अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA delusional cryptozoologist and a psychopathic television presenter lead an amateur expedition into wild forests in hopes of finding the legendary Thunderbird, which they believe is the anc... सभी पढ़ेंA delusional cryptozoologist and a psychopathic television presenter lead an amateur expedition into wild forests in hopes of finding the legendary Thunderbird, which they believe is the ancestor of a prehistoric Pteranodon.A delusional cryptozoologist and a psychopathic television presenter lead an amateur expedition into wild forests in hopes of finding the legendary Thunderbird, which they believe is the ancestor of a prehistoric Pteranodon.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 4 जीत
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This is the worst kind of lazy, cynical content pooping (using the word filmmaking is an insult to filmmakers) with the end result beings so poor technically, it's tiring to watch (the only reason I did was to write a review for YouTube).
Underexposed video capture (using the word cinematography is an insult to cinematographers) is compounded by randomly dropping filters onto the poopage resulting in over saturation and further darkening of the image. There's actually a scene in the content poop where the people pretending to be actors argue about poor lighting. I found this insulting as it shows the content poopers knew enough to include it as dialogue but didn't implement it themselves.
Sound is terrible, obviously recorded using the phone mic and the stereo field isn't balanced, the dialogue should have been recorded in mono, or mixed down to mono. Music is awful and used throughout destroying any molecule of tension remaining after the embarrassingly bad 'acting', complete lack of production design, props and costumes.
In an attempt to be positive there's a stripper playing a scientist who has a very nice face, unfortunately I'm not a fan of (obviously fake breasts), for anyone wondering, they are not revealed, guess the content poopers didn't have $50.
The worst thing though is the people connected to the content pooping who have written glowing reviews, what do you think that's going to achieve? It just further demonstrates your contempt for the audience and complete lack of integrity, although as you are clearly not filmmakers I don't suppose that matters to you.
Underexposed video capture (using the word cinematography is an insult to cinematographers) is compounded by randomly dropping filters onto the poopage resulting in over saturation and further darkening of the image. There's actually a scene in the content poop where the people pretending to be actors argue about poor lighting. I found this insulting as it shows the content poopers knew enough to include it as dialogue but didn't implement it themselves.
Sound is terrible, obviously recorded using the phone mic and the stereo field isn't balanced, the dialogue should have been recorded in mono, or mixed down to mono. Music is awful and used throughout destroying any molecule of tension remaining after the embarrassingly bad 'acting', complete lack of production design, props and costumes.
In an attempt to be positive there's a stripper playing a scientist who has a very nice face, unfortunately I'm not a fan of (obviously fake breasts), for anyone wondering, they are not revealed, guess the content poopers didn't have $50.
The worst thing though is the people connected to the content pooping who have written glowing reviews, what do you think that's going to achieve? It just further demonstrates your contempt for the audience and complete lack of integrity, although as you are clearly not filmmakers I don't suppose that matters to you.
A couple interested in cryptozoology and paranormal happenings are determined to record the first episode of their proposed investigation show. They assemble five others for a (dubious) crew and enter into the wilds of eastern Kentucky to find the mythological thunderbird, which they believe to be a Pteranodon.
"Beasts of the Field" (2019) is a micro-budget Indie that only cost $30,000. It was shot in mid-September, 2018, and the many rain sequences are the peripheral effects of Hurricane Florence that hit the Carolinas. Obviously, you can't expect much with such a non-budget but it's generally entertaining with several highlights, assuming you don't mind Indie productions with little resources and the corresponding limitations.
For one, it's genuinely amusing in the first half, before the situation turns grim. Secondly, the forest cinematography is colorful and well done, which will be appreciated by those who value movies with a deep-woods milieu. Also, Ashley Mary Nunes (Kyra) is stunning in the female department; and Savannah Schafer (Reid) is also notable. Lastly, there is a relevant moral to the story.
It's significantly superior to the comparable "Monsters in the Woods" (2012), which cost the same amount (not counting six years of inflation).
The flick runs 1 hour, 17 minutes, and was shot in eastern Kentucky.
GRADE: C+/B-
"Beasts of the Field" (2019) is a micro-budget Indie that only cost $30,000. It was shot in mid-September, 2018, and the many rain sequences are the peripheral effects of Hurricane Florence that hit the Carolinas. Obviously, you can't expect much with such a non-budget but it's generally entertaining with several highlights, assuming you don't mind Indie productions with little resources and the corresponding limitations.
For one, it's genuinely amusing in the first half, before the situation turns grim. Secondly, the forest cinematography is colorful and well done, which will be appreciated by those who value movies with a deep-woods milieu. Also, Ashley Mary Nunes (Kyra) is stunning in the female department; and Savannah Schafer (Reid) is also notable. Lastly, there is a relevant moral to the story.
It's significantly superior to the comparable "Monsters in the Woods" (2012), which cost the same amount (not counting six years of inflation).
The flick runs 1 hour, 17 minutes, and was shot in eastern Kentucky.
GRADE: C+/B-
Low budget films usually good. This movie had the worst acting ever. Waste of time. They need to go to an acting school. Could have been good, but no effort and no skills.
First let me say that this is not a great movie. It is extremely rough and fraught with laughable errors. The cast are on par with a group of friends with someone's video camera heading out to *make a movie*.
That being said, it also isn't a hateful movie. The general story line, although very unpolished, shows potential. The concept deals with who or what a monster really is. Even the title is a subtle jab at the cruel and selfish nature of man's heart. The story held my attention and although the acting and dialog was excruciatingly painful. I found myself tipping my hat to this brave crew of first timers who had the courage and trepidation to complete the madness that is film making. Everyone has to start somewhere. I hope thebl best of luck to those who take the opportunity to hone their craft and continue on.
That being said, it also isn't a hateful movie. The general story line, although very unpolished, shows potential. The concept deals with who or what a monster really is. Even the title is a subtle jab at the cruel and selfish nature of man's heart. The story held my attention and although the acting and dialog was excruciatingly painful. I found myself tipping my hat to this brave crew of first timers who had the courage and trepidation to complete the madness that is film making. Everyone has to start somewhere. I hope thebl best of luck to those who take the opportunity to hone their craft and continue on.
Chase Dudley's most recent release "Beasts of the Field" is a unique twist on the "Creature" type horror film, in that the true monster in question is not what the first act would lead you to believe. Lester (Gregory Blair). A wannabe monster expert and his girlfriend Clarissa (Amber Dawn Fox) who fancies herself a "Hostess with the Mostest" snare an unwitting band of other "Experts" to join them in a search for the mythical creature known as The Thunderbird; Kyra (Ashley Mary Nunes), a university student seeking an internship to finish her college degree, another couple, Horty (Tory L. Beckham) and Reid (Savannah Schafer), are TV ad producers roped into acting as a film crew, James (Patrick Alred), a down on his luck former U. S. Army medic who agrees to provide first aid in the field, and Bigby Keith Nicholson), a good ol' boy hired as the group's guide and security. Lester and Clarissa have promised them all payment and a chance at fame and fortune with little more than a dream to back it all up.
As the journey begins, we learn quickly how unfit most of the team is for such an excursion, and they become even less fit as they encounter inclement weather and unexpected, non-mythical wildlife. As the situation becomes more and more desperate, the true colors of each member of the team begin to reveal themselves.
The synopsis stops here, as any more would spoil the fun.
As you would expect from a low budget, independent feature, there are technical issues with lighting, sound, etc. That sometimes detract from the viewing experience and distract the audience, but solid acting, writing and directing makes up for these shortfalls. The horror elements are nicely balanced by some truly inspired comedic moments provided by the talented cast. Erik Kyr, who composed the music and appears early in the film as an unimpressed, hard-nosed bank loan officer, delivers a sometimes energetic, sometimes haunting score that complements cinematographer Eddie Brown Jr.'s. Capable and occasionally stunning visuals. The screenplay by Brentt Slabchuck and Gregory Blair is a well-crafted bit of writing with a combination of subtle wit and grotesque savagery that frames the entire project. Finally, this latest offering from Director Chase Dudley shows real growth in his talents, and I look forward to seeing what he comes up with next.
As the journey begins, we learn quickly how unfit most of the team is for such an excursion, and they become even less fit as they encounter inclement weather and unexpected, non-mythical wildlife. As the situation becomes more and more desperate, the true colors of each member of the team begin to reveal themselves.
The synopsis stops here, as any more would spoil the fun.
As you would expect from a low budget, independent feature, there are technical issues with lighting, sound, etc. That sometimes detract from the viewing experience and distract the audience, but solid acting, writing and directing makes up for these shortfalls. The horror elements are nicely balanced by some truly inspired comedic moments provided by the talented cast. Erik Kyr, who composed the music and appears early in the film as an unimpressed, hard-nosed bank loan officer, delivers a sometimes energetic, sometimes haunting score that complements cinematographer Eddie Brown Jr.'s. Capable and occasionally stunning visuals. The screenplay by Brentt Slabchuck and Gregory Blair is a well-crafted bit of writing with a combination of subtle wit and grotesque savagery that frames the entire project. Finally, this latest offering from Director Chase Dudley shows real growth in his talents, and I look forward to seeing what he comes up with next.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाBeasts of the field was shot in the middle of a tropical storm. In 2018 hurricane Florence swept threw the Carolina's and made its way through Kentucky.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $30,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 17 मि(77 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.00 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें