Questo documentario esamina l'autenticità della documentazione fotografica delle missioni Apollo della NASA.Questo documentario esamina l'autenticità della documentazione fotografica delle missioni Apollo della NASA.Questo documentario esamina l'autenticità della documentazione fotografica delle missioni Apollo della NASA.
Recensioni in evidenza
It makes very interesting questions about the moon landing, ones that go further than "no stars in the sky" or "visible cables". I have yet to find feasible counter arguments to the claims made here, but at a first look it's arguments are very, very compelling.
I read some info about the moon landings being faked and some info on them being real. I never really researched this subject much. I shared the thoughts of the whole world that the moon landings did happen but as fter seeing this I cannot go back. It's like swallowing the red pill and going down the rabbit hole never to return again. It completely changed my outlook on this subject.
A complete masterpiece inputting all information available into a well narrated documentary.
A complete masterpiece inputting all information available into a well narrated documentary.
After having seen a few videos about the "moon conspiracy" and their dumb arguments about UFOs and other nonsense, I certainly didn't want to waste time and money on yet another "documentary" on this old subject.
So I waited until it was publicly available for free and I started to watch it due to some friends insisting so much.
And boy, it took me off guard: I could not stop and I had to watch all of it, until the end (and it's long!).
It's an extremely well done movie, where finally someone is able to present facts and competing theories with balance, and ending each chapter with a question instead of dumb proclaims.
I look forward to hearing the replies to those 42 questions, because I think that for a few of them it will be very, very hard.
So I waited until it was publicly available for free and I started to watch it due to some friends insisting so much.
And boy, it took me off guard: I could not stop and I had to watch all of it, until the end (and it's long!).
It's an extremely well done movie, where finally someone is able to present facts and competing theories with balance, and ending each chapter with a question instead of dumb proclaims.
I look forward to hearing the replies to those 42 questions, because I think that for a few of them it will be very, very hard.
10pjust-1
This documentary is so good, that it should be the one, all other documentaries are measured by. It looks objectively on the moonlanding and the years leading up to the moonlanding and answers the questions, that both the believers and the deniers ask and has expert photographers look at the photos from the landing.
After watching this documentary, there can only be one side left in the agelong debate: "Did the Americans land on the moon in 1969".
You be the judge after watching.
After watching this documentary, there can only be one side left in the agelong debate: "Did the Americans land on the moon in 1969".
You be the judge after watching.
10R_Hak
I never had thought I would be on the "side" or "conspiracy theorists", considering my biomedical background, yet here I am, writing a very positive review on this documentary.
I now realise that the general public believes what they believe only because they never heard a differing argument, which would point out the inconsistency of the official narrative.
This is a long documentary, but NEVER boring, at least for those who want unapologetic truth.
The doc. Starts with an historical perspective, which is fairly important, then presents some pro moon-landing arguments, and then starts to dismantle them one by one. It also tries to clean the debate table of the bad arguments or better to call them false (flag! :) ) arguments, which I guess are also pushed forward by gov puppets in order to discredit the differing pov.
Anyhow, the most interesting part for me was the photographic evidence. I was in disbelief. The shadow thing, in itself, would have been enough for any sane and rational person to doubt and totally reject the official narrative.
You should watch this!
I now realise that the general public believes what they believe only because they never heard a differing argument, which would point out the inconsistency of the official narrative.
This is a long documentary, but NEVER boring, at least for those who want unapologetic truth.
The doc. Starts with an historical perspective, which is fairly important, then presents some pro moon-landing arguments, and then starts to dismantle them one by one. It also tries to clean the debate table of the bad arguments or better to call them false (flag! :) ) arguments, which I guess are also pushed forward by gov puppets in order to discredit the differing pov.
Anyhow, the most interesting part for me was the photographic evidence. I was in disbelief. The shadow thing, in itself, would have been enough for any sane and rational person to doubt and totally reject the official narrative.
You should watch this!
Lo sapevi?
- Citazioni
Peter Lindbergh: These pictures are fake. I would say I'm 100% sure.
- ConnessioniFeatures Viaggio nella luna (1902)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is American Moon?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione3 ore 34 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was American Moon (2017) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi