Sarah Walters, malata di cuore, è contentissima che il figlio Johnny, dopo anni di assenza, ritorni a casa. Per salvaguardare la salute della madre nessuno le rivelerà che Johnny è un serial... Leggi tuttoSarah Walters, malata di cuore, è contentissima che il figlio Johnny, dopo anni di assenza, ritorni a casa. Per salvaguardare la salute della madre nessuno le rivelerà che Johnny è un serial killer.Sarah Walters, malata di cuore, è contentissima che il figlio Johnny, dopo anni di assenza, ritorni a casa. Per salvaguardare la salute della madre nessuno le rivelerà che Johnny è un serial killer.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Reverend Johnson
- (partecipazione non confermata)
- Miss Brighton
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Mrs. Dunwiddy
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Tom Hibbs
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Rose Cobb
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Detective
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Hazel Cobb
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Man with Dog
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Doctor
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Mr. Dunwiddy
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
It's a remake of Hitchcock's SHADOW OF A DOUBT, and on its own terms, it's okay, another Universal movie about the darkness that lies at the heart of sunny 1950s America. Of course, because it's a remake of what happens to be my favorite Hitchcock movie, it seems weak in comparison. Still, for an ordinary programmer, it's all right. With Jocelyn Brando and Ann Doran.
Charles Drake plays a man on the run from the law...though exactly what he's done isn't clear until later in the film. He arrives in his old hometown after being gone six years. He says it's to see family and perhaps settle down there, but it's really a ruse...he's there to hide from the law.
At first, the family is thrilled he is home. However, his widowed sister-in-law goes from adoring him and welcoming his return to actually confronting him when she thinks he might be a murderer...which is amazingly dumb. From this point to the ending, it all goes VERY quickly and is really disappointing.
The bottom line is that this remake is inferior in every way and I can't think of a good reason to watch it. Stick with the original...unless you want to compare them and see why the Hitchcock version is simply better.
Johnny inadvertently gets his sister-in-law Helen, Coleen Miller,to check out a newspaper that he ripped an article out of at the local public library and she sees in that newspaper that there's a killer on the loose and his latest victim was a woman from New Orleans who he murdered named Janice Dawson.
Sweet and kind Johnny gave Helen a ring with the initials J.D on it that he couldn't convincingly explain to her how those initials got there; a ring he won gambling Johnny told her. Later the policeman who came from out of state to arrest Johnny Mike Randall, Rod Taylor, calls Helen and tells her the good news that the killer who they were looking for who the police thought was Johnny was killed in a shoot out in New York City. This came across as pure gobbeldygook since how did the police know, just by him being dead, that he was the killer of the women that Johnny was suspected of killing. That still didn't explain Johnny's creepy and unnerving actions with Helen, who he tried to kill twice by having her fall down a stairway that he "fixed" and then later tried to kill her by putting a bottle of sleeping pills in her milk. I thought for a moment that Randall just wanted Helen as well as Johnny to know that he wasn't a suspect so that he would have his guard down and make it easier for the police to arrest him later.
Another thing that struck me was Johnny's mental state. Why would he throw suspicion on himself by tearing out the article about the killings since his name wasn't mentioned at all in the story? By him acting so guilty Johnny only made Helen suspect that he was the killer especially with the clue that he gave her. The ring with the initials G.D those of the killers victim in the article?
Charles Drake played a psycho killer to the hilt and almost as well as Anthony Perkins played Norman Bates in the movie "Psycho" two years later. The movie makers of "Step down to Terror" didn't seem to know how to end the picture with it having something like three different endings.
Ending #!. Johnny meekly giving himself up to the police. Ending #2. Johnny Cracking Randell's skull as he was about to arrest him. And Ending #3. Johnny driving away from the police and having his seven year-old nephew Doug,Ricky Kelman, come out of nowhere with his bike in front of Johnny's car and Johnny getting killed trying to avoid him with Helen in the car as a hostage surviving the crash.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizA remake of 1943's Shadow of a Doubt, directed by Alfred Hitchcock.
- BlooperThe character name "Johnny Walters" is wrongly listed in the end credits as "Johnny Williams."
- Citazioni
Johnny Walters: Hey, where's my favorite sister-in-law? Helen! Helen!
Helen Walters: Oh, Johnny!
[they embrace]
Helen Walters: Oh, it's so good to see you.
Johnny Walters: Well, you look more beautiful than ever. Maybe I should have come home sooner.
- ConnessioniRemake of L'ombra del dubbio (1943)
I più visti
- How long is Step Down to Terror?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- The Silent Stranger
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 16 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1