Cette émission révèle les mécanismes internes du système financier britannique basé sur la dette et l'impact désastreux des pannes bancaires sur les gens ordinaires.Cette émission révèle les mécanismes internes du système financier britannique basé sur la dette et l'impact désastreux des pannes bancaires sur les gens ordinaires.Cette émission révèle les mécanismes internes du système financier britannique basé sur la dette et l'impact désastreux des pannes bancaires sur les gens ordinaires.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
Ben Bernanke
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Paul Moore
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Alessio Rastani
- Self
- (images d'archives)
Avis à la une
I consider myself to be a relative Intelligent person, but had a truly hard time understanding all of the ins and out of this documentary. While the topic is definitely important and interesting, the makers fail at creating a documentary that average people can understand.
Part of this has to do with the lack of a clear story line. You feel that all of the contributing interviewees have important information, but the total of chunks of information do not lead to a whole that is clear understandable and mor than the sum of its parts.
What also does not help are:
+ The very monotone comment that is unable to draw you into the subject matter.
+ The at times poorly communicating infographics.
+ The seemingly random scenes from black and white moves that bear no clear relation to the topic
The topic is relevant and interesting, but will never reach a really large audience simply because no one seems to have ever really thought about the best way to inform a large audience in a way that they can understand. This one is basically and foremost only for those with a university degree in economics, and therefore by definition for the elite that has no interest in changing things for the better of all of us. A missed opportunity and such a shame.
Looking forward to a more accessible documentary on the topic.
Part of this has to do with the lack of a clear story line. You feel that all of the contributing interviewees have important information, but the total of chunks of information do not lead to a whole that is clear understandable and mor than the sum of its parts.
What also does not help are:
+ The very monotone comment that is unable to draw you into the subject matter.
+ The at times poorly communicating infographics.
+ The seemingly random scenes from black and white moves that bear no clear relation to the topic
The topic is relevant and interesting, but will never reach a really large audience simply because no one seems to have ever really thought about the best way to inform a large audience in a way that they can understand. This one is basically and foremost only for those with a university degree in economics, and therefore by definition for the elite that has no interest in changing things for the better of all of us. A missed opportunity and such a shame.
Looking forward to a more accessible documentary on the topic.
This is a very informative and powerful flick about the nature of our monetary system and how it came to be. It explains that most money is created basically out of thin air and that money is debt. Most people think that banks lend money out of deposits but in fact every time a bank lends money to you it creates that money out of nothing and creates your debt to them at the same time. Similarly, Government spending isn't funded by tax receipts, it occurs electronically and taxes just exist to reduce inflation. This film explains that austerity is a failed policy and criticises asset speculation such as on property and during the tulip fever and it does a good job doing so. One way in which it is a bit lacking though is suggestions of credible solutions - it suggests a tax on currency speculation and says that we should aim for a system where various national currencies are based of a 'basket' of different assets or based on energy consumption in kWh rather than being entirely fiat, iow based on nothing. It should really be more explicit in advocating redistributive taxes and nationalisations such as for the Bank of England and a 'quantitative easing for the people', by which I mean money should be created out of thin air and spent on, not lent to, poor individual and SMEs and more generally spent in potentially productive sectors of the economy like manufacturing, education and healthcare rather than parasitic sectors like banking (and the FIRE sector more generally).
10debochel
"The issue of monetary reform has historically been a very sensitive issue, because of the incredible power, wealth and privileges it bestows. In an age where analytical thought and a scientific approach are held in such high esteem, there is no justifiable argument for keeping the mechanisms and implications of the monetary process such a taboo subject.
As democratic citizens we have the right to demand a monetary system which is both stable and beneficial to society..."
Learn how the global financial institutions are just like terrorists, holding the public hostage with threats of economic collapse - how they're bailed out at the expense of the infrastructures we need to live as we're told that they are simply too big to fail.
This film describes how the banks can fail, and we can all have the financial security we need to confidently take out loans, buy houses and live freer, happier lives, neither as slaves to the banks or restrained by the fear of losing everything.
As democratic citizens we have the right to demand a monetary system which is both stable and beneficial to society..."
Learn how the global financial institutions are just like terrorists, holding the public hostage with threats of economic collapse - how they're bailed out at the expense of the infrastructures we need to live as we're told that they are simply too big to fail.
This film describes how the banks can fail, and we can all have the financial security we need to confidently take out loans, buy houses and live freer, happier lives, neither as slaves to the banks or restrained by the fear of losing everything.
The documentary focuses on money, and how it's made, and the economic and social repurcussions of the process and how banks are exploiting this process for profit.
In fact, it seems the writers and even the people interviewed during this documentary have really no idea of how finance and the economy works... at all. Clearly the directors showed only one side of the story, so it is not without bias that they are getting their point across and luring viewers with the idea that it is all an evil and corrupt system. I'm not questioning whether or not the system is corrupt, or outdated in policies and processes, but the fact of the matter is that the information given in this documentary is incorrect about the money system.
Viewers, be advised to do your own research before considering this the de facto exposé of the money system.
In fact, it seems the writers and even the people interviewed during this documentary have really no idea of how finance and the economy works... at all. Clearly the directors showed only one side of the story, so it is not without bias that they are getting their point across and luring viewers with the idea that it is all an evil and corrupt system. I'm not questioning whether or not the system is corrupt, or outdated in policies and processes, but the fact of the matter is that the information given in this documentary is incorrect about the money system.
Viewers, be advised to do your own research before considering this the de facto exposé of the money system.
We need the ALL the profits from the banking system to reduce our housing costs, re-fund the NHS and provide free education and good pensions.
And while we are at it we could use some of the £trillions per year to stimulate and re-establish, using grants like in the 1980's, the SME sector.
To do this is not socialism. It is not any "ism".
This documentary shows how £trillions per are stolen from us.
An important question is where the £trillions go? Where does all that staggeringly vast sum go every year.
What is the stolen cash doing, while our society suffers hardship, disease, low pensions and tuition fees?
And while we are at it we could use some of the £trillions per year to stimulate and re-establish, using grants like in the 1980's, the SME sector.
To do this is not socialism. It is not any "ism".
This documentary shows how £trillions per are stolen from us.
An important question is where the £trillions go? Where does all that staggeringly vast sum go every year.
What is the stolen cash doing, while our society suffers hardship, disease, low pensions and tuition fees?
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is 97% Owned?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 800 £GB (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 44min(104 min)
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant