NOTE IMDb
5,1/10
2,6 k
MA NOTE
Sam Lord, un sniper professionnel en burn-out se retrouve piégé dans un appartement tout en verre par un assassin concurrent. Il va devoir trouver un moyen de survivre et de s'échapper.Sam Lord, un sniper professionnel en burn-out se retrouve piégé dans un appartement tout en verre par un assassin concurrent. Il va devoir trouver un moyen de survivre et de s'échapper.Sam Lord, un sniper professionnel en burn-out se retrouve piégé dans un appartement tout en verre par un assassin concurrent. Il va devoir trouver un moyen de survivre et de s'échapper.
Madalina Bellariu Ion
- Mona
- (as Madalina Bellariu)
Ada Michaels-Mason
- The Blonde
- (as Adrianna Michaels)
Obie Matthew
- Mercenary
- (non crédité)
Patrick Pearson
- Undercover Police Officer
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
Professional mercenary sniper Sam Lorde (Scott Adkins) finds himself in the middle of an existential crisis when he accidentally kills an innocent who throws herself in front of his intended victim. He contacts his remote boss and tells her he wants to leave the business. The boss is very disappointed but books him and his spotter Ken (Jack Parr) into a posh hotel where she'll meet them to go through formalities. However, someone else knows they are there and they are out for vengeance...
Right let's say the good things first. By the end of the film, it's quite feel good and you've enjoyed a convoluted story. I very much liked the performance of Madalina Bellariu Ion who plays call girl Mona. Perhaps the best performance of the entire film.
Right, the dogs ears...the script is truly awful. The non stop pseudo-hateful banter between Sam and Ken is acutely badly written and sounds as fake as it is. Fight scenes are pretty poor. Acting is pretty poor. Verbalised emotions are half felt and not explored properly. There are so many plot holes it borders on ridiculous, and there's too much melodrama from poor actors.
Having said all of that the story while not new at all, isn't bad. If this film had great actors and a top end director it probably would have been pretty good. As it was it wasn't dire, it just wasn't very well produced or directed in so many ways. I have had a very tasty and enjoyable dinner so I am in a great mood and I give it a 5.
Right, the dogs ears...the script is truly awful. The non stop pseudo-hateful banter between Sam and Ken is acutely badly written and sounds as fake as it is. Fight scenes are pretty poor. Acting is pretty poor. Verbalised emotions are half felt and not explored properly. There are so many plot holes it borders on ridiculous, and there's too much melodrama from poor actors.
Having said all of that the story while not new at all, isn't bad. If this film had great actors and a top end director it probably would have been pretty good. As it was it wasn't dire, it just wasn't very well produced or directed in so many ways. I have had a very tasty and enjoyable dinner so I am in a great mood and I give it a 5.
The writing is just dreadful. From the cringeworthy opening conversation between Sam and Ken to the closing scene there isn't anything good. The script is laughable.
Even the fight scenes are slightly below par which is unusual for an Adkins movie.
I was pleased at the hit squad completely destroying the bar area, but failing to hit the fish tank. No one likes seeing fish getting shot up, do they?
Even though they are trapped in the apartment, there is very little in the way of tension. For some reason, they are struggling to close the curtains and there are a few times when they could leave by the door.
The high reviews on here are obviously fake. If you feel you must, then watch it and judge for yourself. This Scott Adkins fan is very dissappointed.
Even the fight scenes are slightly below par which is unusual for an Adkins movie.
I was pleased at the hit squad completely destroying the bar area, but failing to hit the fish tank. No one likes seeing fish getting shot up, do they?
Even though they are trapped in the apartment, there is very little in the way of tension. For some reason, they are struggling to close the curtains and there are a few times when they could leave by the door.
The high reviews on here are obviously fake. If you feel you must, then watch it and judge for yourself. This Scott Adkins fan is very dissappointed.
As usual, Scott Adkins is as good as it gets. But when you have a terrible script, two likable actors in the lead are wasted in silly, inane, predictable style. He is 10 times the actor and the martial artist that jvcd ever was. But for reasons I cannot explain, he gets stuck in b minus movies like these. Most of the movie takes place at the penthouse of a hotel room where they duck behind a sofa for cover,. Yes a sofa which has bullet holes through it as if a sniper couldn't just pepper it and kill everyone and end the movie.
Accident man is one of Atkins best including avengement. Stick with those, skip this..
Accident man is one of Atkins best including avengement. Stick with those, skip this..
The action scenes are outstanding, but there isn't a lot of it. The dialogue was pretty clunky and the writing is basic, there were a lot of scenes that seemed unnecessarily long and drawn out, but when it does get to the juicy parts, it doesn't disappoint. Not Adkins' best work, but as always, he played his part spectacularly, always reminds us why he's the gold standard for action and martial arts in cinema. I would recommend, but also urge to watch some of his other work that's a little more solid, Accident Man and Debt Collector are good starters to go down the rabbit hole. Was hoping for something that stood out a little more, since the Hulu release can draw a lot of attention, but it is what it is.
It is not like it is some great story, but it is decent enough. I am not saying more, because I do not want to spoil. It is true, though, that the script is terrible - the conversations! Just awful. The characters are not that bad, it is all in the conversations.
You won't see the best of Scott Adkins' fighting, but that is not the idea, as he is supposed to be differently skilled. And the situation he and his teammate got stuck in is a good idea. So overall, I am rating the movie six stars, which is ok on my scale, as five and below is bad to worst. And to be honest, I think there are worse action movies (and movies overall) being on cinema, pretending that they aren't crap.
You won't see the best of Scott Adkins' fighting, but that is not the idea, as he is supposed to be differently skilled. And the situation he and his teammate got stuck in is a good idea. So overall, I am rating the movie six stars, which is ok on my scale, as five and below is bad to worst. And to be honest, I think there are worse action movies (and movies overall) being on cinema, pretending that they aren't crap.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesFilming began on June 19, 2023 in England
- GaffesIn the beginning scene Sam is cleaning a rifle barrel. He uses a nylon brush on a rod which is standard practice. However you never clean a rifle barrel from the end as he did. You always brush the barrel bore from the chamber end so that any loose deposits come out the end of the barrel and not into the breech workings..
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Take Cover?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 30 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Take Cover (2024)?
Répondre