Suit un studio de cinéma hollywoodien qui cherche à survivre dans un monde où il est de plus en plus difficile pour l'art et les affaires de vivre ensemble.Suit un studio de cinéma hollywoodien qui cherche à survivre dans un monde où il est de plus en plus difficile pour l'art et les affaires de vivre ensemble.Suit un studio de cinéma hollywoodien qui cherche à survivre dans un monde où il est de plus en plus difficile pour l'art et les affaires de vivre ensemble.
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 16 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
The Studio is another hit in a long line of hits for Apple TV+. Apple has been absolutely killing it with all their shows and The Studio is no different. I knew this was going to be good by the cast alone. What a cast! If leads like Seth Rogen, Catherine O'Hara, Kathryn Hahn, Ike Barinholtz, and Chase Sui Wonders aren't enough, there are plenty of huge cameos like Martin Scorsese, Zac Efron, Bryan Cranston, Anthony Mackie, Charlize Theron, Paul Dano, Usher, etc. Rogen and Evan Goldberg direct all 10 episodes. This is one of the better shows to come out this year so far and I'd be shocked if this doesn't win a ton of awards come award season. The only negative is that we have to wait a week between shows because this is definitely a show that you want to binge.
A few notes about two very different shows I've been watching at the same time . . .
THE STUDIO: Low Subtext, Low Withholding
The characters say everything they're thinking. Like in Curb Your Enthusiasm. We never have to guess. We know. Because they blurt it out. Sooner or later. When they just can't hold it in any longer. And of course, we foresee the blowup. And eagerly anticipate the showdown!
That's what makes The Studio funny--when it is funny: unfiltered, on-the-nose dialogue-driven storytelling. Paired with some terrific slapstick, all set on a studio lot or against pleasing modern or vintage LA interiors and exteriors.
After all, as I say in my book Visual Ef9ects, "Architecture is the stage set for the drama of life."
The comedy of life!
Seth Rogen and his co-writers don't withhold a whole lot from the audience. Basically every thought, purpose, and endgame gets aired. And the episodes pretty much follow a Law & Order-like format: beginning, middle, and end. No real overarching narrative. No true cliffhangers. The Studio runs on sitcom conventions--low subtext, low withholding--to hook and hold us.
Lights, Camera, Talk.
Still, the few times the writers do withhold--usually not a plot point but a gag line or a thematic reveal like in Episode 4, "The Missing Reel," with its hilarious, brilliant nod to T. S. Eliot and Chinatown--they nail it. Setup and payoff: fun and funny. Sharp, intelligent, inspired story design.
At least that was true at first.
The first four episodes rock. So does Episode 8. But the last two episodes don't. And I found Episode 6 unwatchable.
What started out as Hollywood-insider, movie-history-smart comedy ends as a dud.
Too bad. Because at its best--for five of the ten episodes: pretty much genius.
. . . . . . . . . . .
ANDOR: High Subtext, High Withholding
Unlike The Studio, Andor relies on a range of storytelling devices that go well beyond dialogue. And Andor's dialogue itself springs from a different mindset.
Yes, like The Studio, sometimes Andor's dialogue is on the nose: the characters say what they're thinking, how they're feeling, what they're planning. They speak the truth.
But a crucial aspect of the show's brilliance lies in the dialogue's subtext. Both in the words spoken and unspoken. What's said and what isn't.
Ambiguity. Silence. Withholding.
We're not handed everything. We have to work for it. Figure it out. Guess. Wonder.
And wait . . .
Take Syril Karn. His arc evolves into something enigmatic. The writers shape him through restraint and mystery. And shape the world of Andor through the same artistic devices: implication, not exposition. Unresolved riddles, not explicit answers.
Tony Gilroy brings the same storytelling maturity to this series as he did to his screenplays for Michael Clayton and Rogue One, the sequel to Andor. Gilroy and the other writers, including his brother Dan, apply lessons learned from Babylon Berlin, the great German series whose impact Tony Gilroy has discussed in interviews.
You can see Babylon Berlin's shaping influence at work in Gilroy's design of his complex protagonist, a reluctant hero, Cassian Andor.
Not as fully developed as Babylon Berlin's Gereon Rath. But save for a few iconic series characters like Breaking Bad's Walter White, who is?
Andor sometimes withholds effect: the outcome of an action. Which is to say, the show doesn't always reveal the result of an action right away. Instead, Andor shows the action that precedes the effect but then waits--sometimes until much later--to reveal what actually occurred but wasn't shown.
At other times, Andor shows only the effect but not the action that caused it, leaving us to wonder who did what.
Unusual, powerful techniques.
Take the Season 2, Episode 3 marriage gala scene involving Luthen, Mon, and her childhood friend Tay. Wrapped in innuendo and ambiguity. We have to guess what's going on. The writers don't tell or show, and they don't bring up the significance of the scene until episodes later. And even then, the characters never spell it out.
It's all unsaid.
In the finale of the marriage scene, Mon's dance scene, you really see Gilroy's homage to Babylon Berlin and feel the haunting power of subtext and storytelling through implication. The arena of intrigue, mystery, suspense: the stuff of sci-fi thrillers and political dramas. And in Andor, that suspense lies in what's hidden. What's between the lines.
What's withheld.
As we experience the slow-building tension toward the series's conclusion and puzzle our way through the nature of the story's characters' true intentions and DNA, we're sure of only a few things:
Cassian, along with the other characters who appear in Rogue One--including Senator Bail Organa, Princess Leia's adoptive father--will not die. We're in for a ride of grave, unforeseen twists and turns. And the writers know exactly what they're doing as they spin their subtle but vivid, multi-layered, epic yarn. Beautifully rendered by the talented Disney team.
(Note, now that I've watched it all: How about that late tonal shift? Comic relief in the spirit of the original Star Wars, 1977, thanks to droid K-2SO. Brave move. Fun. But of course, not the biggest surprise. Wow.)
Pretty much genius.
Created by an oracle.
Hint. Hint.
THE STUDIO: Low Subtext, Low Withholding
The characters say everything they're thinking. Like in Curb Your Enthusiasm. We never have to guess. We know. Because they blurt it out. Sooner or later. When they just can't hold it in any longer. And of course, we foresee the blowup. And eagerly anticipate the showdown!
That's what makes The Studio funny--when it is funny: unfiltered, on-the-nose dialogue-driven storytelling. Paired with some terrific slapstick, all set on a studio lot or against pleasing modern or vintage LA interiors and exteriors.
After all, as I say in my book Visual Ef9ects, "Architecture is the stage set for the drama of life."
The comedy of life!
Seth Rogen and his co-writers don't withhold a whole lot from the audience. Basically every thought, purpose, and endgame gets aired. And the episodes pretty much follow a Law & Order-like format: beginning, middle, and end. No real overarching narrative. No true cliffhangers. The Studio runs on sitcom conventions--low subtext, low withholding--to hook and hold us.
Lights, Camera, Talk.
Still, the few times the writers do withhold--usually not a plot point but a gag line or a thematic reveal like in Episode 4, "The Missing Reel," with its hilarious, brilliant nod to T. S. Eliot and Chinatown--they nail it. Setup and payoff: fun and funny. Sharp, intelligent, inspired story design.
At least that was true at first.
The first four episodes rock. So does Episode 8. But the last two episodes don't. And I found Episode 6 unwatchable.
What started out as Hollywood-insider, movie-history-smart comedy ends as a dud.
Too bad. Because at its best--for five of the ten episodes: pretty much genius.
. . . . . . . . . . .
ANDOR: High Subtext, High Withholding
Unlike The Studio, Andor relies on a range of storytelling devices that go well beyond dialogue. And Andor's dialogue itself springs from a different mindset.
Yes, like The Studio, sometimes Andor's dialogue is on the nose: the characters say what they're thinking, how they're feeling, what they're planning. They speak the truth.
But a crucial aspect of the show's brilliance lies in the dialogue's subtext. Both in the words spoken and unspoken. What's said and what isn't.
Ambiguity. Silence. Withholding.
We're not handed everything. We have to work for it. Figure it out. Guess. Wonder.
And wait . . .
Take Syril Karn. His arc evolves into something enigmatic. The writers shape him through restraint and mystery. And shape the world of Andor through the same artistic devices: implication, not exposition. Unresolved riddles, not explicit answers.
Tony Gilroy brings the same storytelling maturity to this series as he did to his screenplays for Michael Clayton and Rogue One, the sequel to Andor. Gilroy and the other writers, including his brother Dan, apply lessons learned from Babylon Berlin, the great German series whose impact Tony Gilroy has discussed in interviews.
You can see Babylon Berlin's shaping influence at work in Gilroy's design of his complex protagonist, a reluctant hero, Cassian Andor.
Not as fully developed as Babylon Berlin's Gereon Rath. But save for a few iconic series characters like Breaking Bad's Walter White, who is?
Andor sometimes withholds effect: the outcome of an action. Which is to say, the show doesn't always reveal the result of an action right away. Instead, Andor shows the action that precedes the effect but then waits--sometimes until much later--to reveal what actually occurred but wasn't shown.
At other times, Andor shows only the effect but not the action that caused it, leaving us to wonder who did what.
Unusual, powerful techniques.
Take the Season 2, Episode 3 marriage gala scene involving Luthen, Mon, and her childhood friend Tay. Wrapped in innuendo and ambiguity. We have to guess what's going on. The writers don't tell or show, and they don't bring up the significance of the scene until episodes later. And even then, the characters never spell it out.
It's all unsaid.
In the finale of the marriage scene, Mon's dance scene, you really see Gilroy's homage to Babylon Berlin and feel the haunting power of subtext and storytelling through implication. The arena of intrigue, mystery, suspense: the stuff of sci-fi thrillers and political dramas. And in Andor, that suspense lies in what's hidden. What's between the lines.
What's withheld.
As we experience the slow-building tension toward the series's conclusion and puzzle our way through the nature of the story's characters' true intentions and DNA, we're sure of only a few things:
Cassian, along with the other characters who appear in Rogue One--including Senator Bail Organa, Princess Leia's adoptive father--will not die. We're in for a ride of grave, unforeseen twists and turns. And the writers know exactly what they're doing as they spin their subtle but vivid, multi-layered, epic yarn. Beautifully rendered by the talented Disney team.
(Note, now that I've watched it all: How about that late tonal shift? Comic relief in the spirit of the original Star Wars, 1977, thanks to droid K-2SO. Brave move. Fun. But of course, not the biggest surprise. Wow.)
Pretty much genius.
Created by an oracle.
Hint. Hint.
I'll be very sad if this one doesn't come back for another season. Nevertheless, I imagine the showrunners have been thrilled to see their work faithfully spring to life, vision in-tact. Very seldom do you watch a show free of a blemish episode here and there... such is not the case with The Studio. From beginning to finale, every episode is a standalone wild ride to somewhere new. Whether you are a fan of Seth Rogen or otherwise, so long as you share even a tenth of this show's love of television and cinema you will find The Studio to be a worthwhile watch. Come not for any overarching storyline or plot but for the old school Hollywood ride.
I mean it's just really good. Super funny, super fast and so much interesting (for me) commentary on the entertainment industry. The only thing that confused me is that Seth goes from a semi low-level position to a studio head, and the amount of work they do is actually insane. I mean maybe I'm the odd one out on this but I had no idea how insane that job is-and Matt didn't really seem stressed about his experience level. That doesn't really take a way from anything though, and I like the fact that they don't focus on his journey per-say but do so much cool stuff about the reality of filmmaking. The show also has me so stressed.. it's just really well made. Ok everyone else's reviews sound a lot smarter but the cast is mind blowing and I feel like this type of thing hasn't really been done before. A weird feeling you get when watching tv about making tv. No more notes.
The Studio is nothing short of a comedic masterclass. I went in expecting to laugh (it's Seth Rogen, after all), but I wasn't prepared for just how smart, layered, and downright brilliant this show would be. It's not just funny - it's clever. The kind of funny that sticks with you, with punchlines that land hard and then somehow keep echoing in your head days later.
The characters are instantly lovable, weirdly relatable, and played with such precision and charm that you forget they're actors - it feels like you're eavesdropping on real chaos. And the writing? Absolutely top-tier. Every episode zips by with whip-smart dialogue, hilarious set pieces, and a surprising amount of heart.
But what really blew me away was the direction. The pacing, the visual timing of the jokes, the stylish flourishes - it's clear this isn't just a funny show, it's a well-made one. Seth Rogen has crafted something that's not only hilarious but cinematic and fresh.
Hands down, one of the most original and entertaining comedies I've seen in ages. It's bold, it's brilliant, and it knows exactly what it's doing.
The characters are instantly lovable, weirdly relatable, and played with such precision and charm that you forget they're actors - it feels like you're eavesdropping on real chaos. And the writing? Absolutely top-tier. Every episode zips by with whip-smart dialogue, hilarious set pieces, and a surprising amount of heart.
But what really blew me away was the direction. The pacing, the visual timing of the jokes, the stylish flourishes - it's clear this isn't just a funny show, it's a well-made one. Seth Rogen has crafted something that's not only hilarious but cinematic and fresh.
Hands down, one of the most original and entertaining comedies I've seen in ages. It's bold, it's brilliant, and it knows exactly what it's doing.
"The Studio" Cast Receives an IMDb STARmeter Award
"The Studio" Cast Receives an IMDb STARmeter Award
"The Studio" cast are joined by creators Evan Golderg, Frida Perez, and James Weaver to receive the IMDb STARmeter Award at the 2025 SXSW Film Festival.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe character Griffin Mill has the same name as Tim Robbins's character in The Player, where he runs a movie studio.
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 TV Shows of 2025 So Far (2025)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Chuyện Hãng Phim
- Lieux de tournage
- Warner Bros. Television - Bldg. 140 - 4000 Warner Boulevard, Burbank, Californie, États-Unis(As the Continental Studio offices in the style of Frank Lloyd Wright. Interiors and exterior shots. Several of the offices on the Warner Brothers Burbank Studios lot are designed to be re-purposed for movies or TV shows. Building 140 has doubles as a public library, offices or government buildings in many film and television programs since the 70s.)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
- Durée1 heure 9 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant