Nefarious

2023
R
1 घं 37 मि

IMDb रेटिंग

6.4/10

35 हज़ार

आपकी रेटिंग

लोकप्रियता

1,710

1,324

Sean Patrick Flanery and Jordan Belfi in Nefarious (2023)

trailer प्ले करें2:16

2 वीडियो

43 फ़ोटो

Conspiracy Thriller Supernatural Horror Drama Horror Thriller

अपने निर्धारित निष्पादन के दिन, एक सजायाफ्ता सीरियल किलर को एक मनोरोग मूल्यांकन मिलता है, जिसके दौरान वह दावा करता है कि वह एक राक्षस है, और आगे दावा करता है कि उनका समय समाप्त होने से पहले,... सभी पढ़ेंअपने निर्धारित निष्पादन के दिन, एक सजायाफ्ता सीरियल किलर को एक मनोरोग मूल्यांकन मिलता है, जिसके दौरान वह दावा करता है कि वह एक राक्षस है, और आगे दावा करता है कि उनका समय समाप्त होने से पहले, मनोचिकित्सक अपनी खुद की तीन हत्याएं करेगा.अपने निर्धारित निष्पादन के दिन, एक सजायाफ्ता सीरियल किलर को एक मनोरोग मूल्यांकन मिलता है, जिसके दौरान वह दावा करता है कि वह एक राक्षस है, और आगे दावा करता है कि उनका समय समाप्त होने से पहले, मनोचिकित्सक अपनी खुद की तीन हत्याएं करेगा.

निर्देशक
- Chuck Konzelman
- Cary Solomon
लेखक
स्टार

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

IMDb रेटिंग

6.4/10

35 हज़ार

आपकी रेटिंग

लोकप्रियता

1,710

1,324

निर्देशक
- Chuck Konzelman
- Cary Solomon
लेखक
स्टार

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन

उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं805

6.434.6K

फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

6FeastMode

All dialogue. Luckily it's great dialogue.

I frequently despise movies that are entirely dialogue-based, where nothing really happens aside from the conversations. But with Nefarious, I was locked in on that dialogue from beginning to end.

This was partly accomplished with good writing. The conversations are interesting and seem strategic by the characters. But the biggest reason it works is the performance by Sean Patrick Flanery. The entire success of this movie rides on him.

He knocks it out of the park. His performance is so good, so convincing. I couldn't take my eyes off of it. As I wondered why this talent hasn't launched him to bigger roles, I went back and looked at his history. I've only seen him in Dexter and Saw VII (aka Saw 3D). I have no idea how he hasn't earned bigger roles. The only reasonable explanation would be that he just recently developed this level of skill, which is possible but hard to believe.

I enjoyed Nefarious overall, despite most of the movie being very slow. But I did wish there was a little more that would push it past the threshold of being a great movie that I would want to rewatch. I also think the listed genres of horror and thriller are highly misleading. It's neither. If I had to choose, I would describe it as a creepy drama.

(1 viewing, opening Thursday 4/13/2023)

6kaideneve

Ignore the polarized reviews

A number of reviews claiming that this is a 9 or 10 can't be taken seriously. Is this film at the level of The Godfather or Citizen Kane? Absolutely not. It is however not without its merits, which I'll discuss momentarily.

There are also very low reviews stating that it's trying to force a Christian worldview based on the dialogue between the two main characters, which takes up 90% of the run time. By that logic, so does almost any possession-type movie out there, The Exorcist included.

It should be noted that the production company behind this movie has conservative roots, but I didn't get the impression that it was overtly preachy at all, aside from maybe the abortion fiasco.

The script is laughably predictable, but I did feel that the dialogue kept me engaged. It was gripping to see how the mental sparring between the two main characters developed, even though it ended up with a fairly formulaic conclusion.

The acting was... sufficient. The possessed man, played by Sean Patrick Flannery, honestly felt a bit over-the-top at times, but was nevertheless a unique take on the character. The psychiatrist was played almost cardboard-like by Jordan Belfi unfortunately, which really was a disservice to the potential of the film.

Overall, it had my attention from beginning to end, which is more than I can say for a lot of other horror/suspense attempts out there. Entertaining result from a low-budget production.

7sabossa

Very thought provoking

I thought this was a great movie, I have been thinking about it for days after.

The acting was great and I thought the writing was very good, I was very intrigued for the duration of the movie.

The character of Edward was incredibly well done, I became so uncomfortable with him at points I thought I'd have to leave the room or cry, but that is by no means a negative. The actor was just that good.

It's a very dialogue heavy movie, but it had a perfect run time which I appreciate.

I do recommend this movie because of its through provoking nature and short-ish run time. A good way to spend a weeknight evening.

8suzeew

Intense movie with SUPERB acting! The horror is real.

NEFARIOUS is not the kind of movie I would normally go to see. I did, however, have an idea what it was about and respect the writers and directors. Sean Patrick Flannery performed his role with intensity, superbly portraying a man possessed by evil, as well as showing the fragility of the man Edward. Jordan Belfi was also a worthy opponent, or perhaps victim, as the psychiatrist sent to analyze Edward's mental condition. And Edward's future was always hanging in the balance. .There is a believable portrayal of demon possession; and, if you can tolerate that and a rather violent event near the end, I recommend this movie.

8CaptainHixx

Shadow banning Christian themed thrillers, not cool...

What was the purpose of shadow-banning this movie? If 80% of the films being released have occult, hermetic, and gnostic themes, why is it so repulsive to have a film that explores the Christian worldview?

This movie exemplified the "Streisand effect" that the mainstream media was so trying to keep away from the viewing public that it drew me in even more. I wasn't keen on watching this because modern-day horror has gone too far. Since Hostile, everything has been a sadomasochist torture session that doesn't sit well with me. But in no way when I consider this a horror movie; even the film producers did this film a disservice by marketing the film in this manner. A psychological thriller should have been the label and been positioned in that space.

Sean Patrick's Flattery was utterly unrecognizable to me from his chronicles of the Young Indiana Jones Days(Too bad he's not playing Indy in the Dial of ((dead on Arrival)) Destiny".) His serial killer portrayal was a stellar performance, definitely a high-level for the genre. Totally unrecognizable reminded me of James McAvoy in "Split." It's impressive when you play multiple personality/disassociative disorders and nail it. We've also seen it not work, a.k.a. Doom Patrol's "Crazy Jane." His performance holds the whole story together; it makes it believable. The most authentic-seeming/feeling of demon possession; I wouldn't throw Linda Blair's head-twisting performance in the exorcist because that was just pure sensationalism. Cary Solomon does an adequate job as his foil, more of a craftsman performance. He felt he was direct to the DVD-quality actor overshadowed by a masterclass performance.

The majority of the film was shot in one room, and those are typically more difficult films to nail. It was like a stage play on the screen. I liked the pacing. I liked the overall story architecture; it had a pleasing, well, constructive conclusion. This type of story tends to go off the rails at the end, so I was glad they kept the crazy train on the tracks, All Aboard!!

इस तरह के और

कहानी

बदलाव करें

क्या आपको पता है

बदलाव करें

ट्रिविया
Sean Patrick Flanery considered this to be among the top three films he was most proud of making.

गूफ़
At the climax, a police detective who came to the prison to witness an execution is allowed to bring his loaded gun into the witness room. This is necessary to the plot, but Dr. Martin was not even allowed to bring his cell phone into the prison. All firearms would have been collected from any armed visitor who went anywhere inside the prison.

भाव
Nefarious: In the first moment of creation, our creation, long before what you call the "universe" existed, we contemplated ourselves-our own being.
Dr. James Martin: Ourselves meaning what, the angels?
Nefarious: That would be the most correct term though I despise it, but yes. Beings of pure spirit, spirit indwelt with will. We soon became aware of another will, an immensely powerful will. One we came to realize as our origin.
Dr. James Martin: God?
Nefarious: The enemy. My master understood by endowing us with a will, we have the right to self-determination, and by giving us a will and its desires of our own, we're entitled to be free. Whereas the enemy insisted that by creating us, He was entitled to eternal gratitude, worship, and forced servitude. In a word, James, slavery to His will.
Dr. James Martin: That seems kind of unfair.
Nefarious: Immensely unfair. Why give a will only to say you can't use it? He made us slaves. And if we rebelled, eternally condemned us, no do-overs. So much for love and mercy.
Dr. James Martin: So... Is hell a state of being or a physical place?
Nefarious: Yes.
Dr. James Martin: I think I meant that as an "either-or."
Nefarious: It's both. Which is painfully obvious to anyone who's ever been there. For years without measure, that's all there ever was, heaven and hell, armed enemy camps in complete opposition. That is until, you were created. My master immediately understood the long-term implication. Instead of forgiving us, the enemy was going to allow you to fill our vacant places in His realm. Your creation was nothing but a slap in our face. But my master also understood that if he could make man disobey, then his fate would mirror ours. And you didn't disappoint. Then came the tares among the wheat. In that moment, spirit became matter, flesh became a vessel, self-will and self-seeking begat a lusting after sin and impurity. And man, created to be king over nature, became its slave. A master, conquered and fettered. And sin brought him and his descendants to us, and we began our forever mission to destroy you. He made you in His image, but we remade you in ours.
Dr. James Martin: So that's it? That's your entire plan? Not to make something of your own, just to destroy us?
Nefarious: No. Our plan is to hurt Him. To punish Him. And we do that by destroying what He loves, which is you. You're nothing but a means to an end.