32Ford
A rejoint le déc. 2004
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.
Badges2
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Avis7
Note de 32Ford
First off,the acting is first rate. So good that the rest of the cast almost performs at the Gary Oldman level. That's high praise,indeed.
With that out of the way,it seems like the real purpose of this movie was to take a cheap shot at Republicans in general,and conservatives in particular. The Dims are saints,and the Republicans are evil.
This message couldn't be clearer than when Joan Allen gave her little speech about "I'm for a woman's choice,I'm for the government taking the guns out every house in the country",etc,etc,etc.,and the speech she made about leaving the Republican Party because it had shifted away from the values that formed this country. That had nothing to do with movie making,and everything to do with political propaganda. Stalin couldn't have came up with a more left-wing rant.
After all,how can you take a movie seriously when it shows a vice- presidential candidate giving a speech to a committee that states she wants to see every gun in the country confiscated by the government? We are supposed to believe the voters would take a direct assault on the Bill of Rights so casually they would elect someone who said that?
It's a damn shame the director and writers of this movie decided it was more important to make a propaganda film than a movie for entertainment.
Not that the Republicans aren't guilty of sleaze. They most certainly are. They are mere amateurs compared to the Dims,though. As the writing,editing,and directing in this movie proves.
With that out of the way,it seems like the real purpose of this movie was to take a cheap shot at Republicans in general,and conservatives in particular. The Dims are saints,and the Republicans are evil.
This message couldn't be clearer than when Joan Allen gave her little speech about "I'm for a woman's choice,I'm for the government taking the guns out every house in the country",etc,etc,etc.,and the speech she made about leaving the Republican Party because it had shifted away from the values that formed this country. That had nothing to do with movie making,and everything to do with political propaganda. Stalin couldn't have came up with a more left-wing rant.
After all,how can you take a movie seriously when it shows a vice- presidential candidate giving a speech to a committee that states she wants to see every gun in the country confiscated by the government? We are supposed to believe the voters would take a direct assault on the Bill of Rights so casually they would elect someone who said that?
It's a damn shame the director and writers of this movie decided it was more important to make a propaganda film than a movie for entertainment.
Not that the Republicans aren't guilty of sleaze. They most certainly are. They are mere amateurs compared to the Dims,though. As the writing,editing,and directing in this movie proves.
This movie sucks beyond all belief. Not quite as bad as Borak,but close. I downloaded it from amazon.com for $1.99,and want my money back. Other than the guy that played Fink,everybody in the movie overacts to the point of being hammy.
I have no idea why so many of the actors used such horrible southern accents for a movie about life in LA in 1941,but they did.
I see where somebody said it was humorous,but I found it about as funny as tumor day at the children;s hospital.
I have seen several other movies directed by these two brothers,and enjoyed every one of them. Not this stinker,though.
I have no idea why so many of the actors used such horrible southern accents for a movie about life in LA in 1941,but they did.
I see where somebody said it was humorous,but I found it about as funny as tumor day at the children;s hospital.
I have seen several other movies directed by these two brothers,and enjoyed every one of them. Not this stinker,though.
This is probably the worse movie I have ever seen. The best actor in the movie is a bear,and the funniest line is "I want to go to New York where there are no Jews". What little humor there there is in the movie is bathroom humor that the average 8th grader is too sophisticated to laugh at.
The main focus of the movie seems to be denigrating people from eastern Europe and the southern United States. Unless they are black,of course. If they are black,Borat enjoys his time with them and learns things.
I thought I would never see a movie worse than Showgirls. I was wrong. The people that produced this horror and inflicted it on the public should be sued.
The main focus of the movie seems to be denigrating people from eastern Europe and the southern United States. Unless they are black,of course. If they are black,Borat enjoys his time with them and learns things.
I thought I would never see a movie worse than Showgirls. I was wrong. The people that produced this horror and inflicted it on the public should be sued.