Una riunone di famiglia prende una piega bizzarra quando Ned Fleming si rende conto che il boyfriend miliardario di sua figlia intende chiederle di sposarlo.Una riunone di famiglia prende una piega bizzarra quando Ned Fleming si rende conto che il boyfriend miliardario di sua figlia intende chiederle di sposarlo.Una riunone di famiglia prende una piega bizzarra quando Ned Fleming si rende conto che il boyfriend miliardario di sua figlia intende chiederle di sposarlo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Cedric The Entertainer
- Lou Dunne
- (as Cedric the Entertainer)
Recensioni in evidenza
Despite what other people wrote I thought it was fun and hilarious.
My daughter talked me into watching it...I was not disappointed 🙂
I still mourn for the time I spent watching this thing it can't be classified as a movie it would be an insult to cinema I strongly advise you to not watch it. If only there was a tool to erase my m memory so I could wipe this movie completely from my mind it is ground zero it's terrible it's a waste of time.
There is a weird guy who is ultra rich and loves a girl and to marry her he needs her father's consent and for this reason invites her family to his castle like luxury House where he also works with his employees and this guy can't speak without f word. Everyone puts up with him just because his richness cover his unacceptable weird psychopath behaviors.
There is a weird guy who is ultra rich and loves a girl and to marry her he needs her father's consent and for this reason invites her family to his castle like luxury House where he also works with his employees and this guy can't speak without f word. Everyone puts up with him just because his richness cover his unacceptable weird psychopath behaviors.
Thank god I have dry humour as I found this movie so funny. How people can say it's not funny I will never know. If you're reading this and have NOT yet seen the movie, go ahead and which it as it's bloody funny.
"Why Him" is a movie with jokes that actually got me to laugh.
I like the concept of a programmer/hermit (Laird) getting with a smart girl from Stanford (Stephanie) and making a first impression to her parents, which is an absolute failure.
There's a fair bit of sex scenes and profanity (Laird's swearing, especially when unintended, is entertaining) so don't watch this with your children. While a comedy, not a comedy for the whole family.
However, I don't really like any other aspects. The plot is sloppy and repetitive, and the whole film centers around 1 day or so. Camerawork could have been better executed.
Sending my love to Gustav (especially the actor).
I like the concept of a programmer/hermit (Laird) getting with a smart girl from Stanford (Stephanie) and making a first impression to her parents, which is an absolute failure.
There's a fair bit of sex scenes and profanity (Laird's swearing, especially when unintended, is entertaining) so don't watch this with your children. While a comedy, not a comedy for the whole family.
However, I don't really like any other aspects. The plot is sloppy and repetitive, and the whole film centers around 1 day or so. Camerawork could have been better executed.
Sending my love to Gustav (especially the actor).
Why him? I tell you why, because I can't think of any other actor who can transform this this cinematic excrement into a gourmet dish. There is a matteroffactness in his character that lives somewhere between Rupert Pumpkin and Howard Hughes, the thing is that the life James Franco gives to his character is absolutely real. The film could have turned into a horror thriller, because Franco forces you, in the most entertaining way, to feel slightly off-balance. That alone keeps you glued to it in spite of the moronic lack of ideas. Bryan Cranston, of course, is sheer perfection. Reacting hilariously to the absurdity with infinite generosity - A trait of great actors - I wish them a Billy Wilder next time or a Preston Sturges or...you know. Fearless originals just like Franco and Cranston.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to Megan Mullally, the cast was given free access to improvise as much as they wanted to and eventually 240 hours of film was shot on camera, which had to be trimmed to 90 minutes for the final film.
- BlooperWhen Gustav introduces intern Randy to the family, he says he graduated "summa cum laude" from MIT. MIT does not give class rankings or Latin honors to its students.
- Citazioni
Laird Mayhew: I don't know how to talk to the guy. It's like we speak two different languages or something.
Gustav: You do.
Laird Mayhew: Yeah.
Gustav: He speaks English, and you speak English with resounding amounts of "fuck."
- Curiosità sui creditiThere is a scene with Gustav after the first credits.
- Colonne sonoreDown On the Corner
Written by John Fogerty (as John Cameron Fogerty)
Performed by Creedence Clearwater Revival
Courtesy of Concord Music Group, Inc.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Why Him??Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- ¿Por qué él?
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Grand Rapids, Michigan, Stati Uniti(external locations)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 38.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 60.323.786 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 11.002.986 USD
- 25 dic 2016
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 118.102.725 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 51min(111 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti