Cindy-39
A rejoint le août 2000
Bienvenue sur nouveau profil
Nos mises à jour sont toujours en cours de développement. Bien que la version précédente de le profil ne soit plus accessible, nous travaillons activement à des améliorations, et certaines fonctionnalités manquantes seront bientôt de retour ! Restez à l'écoute de leur retour. En attendant, l’analyse des évaluations est toujours disponible sur nos applications iOS et Android, qui se trouvent sur la page de profil. Pour consulter la répartition de vos évaluations par année et par genre, veuillez consulter notre nouveau Guide d'aide.
Badges2
Pour savoir comment gagner des badges, rendez-vous sur page d'aide sur les badges.
Avis30
Note de Cindy-39
Isn't it odd that this movie shares so many similarities with
Charles Burnett's "To Sleep With Anger" (1990)? They are very
different genres, but both films feature a stranger who imposes
himself upon an unhappy family and eventually seems to solve
their problems when they get rid of him. And in both, the stranger's
name is, surprise, Harry.
I went into the theater knowing next to nothing about this film, and
am surprised to learn that it won so many awards and bore so
many comparisons to Hitchcock. I wouldn't give it that much, but
"Harry" is a thoroughly enjoyable film. It's well paced (okay, so the
second half seems to move alarmingly fast, but I say well paced in
that the 2 hour running time flies by nicely) , and the cast is pitch
perfect.
Special kudos to Laurent Lucas and Mathilde Seigner who are
completely realistic as a weary young family, in a story that is
otherwise implausible (though no one goes to see a dark comedy/ thriller for realism). One can't help thinking that if this were
Hollywood, they would randomly match up an attractive actor and
actress who wouldn't know the difference between a diaper and,
well, another diaper. But Lucas and Mathilde, both of whom are
quite attractive by the way, are so convincing as the young parents.
It gives strength to the family element, which is depicted as both
the cause of the main character Michel's problems as well as what
he is constantly fighting to defend. And of course, Sergi Lopez
seems to be having a blast as the slithery, charming psychopath.
"With a Friend Like Harry" is not suspenseful like traditional
thrillers, but that may be an asset. It is a film that you can just sit
back, relax, and enjoy. Plus, enough subtext and character
development to keep from being just another throwaway dark
comedy. And did I mention the great views of the lush French
countryside?
Charles Burnett's "To Sleep With Anger" (1990)? They are very
different genres, but both films feature a stranger who imposes
himself upon an unhappy family and eventually seems to solve
their problems when they get rid of him. And in both, the stranger's
name is, surprise, Harry.
I went into the theater knowing next to nothing about this film, and
am surprised to learn that it won so many awards and bore so
many comparisons to Hitchcock. I wouldn't give it that much, but
"Harry" is a thoroughly enjoyable film. It's well paced (okay, so the
second half seems to move alarmingly fast, but I say well paced in
that the 2 hour running time flies by nicely) , and the cast is pitch
perfect.
Special kudos to Laurent Lucas and Mathilde Seigner who are
completely realistic as a weary young family, in a story that is
otherwise implausible (though no one goes to see a dark comedy/ thriller for realism). One can't help thinking that if this were
Hollywood, they would randomly match up an attractive actor and
actress who wouldn't know the difference between a diaper and,
well, another diaper. But Lucas and Mathilde, both of whom are
quite attractive by the way, are so convincing as the young parents.
It gives strength to the family element, which is depicted as both
the cause of the main character Michel's problems as well as what
he is constantly fighting to defend. And of course, Sergi Lopez
seems to be having a blast as the slithery, charming psychopath.
"With a Friend Like Harry" is not suspenseful like traditional
thrillers, but that may be an asset. It is a film that you can just sit
back, relax, and enjoy. Plus, enough subtext and character
development to keep from being just another throwaway dark
comedy. And did I mention the great views of the lush French
countryside?
I could easily say that Curb Your Enthusiasm is the best sitcom currently being made, but that doesn't say much being that the competition is so poor. Believe me - I didn't expect to like the show at first - it just didn't look especially appealing, but it turns out to be brilliant. If I had to describe it, I'd say Curb Your Enthusiasm combines the neurosis and talkativeness of a Woody Allen movie with the cynicism and hint, hint,wink, wink celebrity appearances of The Larry Sanders Show.
Pi suffers from what I call the explain-it-to-the-audience syndrome,
where the filmmaker is convinced that he knows something we
don't, and feels the need to explain it to us. So whenever a
character speaks, either directly to us in a voice over, or indirectly
through a conversation with another character (though it is still
obviously directed at us), he is "teaching" us about some concept -
numbers, the golden rectangle, etc. It's not only pretentious, but
takes away any sort of realism in the characters, since they are not
allowed to carry on as any real human being would. It's hard to get
absorbed into Pi, because you can feel the director's presence
looming over every scene. It makes the movie very tedious to
watch. Unless, of course, you're in the mood to be talked down to.
where the filmmaker is convinced that he knows something we
don't, and feels the need to explain it to us. So whenever a
character speaks, either directly to us in a voice over, or indirectly
through a conversation with another character (though it is still
obviously directed at us), he is "teaching" us about some concept -
numbers, the golden rectangle, etc. It's not only pretentious, but
takes away any sort of realism in the characters, since they are not
allowed to carry on as any real human being would. It's hard to get
absorbed into Pi, because you can feel the director's presence
looming over every scene. It makes the movie very tedious to
watch. Unless, of course, you're in the mood to be talked down to.