[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de sortiesLes 250 meilleurs filmsLes films les plus populairesRechercher des films par genreMeilleur box officeHoraires et billetsActualités du cinémaPleins feux sur le cinéma indien
    Ce qui est diffusé à la télévision et en streamingLes 250 meilleures sériesÉmissions de télévision les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités télévisées
    Que regarderLes dernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbGuide de divertissement pour la famillePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Né aujourd'huiLes célébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d'aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels de l'industrie
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli

perfectisolation

A rejoint le juil. 2002
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.

Badges2

Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Découvrir les badges

Avis23

Note de perfectisolation
Police fédérale, Los Angeles

Police fédérale, Los Angeles

7,3
2
  • 15 août 2004
  • Horrible. why such a high rating? Friedkin, you suck.

    The writing, direction, and editing are horrific. I've never said that before about any other movie. Lines like "i like the rain." "oh yeah? Groovy." Within 3 minutes of the movie starting, the senior partner goes "I am too old for this." Of course, he is days away from retiring, and within the next 2 minutes (after his partner warned that he should come with him to this place, he gets killed. there is no character development whatsoever. the only reason we are given that the bad guy's lawyer turns him in is that "he was beginning to order me around like i was one of his mules". are you kidding me? no f@#king lawyer would ever ruin his future (practice or life) and so casually decide to do it while having breakfast with an secret service person.

    this movie is so unrealistic and so stupid. we have no idea how any of these guys get there tips, how they end up meeting people. how did they end up at a quadraplegic artist's loft who happens to tell him that the bad guy's studio is somewhere downtown near a garage with a Chinese sign on it. Cut to agent walking up to garage sign with Chinese character on it. LA is enormous!!!!! how the hell did he find it? especially since we track the agent walking up to it and you can see that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to casually see it.

    how come the bad guy knows when one of his contacts is being watched by the two agents, but yet doesn't even know who they are when they go into business with him. how come the head agent happens to be sleeping with the stripper/prostitute who is the only person in town who magically always gets the information? oh gawd i am getting an ulcer from the utter mediocrity that this movie is.

    argh, it only gets worse. the direction is so bad. what the hell happened to friedkin? was he really a two trick pony? he throws in scenes that are completely unnecessary. why does dafoe need to be naked (gonads protected by a grocery paper bag) throwing money into a fire with a strategically placed naked lady in the background? Why does the guy talk non stop about BASE jumping (especially when it doesn't fit into his character whatsoever). Was it new and friedkin wanted to be hip? how the hell did the guys know to stop on the bridge and find the guys below?

    Best direction point: Why would the prison murder attempt be done in broad daylight and so obviously that the mark escapes? I mean shoot, Turturro is able to get away from FOUR big black dudes. Couldn't freidkin be more inventive in shooting the scene? he view of the attempt is two guys with enormous 'fros walking menacingly, scowling straight at him. they they jump on top of him, and still cant stab him. a high school kid could think of a better way to come up with an attempt. and, 90% of the way in, all of a sudden there are titles on the bottom of the screen, declaring the day and time. how odd is that? there hasn't been ANY in the ENTIRE movie. So why now?

    Look, every movie can have holes shot through it, but these aren't holes, they just don't make sense and are the result of horrible, horrible writing and directing. this movie isn't a sci fi movie, it isn't asking you to suspend disbelief. It just makes no sense that a guy gets killed even though his place is under surveillance and then a cop car comes up to his house, turns off his headlights while still up the block, pulls into the driveway, and then RUNS into the house and discovers the dead body. Why? it is 4am so the guy's secretary didn't find him dead (shoot, the agents watching him are still asleep CUZ it's dark outside) and the guys used a silencer to kill him. Who called it in? why the the cop show up? turn off his lights before he pulled up to the house? Why did he run in?

    In fact, what the hell does this have to do LA? This movie could have been placed in a "town" of 10,000 people. why live and die in LA?

    I have *NEVER* vented like this. But I have never been tormented by such crap that is supposed to be an 'A' movie.
    Quand la panthère rose s'emmêle

    Quand la panthère rose s'emmêle

    7,1
    10
  • 13 juil. 2004
  • Brilliancy for Panther fans!

    the second or third sequel (does that make it the 3rd or 4th film?) in the Panther series, it may be the test. Over the movies, most people come to love Inspector Dreyfus, the head of the Seurat, the french police, and the seemingly is the only man in the world who knows that Clouseau is a fool and not brilliant.

    But cameos no more my friends! Dreyfus is now mortal enemy number one, and plays the bad guy role to perfection in this movie. However, one needs to watch the other movies first to get a clue and an appreciation for the non-Clouseau characters.

    Within the first 15 minutes are some of the best comedy scenes ever! :

    1. Clouseau at Dreyfus' looney bin (giving a how! to a patient wearing an Indian chief hat and getting something in return)

    2. Clouseau's reverse cpr but gay sex to old women (in and out, in and out, pervert! Dirty old men!)

    3. Parallel to stairs to room everyone is in. steps on lady's foot, destroy armor. Fights with butler. And that's before the integration scene. Killer stuff!

    4. The gay bar scene (hey back in 60's drag shows were not acceptable fun nights out. Only gay men, women went. Only)

    murderous. I was dying, rolling on the sofa.

    Genius people, genius!
    Le Grand Bleu

    Le Grand Bleu

    7,5
    10
  • 9 juil. 2004
  • Very Devise Movie (look at other reviews!), I'm on the brilliant side

    yada yada...beautiful cinematography..yada yada... Jean Reno, Luc Besson....yada yada.

    all reviews are mostly the same so i wont repeat them.

    what i will say it that it will be an amazing DVD rental if and only if: you will watch it in the dark with no distractions.

    if you will watch it with lights on, while reading a book, surfing the internet, talking to your spouse/girlfriend/kids, this movie (especially extended cut) will be HORRIBLE so stay away.

    Besson creates a visual world in this movie and the slow pace necessitates the viewers full attention. that way one becomes lost in the grandeur of the movie and cinematography. If the lights are on while you watch, you cannot be lost in that world. if you aren't focused on the movie but reading People magazine, it seems slow, you miss out on dialogue and slowly you could care less because you don't know what is going on and there are no scenes where there is story exposition.

    let;s put it this way, drop any in on any scene of die hard (without ever having scene it before) any one gets the gist of the movie pretty quickly. ditto for pretty woman. people dislike this movie because they don't really turn off the lights, sit quietly, and just watch the movie. as a background movie it is torture.

    great movie to watch byoneself on a Saturday night.

    8.5
    Voir tous les commentaires

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.