stevepat99
A rejoint le sept. 2005
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.
Badges3
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Évaluations154
Note de stevepat99
Avis156
Note de stevepat99
Finally, my hands went way up in the air as I muttered 'ENOUGH'! Cal is a young man who convinces his sister to go on a guided expedition to find big foot. There is so much that could go 'right' with this premise, however, at the half way point it was clear that Cal was an unrepentant arrogant, brainless, psycho who is totally detached from reality. It is one thing to be 'eager' to go it alone into the wilderness, what would likely be a suicide quest, and a quantum leap worse when Cal is willing become a criminal felon to continue his insane quest. Whether Cal does or does not find big foot is irrelevant when the main thrust is to convince us at every turn that Cal is one very sick young man in dire need of appropriate treatment. That being the case there was every reason to abort this utter, nonsensical film. I will add the Jackson Trent did a fine job portraying a brainless, arrogant, psycho Cal.
I fully agree with other one and two star take-downs. At first, lots of promise given the lead actress Amanda Seyfried. However, a horrid script, plot holes the size of black holes, RIDICULOUS ghost interactions and as nonsensical an ending as any 3rd grader might come up with. (At the risk of giving 3rd graders a bad name).
Example: Imagine a sheriff working a case and saying that Mr. X has an alibi and then repeating Mr. X has an alibi. At the same time every viewer knows that Mr. X has no alibi at all. Yes, that makes no sense unless the screenwriter's goal is to treat the audience as flaming idiots.
Then, one after another absurd plot holes finally followed by an inexplicable finale.
And yet two thirds of the way through it seemed it seemed like ths movie might actually be going somewhere. NOT!!!
Example: Imagine a sheriff working a case and saying that Mr. X has an alibi and then repeating Mr. X has an alibi. At the same time every viewer knows that Mr. X has no alibi at all. Yes, that makes no sense unless the screenwriter's goal is to treat the audience as flaming idiots.
Then, one after another absurd plot holes finally followed by an inexplicable finale.
And yet two thirds of the way through it seemed it seemed like ths movie might actually be going somewhere. NOT!!!