature from AIP, which seems to have some opinion that it's not the best idea for boys and girls to drop out of school to get married. Even if it works out, it requires work and maturity, which none of these crazy kids have got. I can't tell whether it's the actors, the script, or directors, but everyone seems a bit shallow and flat here; that may be my age talking. Surely the kids who necked to this in theaters didn't care.
This 1959 picture starts with a disclaimer stating, "Teenage marriage is one of today's most controversial subjects. The producers do not attempt to present a solution or take sides..."
The producers also take no sides, or seemingly have an issue, with a 24 year old man marrying a 17 year old girl.
Instead, they take the controversial topic and turn it into a pulpy melodrama aimed at the teenage drive-in theatre audience of the times.
Some of the film's elements border on the surreal. Take the beatnik coffee shop that doubles as a flamenco lounge. Or one of the establishment's customers who tunes out the live music, and the world around him, by hearing music from his transistor radio through ear "buds." Or, how about the 17-year old constantly cuddling her stuffed toy dog to symbolize her youth. On her wedding night the camera tilts down from her kissing her husband to her hand dropping the pooch and lingers on her wedding ring.)
Then, there's the psychotic ex-boyfriend. He can't stand that he never got to first base with the now newlywed and resorts to criminal behavior. One could say his actions symbolize the challenges the young couple faces, but, based on director Burt Topper's other work, I doubt the thought ever entered his mind.
The bride is played by Anita Sands who photographs beautifully. Her career, though, was short-lived as she retired from acting at the age of 23 and later became an astrologer to Hollywood stars.
The film is a curiosity for those interested in looking into Hollywood's handling of teen marriage in the 1950s and fans of the work of American International Pictures - the studio that built a mini-empire by focusing on films for young people.
The producers also take no sides, or seemingly have an issue, with a 24 year old man marrying a 17 year old girl.
Instead, they take the controversial topic and turn it into a pulpy melodrama aimed at the teenage drive-in theatre audience of the times.
Some of the film's elements border on the surreal. Take the beatnik coffee shop that doubles as a flamenco lounge. Or one of the establishment's customers who tunes out the live music, and the world around him, by hearing music from his transistor radio through ear "buds." Or, how about the 17-year old constantly cuddling her stuffed toy dog to symbolize her youth. On her wedding night the camera tilts down from her kissing her husband to her hand dropping the pooch and lingers on her wedding ring.)
Then, there's the psychotic ex-boyfriend. He can't stand that he never got to first base with the now newlywed and resorts to criminal behavior. One could say his actions symbolize the challenges the young couple faces, but, based on director Burt Topper's other work, I doubt the thought ever entered his mind.
The bride is played by Anita Sands who photographs beautifully. Her career, though, was short-lived as she retired from acting at the age of 23 and later became an astrologer to Hollywood stars.
The film is a curiosity for those interested in looking into Hollywood's handling of teen marriage in the 1950s and fans of the work of American International Pictures - the studio that built a mini-empire by focusing on films for young people.
I don't know why, but for some reason "The Diary of a High School Bride" was a title that piqued my curiosity. Unfortunately, the film itself didn't live up to those expectations. I imagined there might be voice-overs of a young high school girl reading from her diary regarding her experiences, memories, feelings, challenges of being, or having been a high school bride. What we're given is something much more straightforward, complete with awkward performances, awkward direction, a weak script, and a story that doesn't really go anywhere and doesn't offer up many genuine insights regarding what it feels like to be a high school bride. Oh sure, there is some information and light shed on this topic, but not as much as it could have. The only interesting thing is the slight bit of suspense towards the very end, which I won't spoil for anyone still interested in checking this film out. Oh, and the painting on the wall referencing another film, "The Screaming Skull", that bit worked well, even if it was only a couple seconds.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn January 1960, this film was widely shown in drive-in theaters on a double bill with Ghost of Dragstrip Hollow (1959), also from Alta Vista Productions.
- BlooperSteve and Judy's route home from Las Vegas makes no sense. After they are stopped for speeding, they are shown taking the Balboa ferry--away from the peninsula--in Newport Beach, which is south of Los Angeles. Then they are shown on a freeway in downtown Los Angeles--note the iconic City Hall building in the background.
- ConnessioniReferences Baionette in canna (1958)
- Colonne sonoreDiary of a High School Bride
Performed and written by Tony Casanova
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Fern Dell, Griffith Park - 4730 Crystal Springs Drive, Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti(Judy and Steve go for a walk in a park with footbridges and a small waterfall)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 80.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 12min(72 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti