NOTE IMDb
6,9/10
2,8 k
MA NOTE
Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAn examination of the research by forensic psychiatrist Dorothy Otnow Lewis who investigated the psychology of murderers.An examination of the research by forensic psychiatrist Dorothy Otnow Lewis who investigated the psychology of murderers.An examination of the research by forensic psychiatrist Dorothy Otnow Lewis who investigated the psychology of murderers.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Dorothy Otnow Lewis
- Self - Clinical Psychiatrist
- (as Dorothy Lewis)
Catherine Yeager
- Self - Clinical Psychologist
- (as Dr. Catherine Yeager)
Park Dietz
- Self - Forensic Psychiatrist
- (as Dr. Park Dietz)
Tom Brokaw
- Self - Host, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw
- (images d'archives)
Bill Clinton
- Self - Governor of Arkansas
- (images d'archives)
Thomas Coccuzzi
- Self - Defense Attorney for Arthur Shawcross
- (images d'archives)
Walt Disney
- Self - Animator
- (images d'archives)
- …
William Elledge
- Self - Convicted Murderer
- (images d'archives)
Henry Ford
- Self - Industrialist & Antisemite
- (images d'archives)
Joseph Paul Franklin
- Self - Convicted Murderer & Neo-Nazi Terrorist
- (images d'archives)
Charles Gibson
- Self - ABC News Anchor
- (images d'archives)
Joseph Goebbels
- Self - Reich Minister of Propaganda, 1933 - 1945
- (images d'archives)
Hermann Göring
- Self - President of the Reichstag, 1932 - 1945
- (images d'archives)
Adolf Hitler
- Self - Führer and Chancellor of Germany
- (images d'archives)
Joseph P. Kennedy
- Self - Kennedy Family Patriarch & Antisemite
- (images d'archives)
Avis à la une
Dr. Lewis likely has interviewed more serial killers than anyone else on the planet, but it is doubtful whether all that talk has produced any useful research on the subject. Her seeming determination to discover multiple personalities in every serial killer she interviews damages her credibility and exposes her stunning gullibility.
This documentary provided little insight into the study of the disassociative mind but rather highlighted Dr. Lewis's view of her most spectacular interactions with famous murderers. The documentary managed to turn a fascinating subject into a 😴.
I think most reasonably intelligent people realize that some of the most sadistic, unempathetic, sociopathic criminals in our midst come from awful backgrounds, dysfunctional families, abuse, and trauma. The credibility of this program's assertions quickly ends there.
The program proceeds to document two academic psychotherapists being led around by the nose by some of the most manipulative personalities known, psychopathic sexual sadists and murderers. Murders who repeatedly and conveniently evidence, for the first time, multiple personality disorders, when interviewed by these two. Performances which are encouraged and almost welcomed with glee. If you want to watch something that will strip you of any faith you might have in defense "experts," watch this. This is the definition of confirmation bias in quasi-science.
The program proceeds to document two academic psychotherapists being led around by the nose by some of the most manipulative personalities known, psychopathic sexual sadists and murderers. Murders who repeatedly and conveniently evidence, for the first time, multiple personality disorders, when interviewed by these two. Performances which are encouraged and almost welcomed with glee. If you want to watch something that will strip you of any faith you might have in defense "experts," watch this. This is the definition of confirmation bias in quasi-science.
Purely an "anti death penalty" movie based on the notion that ALL murderers are brain damaged or have multiple personality/dissociative identity disorder. A lot of it is just pure BS based in nothing close to real science.
It's easy to start falling down the rabbit hole of whatever your life work is. I think Dorothy bridged some huge gaps in mental health and how that affects some people. Like the film said, killers are made, not born. However, to be in favor of halting death penalty cases so one can be researched (or do the researching) is very wrong. I feel this film focused on the humanity of the killer and ignored the victims. That's fine if you're doing research to understand the mind of a killer, but to want to take on the ethics of capital punishment goes too far. MANY people have really messed up childhoods and anyone reading this has experienced that or knows someone who did. They don't all start killing (and that's addressed in this film). But the death penalty isn't only about ridding humanity of a threat or to even be a deterrent for others. It's about getting justice for the victim(s) and the family(s) of the victim(s). It would be nice if life was free of horrible, terrible things like rape, murder, torture etc. Unfortunately, that's just a part of human nature that will never go away. Doing research and attempting to understand all facets of the human brain is fantastic - the more we know the better. However, the death penalty should be in place in EVERY STATE and used only for the worst of society who's crimes have been proved 100% - there's ZERO chance that a mistake has been made. Society needs that. To know that there is a punishment to fit the crime.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDissociative Identity Disorder, formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder, is a highly controversial diagnosis, with many arguments against it being anything more than an iatrogenic disorder -- in other words, caused by the therapy/therapist itself. Most notable amongst these arguments is that unlike other psychological disorders, DID is not observed outside of treatment with certain select clinicians, all of whom already believe in DID. What has been observed across all clinicians and researchers, however, are examples of confirmation bias, persuasive interview techniques, demand characteristics, and the oftentimes overwhelming urge to please demonstrated by patients in general. In addition, early North American works (DID is an overwhelmingly American disorder, yet another point of contention for the pro/anti-DID debate) which are seen as having started the DID diagnosis trend have been debunked in recent years as primarily fictitious stories, written to sell books. As controversial as the diagnosis of DID is, many feel that there may be some degree of negligence on the part of the producer(s), the director, and the film company as a whole for not employing a disclaimer as well as affording equal time to opposing expert viewpoints.
- ConnexionsReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 777: Mank + The Queen's Gambit (2020)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Crazy, Not Insane?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 59 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 16:9 HD
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Crazy, Not Insane (2020) officially released in India in English?
Répondre