Rien n'est ce qu'il semble être lorsqu'un coup d'un soir tordu se transforme en une série de meurtres vicieux perpétrés par un tueur en série.Rien n'est ce qu'il semble être lorsqu'un coup d'un soir tordu se transforme en une série de meurtres vicieux perpétrés par un tueur en série.Rien n'est ce qu'il semble être lorsqu'un coup d'un soir tordu se transforme en une série de meurtres vicieux perpétrés par un tueur en série.
- Récompenses
- 6 victoires et 17 nominations au total
Sheri Foster
- The Driver
- (as Sheri Foster Blake)
Résumé
Reviewers say 'Strange Darling' is a psychological thriller with a non-linear narrative that explores power dynamics and societal expectations. Giovanni Ribisi's cinematography is lauded for its artistry, while Willa Fitzgerald and Kyle Gallner deliver intense performances. The soundtrack enhances the suspenseful atmosphere. Some find the plot predictable and characters underdeveloped, but others appreciate its subversive storytelling and complex themes.
Avis à la une
I read a review that said do not read the reviews and go in to the theatre as blind as possible and that was great advice! I only saw the trailer one time. This was a beautifully shot 35 millimeter horror action thriller that is shown out of order for best shock and surprises, great lighting. Very well casted and acted. The action and gore FX, wardrobe, and car choices are all on point. I dont want to give anything away so will keep this review vague. Worth seeing in the theatre vs waiting to stream. This was far better than other recent horror films out including the lame Longlegs and the weird as hell Cuckoo movies. I highly recommend this film 8/10.
You know that moment when a movie gets lots of buzz and you are really excited to see why everyone loves it so much and once you get to watch the movie it ends up as a pretty underwhelming experience. That's what "Strange Darling" was to me. Even though on a technical level the movie was top notch with some great shots, amazing acting and a rather unique story. You could tell that the production value was pretty solid and there is definitely some talent in front of and behind the camera. However for me a movie is mostly about enjoyment and entertainment and I was honestly rarely entertained. The movie definitely wasn't bad and since it has a non-linear storytelling, it was also able to keep my attention to figure out how exactly the whole situation escalated so much. However I caught myself checking the clock multiple times and I was waiting for something spectacular to happen. Like I said, maybe it was the really high rating that ensured my underwhelming watching experience but for me this movie was nothing out of the ordinary and just a decent made Horror-Thriller with some great performances, especially from Willa Fitzgerald who I recognize from Mike Flanagan's "The Fall of the House of Usher". Watch it for yourself to make up your own mind but I think the current rating of 7.5 is strangely high. [5,4/10]
Recently watched Strange Darling, and I have to admit, I was left feeling a bit disappointed. The premise-a one-night stand spiraling into a serial killer's murder spree-sounded thrilling, but unfortunately, I saw the twist coming too early, which really affected my enjoyment.
While I appreciate that many people praised the acting, I personally found it lacking. The performances didn't resonate with me the way I had hoped, and instead of drawing me into the story, they kept me at arm's length. I wanted to connect with the characters, but their portrayals fell flat for my taste.
Additionally, the pacing of the movie felt off. It seemed to drag on longer than necessary, making it hard for me to stay engaged. I found myself checking the time, which is never a good sign in a thriller. The buildup felt drawn out, and by the time the action picked up, I was already losing interest.
Overall, while Strage Darling had the potential for something gripping, the predictable twist and the pacing issues really detracted from my experience. I can see why some might enjoy it, but for me, it just didn't hit the mark.
While I appreciate that many people praised the acting, I personally found it lacking. The performances didn't resonate with me the way I had hoped, and instead of drawing me into the story, they kept me at arm's length. I wanted to connect with the characters, but their portrayals fell flat for my taste.
Additionally, the pacing of the movie felt off. It seemed to drag on longer than necessary, making it hard for me to stay engaged. I found myself checking the time, which is never a good sign in a thriller. The buildup felt drawn out, and by the time the action picked up, I was already losing interest.
Overall, while Strage Darling had the potential for something gripping, the predictable twist and the pacing issues really detracted from my experience. I can see why some might enjoy it, but for me, it just didn't hit the mark.
