[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendrier de parutionsTop 250 des filmsFilms les plus regardésRechercher des films par genreSommet du box-officeHoraires et ticketsActualités du cinémaFilms indiens en vedette
    À la télé et en streamingTop 250 des sériesSéries les plus populairesParcourir les séries TV par genreActualités TV
    Que regarderDernières bandes-annoncesProgrammes IMDb OriginalChoix d’IMDbCoup de projecteur sur IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestivalsTous les événements
    Nés aujourd’huiCélébrités les plus populairesActualités des célébrités
    Centre d’aideZone des contributeursSondages
Pour les professionnels du secteur
  • Langue
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Liste de favoris
Se connecter
  • Entièrement prise en charge
  • English (United States)
    Partiellement prise en charge
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Utiliser l'appli
  • Distribution et équipe technique
  • Avis des utilisateurs
  • Anecdotes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Human Nature

  • 2001
  • Tous publics
  • 1h 36min
NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
19 k
MA NOTE
Human Nature (2001)
Trailer
Lire trailer2:13
7 Videos
82 photos
SatireComedyDrama

Une femme est éprise d'un homme amoureux d'une autre femme, et tous trois ont des vues sur un jeune homme qui a grandi dans une famille de singes.Une femme est éprise d'un homme amoureux d'une autre femme, et tous trois ont des vues sur un jeune homme qui a grandi dans une famille de singes.Une femme est éprise d'un homme amoureux d'une autre femme, et tous trois ont des vues sur un jeune homme qui a grandi dans une famille de singes.

  • Réalisation
    • Michel Gondry
  • Scénario
    • Charlie Kaufman
  • Casting principal
    • Tim Robbins
    • Patricia Arquette
    • Rhys Ifans
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
  • NOTE IMDb
    6,4/10
    19 k
    MA NOTE
    • Réalisation
      • Michel Gondry
    • Scénario
      • Charlie Kaufman
    • Casting principal
      • Tim Robbins
      • Patricia Arquette
      • Rhys Ifans
    • 82avis d'utilisateurs
    • 81avis des critiques
    • 56Métascore
  • Voir les informations de production sur IMDbPro
    • Récompenses
      • 2 victoires et 2 nominations au total

    Vidéos7

    Human Nature
    Trailer 2:13
    Human Nature
    Human Nature Scene: Clip1
    Clip 1:07
    Human Nature Scene: Clip1
    Human Nature Scene: Clip1
    Clip 1:07
    Human Nature Scene: Clip1
    Human Nature Scene: Clip3
    Clip 1:29
    Human Nature Scene: Clip3
    Human Nature Scene: Clip2
    Clip 0:47
    Human Nature Scene: Clip2
    Human Nature Scene: Clip6
    Clip 0:39
    Human Nature Scene: Clip6
    Human Nature Scene: Clip5
    Clip 0:44
    Human Nature Scene: Clip5

    Photos82

    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    Voir l'affiche
    + 76
    Voir l'affiche

    Rôles principaux27

    Modifier
    Tim Robbins
    Tim Robbins
    • Dr. Nathan Bronfman
    Patricia Arquette
    Patricia Arquette
    • Lila Jute
    Rhys Ifans
    Rhys Ifans
    • Puff
    Ken Magee
    • Police Detective
    Sy Richardson
    Sy Richardson
    • Police Detective
    David Warshofsky
    David Warshofsky
    • Police Detective
    Hilary Duff
    Hilary Duff
    • Young Lila Jute
    Stanley DeSantis
    Stanley DeSantis
    • Doctor
    • (as Stanley Desantis)
    Peter Dinklage
    Peter Dinklage
    • Frank
    Toby Huss
    Toby Huss
    • Puff's Father
    Bobby Harwell
    • Congressman
    Daryl Anderson
    Daryl Anderson
    • Congressman
    Bobby Pyle
    • Young Puff
    Chase MacKenzie Bebak
    • Young Nathan
    • (as Chase Bebak)
    Mary Kay Place
    Mary Kay Place
    • Nathan's Mother
    Robert Forster
    Robert Forster
    • Nathan's Father
    Rosie Perez
    Rosie Perez
    • Louise
    Miguel Sandoval
    Miguel Sandoval
    • Wendall the Therapist
    • Réalisation
      • Michel Gondry
    • Scénario
      • Charlie Kaufman
    • Toute la distribution et toute l’équipe technique
    • Production, box office et plus encore chez IMDbPro

    Avis des utilisateurs82

    6,419.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avis à la une

    10bcigor

    Oh Come On, this one is great

    I don't know what's happening with the votes on this movie. It IS really great. May be people just get offended by lots of nudity in this picture? Why to bother? It's VERY thought-provoking, extremely smart, funny and in a same way sad. I prefer it over Eternal Sunshine sometimes. Really great story about how hopeless we all are. A bit farce, a bit comedy, and great philosophical meaning. Why don't we live in forests? Why don't we try to be free? Why do we live in this world of steel and plastic? Just think about what questions do Kaufman movie rise.

    Being John Malkovich .. is pretty shallow, not strong work. I still adore it, but it's worst Kaufmans work for me, though it's extremely original.

    Adaptation brings out greatest thoughts about movie-making, about human relations, about creativity and Hollywood, about mainstream and real art. And the funny thing Adaptation even mocks about itself. Great script.

    Eternal Sunshine is mainly about love, destiny and memories. Nothing else there. Though i have to admit it's a perfect script.

    Human Nature is an anti-human, Greenpeace-pro movie... till the very end. It mocks humanity sometimes, but mostly talks about how self-important we are, how ungracious to the nature around us. But the end ... Well, wont write spoilers here.

    This movie is a skeptical answer for all those hopeless romantics out there. And i think it's a great symbiotic relationship. Romance and skepticism.
    10Eli-18

    it's nice to see a movie that raises philosophical questions

    'Human Nature' will inevitably be reviewed in comparison to 'Being John Malkovich', and the comments will be along the lines of 'less coherent', 'not likely to be as commercially successful', etc. But should these be reasons to NOT see this movie? Only if you want to miss the most intelligent movie to come out since BJM. Forget 'A Beautiful Mind', which gives the appearance of intelligence by flaunting pseudo-guru math, but was just another sappy tale of 'the triumph of the human spirit'.

    What makes 'Human Nature' and BJM a cut above the usual cinema drivel, is that they actually attempt to get into some serious philosophical issues. BJM delves into personal identity, while 'Human Nature' digs even deeper into the realm of our underlying... human nature. What makes human nature any better than animal nature? civilization? language? manners? And do these distinctly human features actually make us better, or just different, or different in a bad way... i.e. by making us lead dual lives, tearing our originally united being into inharmonious halves (subjective/objective)? And can we simply unite our duplicitousness by forgetting language, civilization, and manners... by returning to nature? Or, with a philosopher who gets an intensional nod in 'Human Nature', Wittgenstein, are we stuck in language, forever banished from the garden of eden?

    This movie raised all of these questions, and more, for me... which is what I expect out of a good movie: not only does it entertain us, but it invites us to join in the entertaining. By posing these questions, it challenges us to answer them, and to ask our own questions of it... which means that we have to see it again in order for it to continue the dialogue. Now that's what I call interactive movie-going. Philosophy has started some great stuff in history: religion, government, science. So I think that's its not asking too much for movies to engage in philosophical debates and trying to include the audience, rather than thinking of the audience as fodder for the box office.
    7TxCracker

    The question on all of our minds:

    After perusing the other viewers' comments on this site and noting the plethora of pertinent sociological questions that arise from the viewing of this obviously intellectual piece of cinematography, I can't help but notice that the most obvious question of all has not yet been touched upon, therefore, I will ask it now.

    If you were locked in a room with Patricia Arquette and an electric grooming shear, would you shave her body before making love to her?

    Maybe the reason this question has not yet been asked is because the answer is so obvious it pretty much goes without saying. That answer is, of course, no. If you were to buzz-cut Ms. Arquette's body with such a tool, you would, without any doubt, leave a stubble that would be rough and scratchy, causing you so much discomfort during the act of intercourse that the whole experience would inevitably become somewhat unpleasant, relatively speaking.

    Leaving her hairy, on the other hand, would give you the sensation that you were rolling around with a large, fluffy dog...a feeling which could only add a new measure of pleasure to the whole coital experience. This should not be construed as bestiality, being that the "fluffy-dog" sense of pleasure would be separate from the "doing Patricia" feeling of prurient ecstasy, which means the whole scenario could be pulled off guilt-free.

    That would be superb, especially for me, being that I have been totally hot for this particular actress ever since I saw her in True Romance. I would be happy to be in bed with her even if she was a toothless quadruple-amputee covered with hair from her head all the way down to her...uh, never mind.
    7ThurstonHunger

    Just say bonobo...

    I read the IMDB reviews on this two nights ago, and decided not to rent this film. But then as if by coincidence, the next night I noticed it was on cable currently, so I taped it.

    And I'm glad I did.

    It seems some reviewers lament the lack of a message in this, I can appreciate such weighty films, hey I enjoyed the "Whale Rider," but such films often reduce down simply to hackneyed sententia. I'm kinda afraid life does as well...but this ain't the forum for that chat.

    Charlie Kaufmann seems to specialize in *mixed* message films. I enjoy them as I enjoy a puzzle. They are thought-provoking both in theme and in details (don't know about you, but I had to look up Franz Kline...)

    Other reviewers lament the onanism going on (or should that be down). To me, "Adaptation" was a whole lot more masturbatory, this has an easier-to-follow plot. The humor rises more quickly to the surface...and yes I did chuckle at times.

    No one so far has voiced concern over this being a film that reflects back from the start. It is done deftly; although I know some people dislike that as a device.

    There are several nice film tricks. A circular beginning/ending, Robbins clearly being in a closed afterworld, and nods to other films...Bambi, Tarzan, Frankenstein, Sophie's Choice... ;> No, I'm forgetting another real one. I'm not that familiar with the director's MTV exploits, but I'll rent that collection sooner or later.

    No one here yet has mentioned Young Frankenstein (which I see as more of a prototype than Pygmalion...or even Oedipus Rex.) But there are some serious questions being posed. Less these days than in the 70's do we get pitched an idyllic ideal; one wherein if man were stripped of his modern trappings, social strictures, political oppression and other garb, would we find a purer being? Isn't that also an element of Marx/Hegelism?

    Kaufmann weaves a new sort of unibrow...uniting the high and the low.

    There are other more universal moments here. Arquette struggling not to care what others think about her. Robbins trying to chose between the sweet girlfriend and the saucy seductress, between his heart and his...

    Ahem, still there's much more here than what I fear is found in "Me and Him." Libido is a prime mover...whether subjugated or conjugal.

    I'm having a hard time wrapping this up...is it a film that states that human nature is deceitful (all of four main characters are in at least one charade)?

    Again, I'm glad I rented it. I've got to get better at cross-referencing other reviewers when reading posts here. I think Kaufmann is a very gifted, and very conflicted guy.

    7/10
    anthonymigliori

    Not as bad as some people say it is. It's actually pretty good.

    "Human Nature" is just one example of what happens when you combine a script written by Charlie Kaufman, the directorial talents of Michel Gondry, and a stellar cast featuring Tim Robbins, Patricia Arquette, and Rhys Ifans.

    The movie may not be up to par with Kaufman's other works such as "Being John Malkovich" and "Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind," but it does great at utilizing the usual elements that make a great Kaufman script: Eccentricity, great dialogue, and sometimes dark humor.

    This film also happens to be director Michel Gondry's first directorial effort. While the film does lack some of the trademarks that Gondry would use in the other films of his career, (specifically his manipulation of the mise en scene) this film is, after all, his first directorial effort. Sometimes directors don't immediately find out what their main style is on their debut films.

    Then you have the performances of the cast. Tim Robbins and Patricia Arquette shine in their respectful places as the male and female leads, but I believe Rhys Ifans deserves a bit more love. His performance as Puff is one that I feel is wildly underrated.

    Overall, "Human Nature" is worth a go, especially if you like anything with Charlie Kaufman or Tim Robbins or Patricia Arquette written on it.

    Vous aimerez aussi

    Confessions d'un homme dangereux
    7,0
    Confessions d'un homme dangereux
    Anomalisa
    7,2
    Anomalisa
    La science des rêves
    7,2
    La science des rêves
    Synecdoche, New York
    7,5
    Synecdoche, New York
    Adaptation.
    7,7
    Adaptation.
    Je veux juste en finir
    6,5
    Je veux juste en finir
    Conversation animée avec Noam Chomsky
    7,1
    Conversation animée avec Noam Chomsky
    Soyez sympas, rembobinez
    6,4
    Soyez sympas, rembobinez
    How and Why
    6,3
    How and Why
    L'Écume des jours
    6,5
    L'Écume des jours
    Dans la peau de John Malkovich
    7,7
    Dans la peau de John Malkovich
    Microbe et gasoil
    6,7
    Microbe et gasoil

    Histoire

    Modifier

    Le saviez-vous

    Modifier
    • Anecdotes
      Many of the scenes in the forest are allusions to or recreations of scenes in the Björk music video "Human Behavior", also directed by Michel Gondry.
    • Gaffes
      Puff was raised by a madman who never taught him basic language skills or anything about human life. So how does he know the story of being stolen from his mother's apartment?
    • Citations

      Nathan Bronfman: What is love anyway? From my new vantage point, I realize that love is nothing more than a messy conglomeration of need, desperation, fear of death and insecurity about penis size.

    • Connexions
      Featured in Una Especie de Cine-Teatro Novelesco (2006)
    • Bandes originales
      Hair Everywhere
      (2001)

      Music and Orchestrations by Jean-Michel Bernard

      Lyrics by Charlie Kaufman

      Performed by Patricia Arquette

    Meilleurs choix

    Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
    Se connecter

    FAQ19

    • How long is Human Nature?Alimenté par Alexa

    Détails

    Modifier
    • Date de sortie
      • 12 septembre 2001 (France)
    • Pays d’origine
      • France
      • États-Unis
    • Langues
      • Anglais
      • Français
    • Aussi connu sous le nom de
      • Звіряча натура
    • Lieux de tournage
      • Californie, États-Unis
    • Sociétés de production
      • Fine Line Features
      • StudioCanal
      • Good Machine
    • Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro

    Box-office

    Modifier
    • Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 705 308 $US
    • Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
      • 297 340 $US
      • 14 avr. 2002
    • Montant brut mondial
      • 1 574 660 $US
    Voir les infos détaillées du box-office sur IMDbPro

    Spécifications techniques

    Modifier
    • Durée
      1 heure 36 minutes
    • Couleur
      • Color
    • Mixage
      • Dolby Digital
    • Rapport de forme
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribuer à cette page

    Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
    Human Nature (2001)
    Lacune principale
    By what name was Human Nature (2001) officially released in India in English?
    Répondre
    • Voir plus de lacunes
    • En savoir plus sur la contribution
    Modifier la page

    Découvrir

    Récemment consultés

    Activez les cookies du navigateur pour utiliser cette fonctionnalité. En savoir plus
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Identifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressourcesIdentifiez-vous pour accéder à davantage de ressources
    Suivez IMDb sur les réseaux sociaux
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    Pour Android et iOS
    Obtenir l'application IMDb
    • Aide
    • Index du site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licence de données IMDb
    • Salle de presse
    • Annonces
    • Emplois
    • Conditions d'utilisation
    • Politique de confidentialité
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, une société Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.