Challengers
- 2024
- Tous publics
- 2h 11min
Suit trois joueurs qui se sont connus lorsqu'ils étaient adolescents, alors qu'ils participent à un tournoi de tennis pour devenir le célèbre vainqueur du grand chelem, et qu'ils ravivent de... Tout lireSuit trois joueurs qui se sont connus lorsqu'ils étaient adolescents, alors qu'ils participent à un tournoi de tennis pour devenir le célèbre vainqueur du grand chelem, et qu'ils ravivent de vieilles rivalités sur le court et en dehors.Suit trois joueurs qui se sont connus lorsqu'ils étaient adolescents, alors qu'ils participent à un tournoi de tennis pour devenir le célèbre vainqueur du grand chelem, et qu'ils ravivent de vieilles rivalités sur le court et en dehors.
- Récompenses
- 74 victoires et 151 nominations au total
- Art's Security Guard
- (as a different name)
- Lily
- (as AJ Lister)
Résumé
Avis à la une
Second, there were excessive timeline jumps. It is often a useful story-telling device, but here it was excessive and distracting - so much so that when they did another timeline jump there was a consensus "groan." Making matters worse, is that there were time jumps as long as 13 years. However, Zendaya --- bless her heart --- as much as they tried to "age" her and "de-age" her through hair and make-up, she never looked, to me, older than about 17 years old regardless of the time era.
Third, while I credit Zendaya for tackling such a meaty role, and as much as I otherwise adore her, she just simply seemed to young to be so "weathered" and "jaded" and "cynical" and "ruthless" and "calculating" as she was. Further, I really don't remember her smiling once throughout the movie. And as I have read in other reviews, she seemed to have a resting "scowl" throughout the movie - ironically very much similar to the scowl she had throughout both Dune 1 and 2.
And lastly, by the end of the movie, none of the three characters were likeable, and, perhaps, oddly, sadly, Zendaya was, to me, the least likeable. And from a film character study point of view, the viewer is never given a reason or backstory for this.
With all these distractions in mind, I was so eager for the movie to end that I lost all investment whatsoever in who won or lost in the story's big moment.
The acting was decent. Felt like each character was built upon chemistry and realism. It kept me entertained for the most part.
The times jumps at the beginning worked and created suspense. Leaving the viewer unsure of what the history our 3 characters share however, the time jumps became a bit too rapid and i personally found it harder to keep up with where we are in the story. I feel like they could've left out a few scenes to make the story flow smoother.
The soundtrack was interesting. Not sure if it suited the mood of the film. But my biggest gripe is the ridiculously slowed down ending. Not sure what the director was thinking with that one.
The conclusion felt like it was going on for 1 hour and i felt it a little cheesy with the last scene of the film.
Overall I see a lot of influence from the film "Match Point" starring Scarlet Johansson. In my opinion that film was far more successful in what "challengers" was attempting.
Overall, bit hit and miss. Some decent moments but nothing to get you excited about or talk about after.
Idk if this was the straightest gay movie or the gayest straight movie.
- The thing that stopped this film from feeling incredibly boring was the way it played with time.
- Took 30 minutes to slow down and breathe. But if it didb't, I would've given it half a star less.
- Bad acting in trailers, far from the case in the actual film. Trailers didn't sell me but this was a good movie. Wouldn't go back to it though.
- The trailers spoiled the midpoint.
- I think Tashi should've agreed to train Patrick as a way of tricking him to lose. I also thought the guys were the real ones playing Tashi. I was waiting for a flashback scene where the they plan the whole thing. That might've been generic but I also wasn't expecting a "hug and walk off into the sunset" type of ending.
I had trouble following the timelines of certain scenes and felt confused throughout. Also, the movie basically has only three characters that have any role of significance which I felt was odd. Perhaps the umpire would be considered the fourth character that you see and he has a very small part.
I thought Zendaya was brilliant, but I didn't particularly like her character or the two competitors. There was nobody that you wanted to root for. For a tennis movie, rather go for Wimbledon than this one unfortunately.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesPatrick taking a bite of the churro and letting Art take one was unscripted. Josh O'Connor was starving and it was the first time he ever had churros.
- GaffesAfter Patrick loses the second set in his final round match against Art and smashes his racket, the chair umpire declares a code violation point penalty; however, it should have been a game penalty, as Patrick had already received a point penalty earlier in the match (the scoreboard at the bottom accurately reflects the correct score).
- Citations
Tashi Donaldson: [after Patrick notices her engagement ring] It was his grandmother's.
Patrick Zweig: How is she?
Tashi Donaldson: She died. Stroke.
- Crédits fousOn the United States release of the film, the MGM logo appears after the brief opening prologue, and the roar of studio mascot, Leo the Lion, is silenced.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 7PM Project: Épisode datant du 26 mars 2024 (2024)
- Bandes originalesSound the Trumpet
Written by Henry Purcell
Performed by The Toronto Children's Chorus
Courtesy of Marquis Classics
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Challengers?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 55 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 50 119 408 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 15 011 061 $US
- 28 avr. 2024
- Montant brut mondial
- 96 119 408 $US
- Durée2 heures 11 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1