crazymikejj

This movie was OK from an entertainment standpoint but breaking it down further reveals it to be nothing more than pure propaganda. The four individual stories just seemed out of touch of reality. Wars do suck and soldiers are injured and maimed for life. However, there are a great many of us (I am in the military) that do come back and lead extremely productive lives, just as we did before we left. Why this movie had to take all four experiences and make them negative is beyond me. There are so many cases of men and women coming back who are able to deal with what they experienced. This movie made it seem as if everyone coming back from war is either screwed up psychologically, becomes violent or a drunkard or has to deal with life missing a limb. Furthermore, why was 50 cent in this movie? The clown can't even speak English. He has absolutely no talent when it comes to acting, and when it comes to music for that matter. Jessica Biel was bland and her acting was simply unbelievable. The only bright spot was from Samuel L. Jackson.

I was never an Adam Sandler fan. I always thought of his movies as simple, childish humor (just my opinion) but after about 10 minutes of watching his performance in this movie, all of that went out the window. This movie is simply one of the most moving, emotionally overwhelming films I have ever seen. All of the performances were A+ but Cheadle and Sandler simply were brilliant. I cannot say enough how powerful this movie was and I can't believe I didn't see this in the theater. How this movie does not rate a 10 is beyond and even more, who in the world gave this less than an 8. I'm a 38 year old male in the military and I cried at least three times during this movie.

I cannot believe how bad this movie was. I mean, very rarely will I NOT finish a film but I lasted about 20 to 25 minutes with this one. The acting was bad, the story was terrible, the stunts and "action scenes" if you want to call them that were absolutely horrendous. I simply cannot think of one good comment and yet I have to have a minimum of 10 lines to post this. It was just absolutely awful. How did this movie ever get approved? I wonder if the people involved in this debacle feels guilty about wasting money that could have gone to something more productive.

Michael Rooker is better than this. What in the world was he thinking?

By the way, who in the world gave this movie a 2?