विश्वासघात के बाद और इटली में मरने के लिए छोड़ने के बाद, चार्ली क्रोकर और उनकी टीम ने अपने पूर्व सहयोगी के खिलाफ़ एक विस्तृत सोने की रॉबरी की योजना बनाईविश्वासघात के बाद और इटली में मरने के लिए छोड़ने के बाद, चार्ली क्रोकर और उनकी टीम ने अपने पूर्व सहयोगी के खिलाफ़ एक विस्तृत सोने की रॉबरी की योजना बनाईविश्वासघात के बाद और इटली में मरने के लिए छोड़ने के बाद, चार्ली क्रोकर और उनकी टीम ने अपने पूर्व सहयोगी के खिलाफ़ एक विस्तृत सोने की रॉबरी की योजना बनाई
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 7 जीत और कुल 9 नामांकन
Yasiin Bey
- Left Ear
- (as Mos Def)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
John Bridger's gang of thieves are double crossed and left for dead after a daring gold raid in Venice. The surviving members regroup and convene in L.A. to enact revenge and recapture their gold ... the job is on!
This could have been a complete disaster, I'm British and the wave of revulsion that boomed in my homeland upon hearing of this remake was explosive; "how dare they remake a British institution" was the cry. Things were not helped in the run up to the film's release by main star (and draw card) Edward Norton, proclaiming that the film was a contractual obligation and that fans of his work would be better advised to give The Italian Job a miss...
Had to be a stinker then surely? Actually no it isn't. Director F. Gary Gray hasn't remade the "Italian Job" of 1969, in fact he hasn't even re-imaged it, the minis are in there, the gold is in there, but all the stand out moments so beloved by many in the 69 film of the same name are not to be seen at all. So what we get is a very cool heist-come revenge movie, that's maybe a tad too glossy at times, but it has got a pretty sharp script, tight action sequences and a group of actors working very well as a team. Mark Wahlberg, Mos Def, Jason Statham, Seth Green and the delectably delicious Charlize Theron all come out smelling of roses, whilst Edward Norton really had no cause for concern because his portrayal as Steve is a smarmy delight.
I have jokingly titled this film "Ocean's 5", but that is in no way detrimental to "The Italian Job", it lacks the jazzy coolness of "Soderbergh's Ocean's 11", but it's a fun and enjoyable picture all in its own right, thus the rating of just under 7 IMDb is actually spot on. 7/10
This could have been a complete disaster, I'm British and the wave of revulsion that boomed in my homeland upon hearing of this remake was explosive; "how dare they remake a British institution" was the cry. Things were not helped in the run up to the film's release by main star (and draw card) Edward Norton, proclaiming that the film was a contractual obligation and that fans of his work would be better advised to give The Italian Job a miss...
Had to be a stinker then surely? Actually no it isn't. Director F. Gary Gray hasn't remade the "Italian Job" of 1969, in fact he hasn't even re-imaged it, the minis are in there, the gold is in there, but all the stand out moments so beloved by many in the 69 film of the same name are not to be seen at all. So what we get is a very cool heist-come revenge movie, that's maybe a tad too glossy at times, but it has got a pretty sharp script, tight action sequences and a group of actors working very well as a team. Mark Wahlberg, Mos Def, Jason Statham, Seth Green and the delectably delicious Charlize Theron all come out smelling of roses, whilst Edward Norton really had no cause for concern because his portrayal as Steve is a smarmy delight.
I have jokingly titled this film "Ocean's 5", but that is in no way detrimental to "The Italian Job", it lacks the jazzy coolness of "Soderbergh's Ocean's 11", but it's a fun and enjoyable picture all in its own right, thus the rating of just under 7 IMDb is actually spot on. 7/10
If you are looking for a film that is quick witted and won't bore you then this is the place. It is fast paced and funny with some decent acting comeing from the characters. It is always hard for me to see Mark Walhberg as anything except Marky Mark. That image is burned in my mind forever. As an actor though he is pretty good. This movie is a must see for action fans who like to see a few little twists and turns. I will have to pick this movie up one day and buy it.
The original 1969 film offered something different. Set mostly in Turin-Italy the film is about a group of clumsy English villains who set out to grab a stash of gold bullion during transit. They find themselves up against it with both the Mafia and the Italian authorities. Much of the film is very typically British from the cast and their accents to the Austin Mini cars (red, white and blue with GB stickers on the back!).
This is one of the few films I can think of that doesn't have a happy ending but it does have the feel good factor and an excellent cliff hanger to boot. When viewed today it obviously lacks some of the refinements we have come to expect from the typical Hollywood blockbuster, some of the acting and camera shots are laughable. However 35 years on it still hold it's own and has many merits including...
Good music Lovely cars 60's Fashion Stunning backdrops Good stunts Original and plausible plot Memorable cliff hanger
A very British film with plenty of character 8/10
The new film is very different to the original movie. In fact most of the good features that the original had going for it were lost. In it's place is a blatant marketing exercise for the new BMW mini mixed in with some good but uninspiring action sequences. The new film starts in Italy but then moves to the U.S. which for me misses the point slightly. I found that the plot involving the traffic light control method used in the new film to be rather geeky and unbelievable at best (another feature that worked better in the old film).
Despite it's faults the film contains some nice action sequences and is watchable (although one viewing is more than enough).
If I hadn't already seen it all before, by itself this might be a great film. However I have and this isn't. 5/10
This is one of the few films I can think of that doesn't have a happy ending but it does have the feel good factor and an excellent cliff hanger to boot. When viewed today it obviously lacks some of the refinements we have come to expect from the typical Hollywood blockbuster, some of the acting and camera shots are laughable. However 35 years on it still hold it's own and has many merits including...
Good music Lovely cars 60's Fashion Stunning backdrops Good stunts Original and plausible plot Memorable cliff hanger
A very British film with plenty of character 8/10
The new film is very different to the original movie. In fact most of the good features that the original had going for it were lost. In it's place is a blatant marketing exercise for the new BMW mini mixed in with some good but uninspiring action sequences. The new film starts in Italy but then moves to the U.S. which for me misses the point slightly. I found that the plot involving the traffic light control method used in the new film to be rather geeky and unbelievable at best (another feature that worked better in the old film).
Despite it's faults the film contains some nice action sequences and is watchable (although one viewing is more than enough).
If I hadn't already seen it all before, by itself this might be a great film. However I have and this isn't. 5/10
I'm not an authority when it comes to the Michael Caine movie this was based BUT I will say that I enjoyed this movie. It was great seeing Edward Norton as a bad guy. Seth Green was funny and Mark Wahlberg was on point as usual.
This movie is nothing ground breaking as far as dramatic performances go, but it does follow in the tradition of fun caper movies like Soderbergh's remake of Ocean's Eleven.
In a nutshell, it's just an easy to follow, fun action movie. Lighten up and give it a chance.
This movie is nothing ground breaking as far as dramatic performances go, but it does follow in the tradition of fun caper movies like Soderbergh's remake of Ocean's Eleven.
In a nutshell, it's just an easy to follow, fun action movie. Lighten up and give it a chance.
I went to see THE ITALIAN JOB with mixed reviews in my head. I was pleasantly surprised with an entertaining close to 2 hours. I thought the cast was just great and so were the special effects, with the safe and truck just dropping out of sight. If you like fast paced action movies, this is the one to see.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe actors did most of their stunts, even driving down the stairs in the LA Metro.
- गूफ़Bullets do not travel at full speed through water. In reality, all bullets slow rapidly as soon as they hit the water, contrary to what is seen when Steve shoots into the lake. Not only do bullets slow down quickly when fired into water, high powered bullets from weapons like the assault rife Steve is using actually shred within inches of the surface of the water and then simply settle to the bottom of (in this case) the lake. Oddly enough, high-powered bullets have less penetration through water than lower-powered ones (a bullet's power is determined by the cartridge charge).
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAt the very end of the credits, the sound of coins falling and tinkling can be heard.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनFor the US television version, Steve's line "What the fuck happened to my truck?" has been replaced with alternate footage of him saying "What happened to my truck?". It is not an overdub; it is a complete replacement.
- कनेक्शनEdited into Yoostar 2: In the Movies (2011)
- साउंडट्रैकThe Wreckoning
by Kellin Manning and Taryn Manning
Performed by Boomkat
Courtesy of DreamWorks Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- चोर पे चोर
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $6,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $10,61,28,601
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,94,57,944
- 1 जून 2003
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $17,60,70,171
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 51 मि(111 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें