Loose Change: Second Edition
- Vidéo
- 2005
- 1h 22min
Une remise en cause de la version officielle des attentats 11 septembre 2001, une démonstration argumentée que les attaques dont furent victimes les Etats Unis auraient été connues et planif... Tout lireUne remise en cause de la version officielle des attentats 11 septembre 2001, une démonstration argumentée que les attaques dont furent victimes les Etats Unis auraient été connues et planifées par le gouvernement Américain.Une remise en cause de la version officielle des attentats 11 septembre 2001, une démonstration argumentée que les attaques dont furent victimes les Etats Unis auraient été connues et planifées par le gouvernement Américain.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
Avis à la une
That said, the fact is that much of what Loose Change describes probably is crazy conspiracy rubbish. What it offers is merely an alternative explanation that fits the facts - something that the "official account" doesn't seem to do all that well. Even if 99% of the material in Loose Change is utter garbage, what about that remaining 1%? Doesn't that deserve your attention? Alternatively, if you feel 99% of the official account is true, what about that last 1% that just doesn't fit the data? Like all theories (including scientific ones), Loose Change will undoubtedly need to be tweaked or even completely overhauled to fit any new or contradictory information as it comes to light. Why is that such a problem? Does the official account offer that sort of flexibility?
Who knows what really happened on 9/11, but it seems fairly clear that certain parties besides the hijackers knew what was going down.
The claim made by most critics is that the US government has high morals enough not to kill any of its own citizens. Even though many thousands US soldiers died in WW2, 58 000 US troops died in Vietnam, a number of US troops are still dying in Afghanistan and Iraq as we speak.
These are people, human beings, US citizens that dies because of decisions made by the US government. Inevitable you might say, but nothing is inevitable. Ever.
There are endless records where governments deceive their own population in order to mass support behind a war. It has been true in Nazi-Germany, in the U.K., in France during WW2, in Rwanda, Congo, Burma/Myanmar...
Check out Operation Northwoods and make up your own mind. It's on Wikipedia. Check out Operation Ajax, the CIA assisted coup in Chile 1973, the Iran-Contras deal, Nurse Nayirah in Gulf War I, the genocide that didn't take place in former Yugoslavia.
All which directly or indirectly have taken American lives. Do not think that you are spared.
As far as the movie goes, it is poorly referenced, some of the truths told are complete nonsense or exaggerations, but there are still things that DO NOT ADD UP in the official story.
I hope that you will watch this movie and make up your own mind. We learn from history that we have not learned from history. Sometimes the ignorance must stop, even in the greatest democracy of them all, selfrighteous pads on the back or not.
Whether you believe every single word said on it, or you don't at all. You wont get bored, since this a very interesting presentation of another point of view of the events of 9/11. Maybe some very specific facts can be wrong, but that doesn't means this movie is not worth watching. I would recommend this film, since you can watch it for free from different sources through the internet.
I am amazed by number of Reviews rating this movie with 1, that I actually consider the possibility of people being paid to rate it that way. Eg. Look How most of the negative reviews are twice or three times longer than the positive ones...
Watch it with an open mind and question it but if you have already come to a conclusion that this film is a farce then avoid it and God help you.
Le saviez-vous
- Citations
CNN Anchor: [live on 9/11, the Pentagon still burning] ... from my closeup inspection there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual side of the building that's crashed in, and as I said, the only pieces left - that you can see are, are small enough that you can pick'm up in your hand. There are no large tail-sections, wing-sections, - fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.
- ConnexionsFeatured in The 9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction (2006)
Meilleurs choix
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Разменная монета: Второе издание
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 000 $US (estimé)
- Durée
- 1h 22min(82 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1