VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,3/10
1876
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Quando una pandemia globale costringe un'attrice televisiva a fuggire nella sua città natale, un intruso del suo passato si rivela pericoloso quanto il virus invasore.Quando una pandemia globale costringe un'attrice televisiva a fuggire nella sua città natale, un intruso del suo passato si rivela pericoloso quanto il virus invasore.Quando una pandemia globale costringe un'attrice televisiva a fuggire nella sua città natale, un intruso del suo passato si rivela pericoloso quanto il virus invasore.
Andrew Marksman
- Dead Man in Car
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Martin Mica
- Handsome Man
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jack Schuler
- Soldier
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
I was surprised to see this movie's low rating. I expected this movie to be rubbish honestly, and if you're expecting an action disaster movie you won't get it here. It is simply set up and realistic in my opinion. It has some flaws but I found it believable and refreshing. The main character had more depth than I expected given the set up of a pretty actress. Not a ground breaking story, but cinematography was beautiful. Well done cast and crew. You deserve better than 4 stars.
You must have at least one likable character going from scene to scene doing reasonably intelligent things
as previous reviewers have said - its not sci fi
I wasted almost an hour hoping it would improve but it didn't
I hope the film makers can learn that the audience needs to follow a character that behaves in a manner that we can support.
To say there are gaps in the plot is an understatement.
as previous reviewers have said - its not sci fi
I wasted almost an hour hoping it would improve but it didn't
I hope the film makers can learn that the audience needs to follow a character that behaves in a manner that we can support.
To say there are gaps in the plot is an understatement.
What are these people thinking? Anyone who rated this movie 1/10 has never seen a REALLY TERRIBLE movie AND anyone who rated this movie 10/10 has never seen a REALLY GREAT movie. This movie was a typical low budget movie (simple plot, simple characters, predictable in every aspect). At 1 1/2 hours long it was OK. It's all in the expectations. Don't expect much and you won't be disappointed.
That I have to fast-forward through. This happens very rarely and I watch lots of films. During the quarantine, I've watched like 20 films and I just want to say I'm sorry since I just couldn't force myself to sit through this one.
It is in fact - boring and unengaging. After literally nothing interesting (besides setting up the premise) happened in the first 40 minutes I was just forced to fast forward through this one and believe me, I've seen a lot of slow films that work. Scenes are there for a reason, these have to establish something, characters, their relations, build up the atmosphere, you should avoid filler scenes in a film.
I don't want to go hard on the creators, but did no one really took a look at this film and say - this just can't work, it's too slow and we clearly have not enough material for a full feature?
The main lead is likable (although distractingly beautiful in a classic sense of the word), her character has an arc, the message in there, literally burning the bridges and killing the past, evolving.
Why not give the script some time and thought? Fill it with something interesting?
It is in fact - boring and unengaging. After literally nothing interesting (besides setting up the premise) happened in the first 40 minutes I was just forced to fast forward through this one and believe me, I've seen a lot of slow films that work. Scenes are there for a reason, these have to establish something, characters, their relations, build up the atmosphere, you should avoid filler scenes in a film.
I don't want to go hard on the creators, but did no one really took a look at this film and say - this just can't work, it's too slow and we clearly have not enough material for a full feature?
The main lead is likable (although distractingly beautiful in a classic sense of the word), her character has an arc, the message in there, literally burning the bridges and killing the past, evolving.
Why not give the script some time and thought? Fill it with something interesting?
I was in the mood for a trashy post-apocalyptic story. Came across this, saw the low ratings and thought here is my guy. What I got instead was a tight and interesting character drama. Pleasantly surprising. It has many faults, sure. Directing and cinematography is good, acting ok, but the editor should maybe find another career. But again, watch it with an open mind and you won't be sorry. Quite enjoyable.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizTutte le opzioni contengono spoiler
- BlooperKelly is beside the pickup truck when Ava's father approaches, then one sees little of him for an extended time during which Ava disarms and kills two members of the household, then escapes and is shot at by a third member. Kelly then appears in the house but it's unclear where he was all that time.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Before the Fire?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti