pieromonbo

Many actual movies seem to me too professional and impersonal with an evident will to have an effect on the spectator. I don't like to be told what I have to feel as I'm watching a movie. That's why I liked so much "Tu mérites un amour". The director is a young woman Hafsia Herzi and it seems to be her first feature film after a short. She is also the main performer and has a rich experience as an actress. So I guess she didn't learn the job with theory and technical lessons but on the sets. It may explain her freedom and her sensibility, the way her camera loves her characters is truly moving, finding every time the right distance. A beautiful montage allows her to express in a very precise way, what she wants to tell about her characters. The subject is very thin, a young woman doesn't succeed in renouncing to a man that doesn't deserve her and cheats on her, and she deserves a love that she doesn't succeed in finding. I won't tell the end that doesn't much matter any way. Dialogues are excellent and funny. No morality preach about racism or intolerance for homosexuality; in fact no preach at all, but great portrayal of characters who try to find their way to happiness and love. Simple and straightforward but with a very delicate play of feelings.

Interesting subject and very beautiful jewish religious songs, two interesting characters well interpreted by Alessandro Nivola and Rachel McAddams. But the main character interpreted by Rachel Weisz is truly disappointing and frustrating. I haven't read the book but the interpretation is so poor, artificial that the character is just boring or even irritating. The photography is very professional but impersonal and so a good subject, an interesting relation between Esti and her husband are spoiled by an unimaginative treatment and the bad interpretation of the main character by Rachel Weisz also very annoying in an other film that had also a good subject Agora, but was finally very unsatisfactory.