gigabyte-me
A rejoint le nov. 2004
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.
Badges2
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Avis15
Note de gigabyte-me
With Disney at the helm, they spared no expense for this fantasy epic.
The special effects are mind blowing for their time. The dragon in Dragonslayer is probably the most realistic dragon ever to be put on celluloid, far better than any CGI dragon in my opinion. I have no idea in fact how they could have made this dragon so realistic in 1981. Unfortunately you don't get to see too much of her throughout the film, but when you do see her for the first time, your jaw will drop.
The acting is great if not a bit campy at times. However the camp in this film adds to the entertainment value, not subtracts from it. There is a dark quality to Dragonslayer, but not so much as to deter the less hearty film enthusiast, just enough to tip the scale from a typical Disney fluff film to a quality fantasy epic. There is also some welcomed dry British humor in this film that offsets Dragonslayer's darker tones.
Even if you don't like the genre, see this film for the effects alone. It makes me wonder if we've taken the wrong path in film making by employing CGI over more visceral stimuli such as animatronics, puppetry and stop motion.
The special effects are mind blowing for their time. The dragon in Dragonslayer is probably the most realistic dragon ever to be put on celluloid, far better than any CGI dragon in my opinion. I have no idea in fact how they could have made this dragon so realistic in 1981. Unfortunately you don't get to see too much of her throughout the film, but when you do see her for the first time, your jaw will drop.
The acting is great if not a bit campy at times. However the camp in this film adds to the entertainment value, not subtracts from it. There is a dark quality to Dragonslayer, but not so much as to deter the less hearty film enthusiast, just enough to tip the scale from a typical Disney fluff film to a quality fantasy epic. There is also some welcomed dry British humor in this film that offsets Dragonslayer's darker tones.
Even if you don't like the genre, see this film for the effects alone. It makes me wonder if we've taken the wrong path in film making by employing CGI over more visceral stimuli such as animatronics, puppetry and stop motion.
Spielberg took a great novel and turned it into blockbuster cotton candy for children and young teenagers.
I couldn't believe what was unfolding before me when I watched this film. Crichton's book was so much richer in detail and much more edge of your seat suspenseful.
I hated the way it was rewritten for the screen and I didn't like how the characters in the film were pale shadows of their book selves. The characters in the book were easy to like. In the movie they were entirely peripheral to the CGI dinosaurs. The magic of the novel was that the characters were equally as important as the peril they faced. In the film it was all about the dinosaurs, the actors might as well have been cardboard cut-outs.
I know people who didn't read the book don't want to hear this kind of thing but trust me if you did read the book first you know what I'm talking about.
I can imagine if I didn't read the book first I would have maybe liked this film more. As it stands I didn't entirely despise it. The scene that properly introduced the first dinosaur for our pleasure was somewhat moving. Yet they didn't save the poor story telling and lousy translation from book to novel. Situations that made the book a great read were entirely omitted from the film in true Hollywood form.
I like Spielberg's work and he's proved his worth but this movie would have been better left to someone who wasn't so hell bent on getting the effects right, while almost completely ignoring the elements of the novel that made Jurassic Park great.
I couldn't believe what was unfolding before me when I watched this film. Crichton's book was so much richer in detail and much more edge of your seat suspenseful.
I hated the way it was rewritten for the screen and I didn't like how the characters in the film were pale shadows of their book selves. The characters in the book were easy to like. In the movie they were entirely peripheral to the CGI dinosaurs. The magic of the novel was that the characters were equally as important as the peril they faced. In the film it was all about the dinosaurs, the actors might as well have been cardboard cut-outs.
I know people who didn't read the book don't want to hear this kind of thing but trust me if you did read the book first you know what I'm talking about.
I can imagine if I didn't read the book first I would have maybe liked this film more. As it stands I didn't entirely despise it. The scene that properly introduced the first dinosaur for our pleasure was somewhat moving. Yet they didn't save the poor story telling and lousy translation from book to novel. Situations that made the book a great read were entirely omitted from the film in true Hollywood form.
I like Spielberg's work and he's proved his worth but this movie would have been better left to someone who wasn't so hell bent on getting the effects right, while almost completely ignoring the elements of the novel that made Jurassic Park great.