Neru
- 2023
- 2 घं 30 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
7.5/10
9.2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
सारा, एक अंधी मूर्तिकार, आघात सहने के बाद न्याय चाहती है. वह समाधान खोजने के लिए कानूनी व्यवस्था और अपने स्वयं के लचीलेपन के साथ संघर्ष करती है.सारा, एक अंधी मूर्तिकार, आघात सहने के बाद न्याय चाहती है. वह समाधान खोजने के लिए कानूनी व्यवस्था और अपने स्वयं के लचीलेपन के साथ संघर्ष करती है.सारा, एक अंधी मूर्तिकार, आघात सहने के बाद न्याय चाहती है. वह समाधान खोजने के लिए कानूनी व्यवस्था और अपने स्वयं के लचीलेपन के साथ संघर्ष करती है.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 7 नामांकन
Santhi Mayadevi
- Ahaana
- (as Shanthi Mayadevi)
Prashant Nair
- New CI
- (as Dr. Prashant Nair)
Resmi Anil
- Seema
- (as Reshmi Anil)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This is a decent attempt from Jeethu Joseph. Nothing like Drishyam or even Kooman, but engaging and watchable. The thread is good, but the climax was predictable and also very melodramatic. Also, the casting in the movie was off in multiple places. The primary example is Shanti Mayadevi. She simply cannot act and is awkward in a majority of the scenes. I totally understand, that's not her forte, but why give her such a meaty role? The victims mother also couldn't handle the emotional scenes. Also, Jeethu succumbs to the usual tropes of overdoing some scenes - like the incompetence of the first lawyer. The movie is also unnecessarily long and spends insane amounts of time on a CCTV visual. I'm summary, it's a good attempt and an engaging court drama, but not as stellar as it's touted to be.
Even with a predictable storyline Jeethu Joseph's mastery of scriptwriting with Shanthi Mayadevi's knowledge as an advocate makes this engaging and effective. Jeethu Joseph has always been a better writer than a director and there are a lot of instances in the movie that clearly shows that aspect. Some of the smaller characters' acting was not very good, the music was overused a lot and there were a few things that could've been trimmed out. But when it works, the film works great. Even though, it's not something very novel, Mohanlal saying some dialogues did make me clap hard, knowing that I'm sitting in a packed theatre with a lot of families. Anaswara and Siddique were brilliant in their roles and Mohanlal has done a role that is subtle, vulnerable and serious in a very effective way after a long time. Despite the film using easy ways to tell a lot of things, despite the plot being nothing new, it being not new makes more of a case of how it is still so important in every aspect, due to which I was very satisfied by the end of the movie.
No story, no suspense, just plain.
Expected a stronger and more engaging plot from Jeetu Joseph. Disappointed.
The crime was done and culprit was found in the first ten minutes. Then the seen too many times case where the hero first does not show interest and everyone else requests him to take the case. Hero accepts and then a very ordinary court proceedings follow. No real challenges faced by the hero. Overhyped obstacles. Villain is rich and has employed a Supreme Court advocate. No display of high intelligence from hero. No mass dialogues nor anything engaging.
A mediocre movie made on an interesting topic!
Expected a stronger and more engaging plot from Jeetu Joseph. Disappointed.
The crime was done and culprit was found in the first ten minutes. Then the seen too many times case where the hero first does not show interest and everyone else requests him to take the case. Hero accepts and then a very ordinary court proceedings follow. No real challenges faced by the hero. Overhyped obstacles. Villain is rich and has employed a Supreme Court advocate. No display of high intelligence from hero. No mass dialogues nor anything engaging.
A mediocre movie made on an interesting topic!
If it were 20 years ago I would have been overly impressed like the rest of the audiences. But now you could see a mile ahead how the plot is deliberately being sabotaged to create thrilling moments. This is evident when the blind victim is asked to prove her ability to sculpt a bust through her sense of touch. Even if this is true, the subject cannot be permitted to be someone who is directly involved in the case like the lawyer as he can purposely influence the outcome to discredit the victim. This was an manufactured scene to prove it to be a David and Goliath case. There are many such instances throughout the movie. But besides this obvious tweaking of the plot the movie is definitely watchable as somewhere in this movie there is a sad commentory on the Indian judicial system where victims of such heinous crime do not get justice, just the shame. So this movies can be added to the likes of the movie "Pink" which deals in the same subject.
At the interval stage now. .. (updated !)
The movie started reasonable, but soon it was evident that this was not going to be anything of the class the director delivered in Drishyam.
Then the trial started and the "classic masala" started pouring thru. With the defense lawyer doing a character assassination in court, something that has been disallowed for a long time now. Only to allow Mohanlal to deliver a punch dialogue shortly after.
Then the accused makes an another attempt at the victim, with goondas and all. Saw this is a masala movie, from the 90s??
Oh boy I am now trembling at what could exist going forward.
So far the homework by director and acting by "actors" are below par.
Post interval things, picked up a bit. From court room drama, it moves to crime investigation.
But there are bits of court room, so unlike what you see in Nna thaan case kodu or even Naradan.
The climax and situation leading to it was so predictable. I was wondering why this wasnt done even before, because it was a crucial question raised early on.
I changed my rating from 4/10 to 5, thanks to a few scenes in the 2nd half.
The movie started reasonable, but soon it was evident that this was not going to be anything of the class the director delivered in Drishyam.
Then the trial started and the "classic masala" started pouring thru. With the defense lawyer doing a character assassination in court, something that has been disallowed for a long time now. Only to allow Mohanlal to deliver a punch dialogue shortly after.
Then the accused makes an another attempt at the victim, with goondas and all. Saw this is a masala movie, from the 90s??
Oh boy I am now trembling at what could exist going forward.
So far the homework by director and acting by "actors" are below par.
Post interval things, picked up a bit. From court room drama, it moves to crime investigation.
But there are bits of court room, so unlike what you see in Nna thaan case kodu or even Naradan.
The climax and situation leading to it was so predictable. I was wondering why this wasnt done even before, because it was a crucial question raised early on.
I changed my rating from 4/10 to 5, thanks to a few scenes in the 2nd half.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाMohanlal's first theatrical successful film post pandemic.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $20,93,761
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 30 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें