payasoingenioso
A rejoint le févr. 2018
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.
Badges2
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Évaluations626
Note de payasoingenioso
Avis228
Note de payasoingenioso
The stories would be better told one at a time.
It's episode 4, and I finally realize there are multiple con artists per episode, not one shared con artist per episode.
The stories are solid but confusingly intertwined.
It reminds me of 90 Day Fiance formatting. Doesn't work here. One story at a time is better.
My qualm is so many of these people are not smart.
By episode four, people are donating funds to the wind and expecting a return.
I would prefer people a little bit smarter. Some of these people deserve to get their money stolen, and I don't want to watch that. 😪
The true crime show with Charisma Carpenter is EVERYTHING. 🙌
It's episode 4, and I finally realize there are multiple con artists per episode, not one shared con artist per episode.
The stories are solid but confusingly intertwined.
It reminds me of 90 Day Fiance formatting. Doesn't work here. One story at a time is better.
My qualm is so many of these people are not smart.
By episode four, people are donating funds to the wind and expecting a return.
I would prefer people a little bit smarter. Some of these people deserve to get their money stolen, and I don't want to watch that. 😪
The true crime show with Charisma Carpenter is EVERYTHING. 🙌
The acting was nice. The cinematography was excellent. But the plot was incoherent.
No horror whatsoever. Unless you count witnessing her work.
The supernatural element was unnecessary.
And the plot should have a point.
*I am repeating this review to meet character requirements.
The acting was nice. The cinematography was excellent. But the plot was incoherent.
No horror whatsoever. Unless you count witnessing her work.
The supernatural element was unnecessary.
And the plot should have a point.
*And even after pasting the review, I still need to waste more characters in order to post.
No horror whatsoever. Unless you count witnessing her work.
The supernatural element was unnecessary.
And the plot should have a point.
*I am repeating this review to meet character requirements.
The acting was nice. The cinematography was excellent. But the plot was incoherent.
No horror whatsoever. Unless you count witnessing her work.
The supernatural element was unnecessary.
And the plot should have a point.
*And even after pasting the review, I still need to waste more characters in order to post.
I did not want to like this film.
I consistently thought each scene could have been better.
But it has a The Office feel about it by the time the movie ends. And I almost appreciate the film's quirkiness.
The satire is the most excellent. So excellent that it outshines the movie's subjective flaws.
Something as obvious as a comet heading towards the earth caused such unfortunately relatable consequences.
If you consider yourself cynical, this movie is probably for you.
I consistently thought each scene could have been better.
But it has a The Office feel about it by the time the movie ends. And I almost appreciate the film's quirkiness.
The satire is the most excellent. So excellent that it outshines the movie's subjective flaws.
Something as obvious as a comet heading towards the earth caused such unfortunately relatable consequences.
If you consider yourself cynical, this movie is probably for you.