I am against all the highly overated, agressively marketed as "new masterpiece" movies because almost ninety nine point ninety nine of them turn out to be big dissapointments.
I started watching Strange Darling with indifference in an empty gritty movie theater all by myself. It has a non linear editing style with a heavy synthetized bass soundtrack accompanying the shaky visuals. After the first chapter's dull horror, I realized this movie is different because of its non linear editing so this mystery kept me going. If not, I wanted to leave the theater because of messy indie movie scenes that I have watched maybe ten thousand times.
Main characters were greatly portrayed and shaky cinematography turned into a neonish drug fueled nightmare when the movie's twist was served. Was it good enough? It obviously was that this low budget indie found its way in various movie theaters all around the world... But is it a horror masterpiece? Absolutely not. It is another non linear film with a twist that you porobably seen in every Shayamalan movies since 2000s.
6/10 for its acting and non linear editing idea of producers.
I started watching Strange Darling with indifference in an empty gritty movie theater all by myself. It has a non linear editing style with a heavy synthetized bass soundtrack accompanying the shaky visuals. After the first chapter's dull horror, I realized this movie is different because of its non linear editing so this mystery kept me going. If not, I wanted to leave the theater because of messy indie movie scenes that I have watched maybe ten thousand times.
Main characters were greatly portrayed and shaky cinematography turned into a neonish drug fueled nightmare when the movie's twist was served. Was it good enough? It obviously was that this low budget indie found its way in various movie theaters all around the world... But is it a horror masterpiece? Absolutely not. It is another non linear film with a twist that you porobably seen in every Shayamalan movies since 2000s.
6/10 for its acting and non linear editing idea of producers.
Although it is a thrilling film in parts, somewhat sagging, it was woefully let down by the incredible and bizarre stupidity of the characters.
If everyone was rational the film would have ended in 10 minutes, but no absurdity had to get a look in.
I loved the non linear story telling. Your mind is taken through a tense drama of cat and mouse, and then back and forth with different chapters, filling in more detail as you build a picture of whole drama.
But, a big but, and this is why everyone complains the golden age of cinema is well and truly over. To make the story work the film needed a tonne of stupidity and suspension of disbelief. This lets the film down badly to the extent you leave the cinema thinking it was all rubbish.
I think the film will end up at 6.7 (it started off at 8 and at the time of writing it had fallen to 7.1). Another wannabe-clever film, soon to be forgotten.
If everyone was rational the film would have ended in 10 minutes, but no absurdity had to get a look in.
I loved the non linear story telling. Your mind is taken through a tense drama of cat and mouse, and then back and forth with different chapters, filling in more detail as you build a picture of whole drama.
But, a big but, and this is why everyone complains the golden age of cinema is well and truly over. To make the story work the film needed a tonne of stupidity and suspension of disbelief. This lets the film down badly to the extent you leave the cinema thinking it was all rubbish.
I think the film will end up at 6.7 (it started off at 8 and at the time of writing it had fallen to 7.1). Another wannabe-clever film, soon to be forgotten.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPrimarily known for his acting roles, this film marks Giovanni Ribisi's debut as a feature film cinematographer.
- GaffesDespite hiding in an unplugged freezer and it being open for some time afterwards, the frost is still visible on the lid during the house's final scenes.
- Crédits fousThere's an audio clip at the end of the credits.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: Strange Darling (2024)
- Bandes originalesLove Hurts
Written by Boudleaux Bryant
Vocals by Z Berg and Keith Carradine
Produced by Joe Keefe (as Joseph Keefe) and Z Berg
All arrangement and instrumentation by Joe Keefe (as Joseph Keefe)
Engineered by Joe Keefe (as Joseph Keefe) and Will McLellan
Mixed by Joseph Lorge at Sound City
Mastered by Patricia Sullivan at Bernie Grundman
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Strange Darling?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 4 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 083 595 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 142 928 $US
- 25 août 2024
- Montant brut mondial
- 4 853 595 $US
- Durée1 heure 37 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant