dreadur

IMDb says 7 out of 10 for this movie. Before i watched it I read a few reviews that claimed it was true to the boondock-concept etc etc. I absolutely loved the first movie. This movie on the other hand is a total disgrace. Not only to the "Boondock concept" (if there is such a thing?) but to all movies that rate around 7 here on IMDb. How the hell can the this be the same director and almost the same cast as the last movie and still result in this?! The director must have been on drugs for the last 10 years after the first movie. I cant find anything good about this movie so there's no real need to point out good/bad stuff. Other reviewers have done that.

At one time I actually thought they'd had to have switched some of the actors from the first movie and just made them look like the macmanus brothers, because an actor should have got better after 10 years no?

Not much it seems. The genre says "comedy/horror". Im pretty sure this genre represent the worse of the worst when it comes to low budget films. Most low budget films are horror but when they turn out really bad you add them to "comedy" and hope some people will laugh because its so horribly bad. Im not even sure I can rate it as other movies since its just stuff put on tape. Of course even the title gave a hint that this would be a bad movie but I expected at least some nice nude scenes or something. There was an attempt at a nude scene where a topless girl pose in a bar with some sort of hockey mask but it would've taken a hell of a lot more to lift this movie from a firm "1".

Rated as a low budget horror movie: 1

There were quotes on the cover saying stuff like "...the best zombie movie ever made!". There is no way in hell anyone (drugged, insane, undead etc), could state such at thing after seeing this "movie". Talk about false advertisement.

I love a good horror flick and a friend of mine had rented 3 of them but we only had time to watch one. I got to choose which one. Well... That wont happen again I tell you.

3 reasons to avoid this film at all costs:

• Horrible horrible story/script. It has the same plot as every other zombie/living dead movie ever made, only devoid of all the interesting parts.

• The horrible horrible 1st person photography. Reminded me of a 10-min zombie movie me and my friend did when we were 14.

• This is not a horror movie. Its a horrible horrible movie in every possible way.

3 questions you most certainly will ask yourself after this movie:

• Why oh why?! - How the hell did this movie end up on a shelf in my video store? - Can I please have that 1 hour and 15 mins of my life back?

(note: Why does IMDb "name" a 1 rating as only "awful"? Giving this movie a 1 is therefor almost an insult to all the awful movies out there.)