NOTE IMDb
4,9/10
3,3 k
MA NOTE
Un homme réalise que ses parents ont été l'objet d'expérience atomiques dans le passé, ce qui implique qu'il possède certains pouvoirs destructeurs.Un homme réalise que ses parents ont été l'objet d'expérience atomiques dans le passé, ce qui implique qu'il possède certains pouvoirs destructeurs.Un homme réalise que ses parents ont été l'objet d'expérience atomiques dans le passé, ce qui implique qu'il possède certains pouvoirs destructeurs.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Avis à la une
Eccentric but interesting thriller. Brad Dourif puts a lot into his portrayal of the lead character, a school teacher who discovers he can start fires, and the performance is one of the main things thats lifts the film out of the rut.
With its evocation of a strange little town dominated a large nuclear plant the film recalled for me "Strange Behavior" (1981) (AKA "Dead Kids"). The films show an odd mix of architecture, clothing fashion and interior decoration from different eras that makes placing and dating the film difficult. Overall its look and generally offbeat characters gives the film an effective unreal sort of quality. Also similar to "Strange Behavior" is the murky, complex, slowly unfolding story and the sinister scientist who is controlling everything. Also Dey Young is a cast member of both films, sadly underused here.
With its evocation of a strange little town dominated a large nuclear plant the film recalled for me "Strange Behavior" (1981) (AKA "Dead Kids"). The films show an odd mix of architecture, clothing fashion and interior decoration from different eras that makes placing and dating the film difficult. Overall its look and generally offbeat characters gives the film an effective unreal sort of quality. Also similar to "Strange Behavior" is the murky, complex, slowly unfolding story and the sinister scientist who is controlling everything. Also Dey Young is a cast member of both films, sadly underused here.
Nevada desert, 1955. Peggy and Brian Bell, are being experimented on by the US Army to test the effects of exposure to atomic energy whilst testing a nuclear bomb. The test seems to go well, and the Bells are located in a picturesque suburbia. However, after giving birth to their son, the couple suddenly spontaneously combusted, a clear effect of the nuclear fallout. The baby boy survives them, and grows up to be Sam (Brad Dourif).
So we flash forward to the present day, where Sam's freakish ability to combust becomes increasingly dangerous to both himself and others around him. In one scene (with a cameo from John Landis), Sam has called into a radio psychic DJ - who has now gone off the air - and gets through to the Landis' radio technician who refuses to pass him onto the DJ (Dr Persons - played by Joe Mays). This increases Sam's anger (which as we have seen previously, makes Sam burnier), and he projects fire through the phone (in a pseudo-telekinetic flash), which results in fire streaming from the knee-caps of poor Landis. Sam's main goal is to find out about his parents and to determine why these phenomena keep occurring.
Tobe Hooper has not had it easy since the release of exceptionally brilliant debut The Texas Chain-Saw Massacre (1974). All of his subsequent films have either fallen foul of studio intervention (Death Trap (1977), The Funhouse (1981)), executive producer Steven Spielberg's ultimate overbearing on-set presence (Poltergeist (1982), or just poorly conceived ideas (Lifeforce (1985), Invaders from Mars (1986) and Texas Chain-Saw Massacre 2 (1986). He seems only in the latter part of the '80's produce Stephen King-like projects, either directly adapting a King novel (Salem's Lot (1979 -TV mini-series), or lifting pseudo-King story devices, much like Spontaneous Combustion. The use of fire as a telekinetic ability had been previously 'explored' in Kings Firestarter.
This is not a great film. The production values are akin to the TV movies/series' that were being broadcast at the time. this was seen throughout the genre in the early years of the decade. This period is almost a vacuum of popular visual culture, with the exception of one horror, the TV series Twin Peaks (1990-1991). The camera movements and compositions are standard television production. Aside from the lack of visual flare, there is one element that never really fails to please. That is of course Brad Dourif. I find everything that Dourif is in to be thoroughly fun to watch. Even, as in this performance, when he is wildly over-the-top. His eyes intense, and his vociferousness projected directly into you brain, sharp and direct. No one does sweaty anger like Dourif does. So, in conclusion. S**t film, but it is totally be forgiven cause Brad Dourif is in it.
www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
So we flash forward to the present day, where Sam's freakish ability to combust becomes increasingly dangerous to both himself and others around him. In one scene (with a cameo from John Landis), Sam has called into a radio psychic DJ - who has now gone off the air - and gets through to the Landis' radio technician who refuses to pass him onto the DJ (Dr Persons - played by Joe Mays). This increases Sam's anger (which as we have seen previously, makes Sam burnier), and he projects fire through the phone (in a pseudo-telekinetic flash), which results in fire streaming from the knee-caps of poor Landis. Sam's main goal is to find out about his parents and to determine why these phenomena keep occurring.
Tobe Hooper has not had it easy since the release of exceptionally brilliant debut The Texas Chain-Saw Massacre (1974). All of his subsequent films have either fallen foul of studio intervention (Death Trap (1977), The Funhouse (1981)), executive producer Steven Spielberg's ultimate overbearing on-set presence (Poltergeist (1982), or just poorly conceived ideas (Lifeforce (1985), Invaders from Mars (1986) and Texas Chain-Saw Massacre 2 (1986). He seems only in the latter part of the '80's produce Stephen King-like projects, either directly adapting a King novel (Salem's Lot (1979 -TV mini-series), or lifting pseudo-King story devices, much like Spontaneous Combustion. The use of fire as a telekinetic ability had been previously 'explored' in Kings Firestarter.
This is not a great film. The production values are akin to the TV movies/series' that were being broadcast at the time. this was seen throughout the genre in the early years of the decade. This period is almost a vacuum of popular visual culture, with the exception of one horror, the TV series Twin Peaks (1990-1991). The camera movements and compositions are standard television production. Aside from the lack of visual flare, there is one element that never really fails to please. That is of course Brad Dourif. I find everything that Dourif is in to be thoroughly fun to watch. Even, as in this performance, when he is wildly over-the-top. His eyes intense, and his vociferousness projected directly into you brain, sharp and direct. No one does sweaty anger like Dourif does. So, in conclusion. S**t film, but it is totally be forgiven cause Brad Dourif is in it.
www.the-wrath-of-blog.blogspot.com
The picture based allegedly in a reality, concerns about a young man(Brad Dourif) aware his parents(Stacy Edwards and Brian Bremer)had been used in a nuclear experiment. Them, he inherits the power to inflict the title phenomenon on other people . He's recently separated his spouse(Blain)and again appear his ability -called pyrokinesis, though sometimes is incontrollable- to ignite objects and people around him. Then, blazing deaths occur, the result of another evil government experiment.
This is a suspenseful and frightening movie , though regularly paced. The movie contains some flaws and sometimes is silly and ludicrous, furthermore wasting the acting talent. Casting is quite well, Brad Dourif is nice, as usual, in one of his habitual roles as hapless. Magnificent plethora secondaries as Melinda Dillon, John Cypher , William Prince and Dale Dye. Special appearance of Hollywood directors as John Landis and Andre De Toth . The film is in the ink of¨ Firestarter¨(directed by Mark L Lester with Drew Barrymore and George C Scott) and ¨Firestarter 2¨(Robert Iscove with Marguerite Moreau and Malcolm McDowell). The motion picture is regularly directed by Tobe Hooper, who previously acquired success with ¨Texas chainsaw massacre, Salem's Lot,Funhouse,Invaders from Mars and Poltergeist¨, however with 'Spontaneous Combustion' got a failure. Rating : Mediocre though some moments is entertaining.
This is a suspenseful and frightening movie , though regularly paced. The movie contains some flaws and sometimes is silly and ludicrous, furthermore wasting the acting talent. Casting is quite well, Brad Dourif is nice, as usual, in one of his habitual roles as hapless. Magnificent plethora secondaries as Melinda Dillon, John Cypher , William Prince and Dale Dye. Special appearance of Hollywood directors as John Landis and Andre De Toth . The film is in the ink of¨ Firestarter¨(directed by Mark L Lester with Drew Barrymore and George C Scott) and ¨Firestarter 2¨(Robert Iscove with Marguerite Moreau and Malcolm McDowell). The motion picture is regularly directed by Tobe Hooper, who previously acquired success with ¨Texas chainsaw massacre, Salem's Lot,Funhouse,Invaders from Mars and Poltergeist¨, however with 'Spontaneous Combustion' got a failure. Rating : Mediocre though some moments is entertaining.
With fleetingly fare exception, the best computer-generated imagery that anyone could ever offer will age rapidly, and will look worse the more we see of it. Older post-production visuals seen in science fiction, fantasy, and horror fare of the 70s, 80s, and 90s continues to hold up superbly not despite but precisely because it's less than seamless, and no one is pretending otherwise. The most modest practical effects and tangible creations will always, always be preferred over digital falsehood, and gratifyingly, celebrated director Tobe Hooper fills 'Spontaneous combustion' with the physical. Sure, we get touches of those additions made in post - some tasteful embellishments, and the electricity that also plays a part here is much harder to safely represent on-screen using props and effects on-set - but the bulk of the sights to greet us are the delightful result of chemical processes executed in real life and captured on film. From fire and explosions, to blood and special makeup, to set pieces and environmental effects, the visuals in these ninety-seven minutes are very predominantly real and dangerous, achieved through stunts and expertise, and I could hardly be happier with how good they all look.
This flick is surely worth watching for those effects alone, and that it happens to also star a young Brad Dourif is a swell bonus. The story of pyrokinesis, of a man learning of his unique capabilities and his family history, and of the impact all this has on himself and those around him, is rich with potential for cinematic storytelling. The specifics of what Hooper put together with co-writer Howard Goldberg, well, those are more variable. All the ideas are there, and they are worthy: a tableau of experimentation, secrets, conspiracy, and burgeoning, incomprehensible power. It comes across, however, that Hooper and Goldberg had difficulty shaping these notions into a cogent, cohesive form, as the plot and its development feel clunky and forced the more that it delves into those behind the scenes who have molded or monitored the protagonist's life. Some odds and ends are nearly incoherent as they are woven in. That difficulty is further echoed in Hooper's direction, and David Kern's sequencing, leading to some scenes of acting, character interactions, and/or plot development that are either limp or overwrought, or otherwise unconvincing, at least as often as all the pieces fit and work together. 'Spontaneous combustion' is enjoyable, but it is unmistakably troubled.
Still, while the conjuration and execution are distinctly flawed - affecting even Dourif's performance, let alone those of his co-stars - the story is compelling and engaging, and in fits and starts the acting is quite fine. In my mind there's no questioning that the feature is at its best in all ways where it is directly dealing with the effects and the protagonist's abilities, but in other regards, too, this is splendidly well made, including excellent, detailed, often creative production design and art direction. Composer extraordinaire Graeme Revell provides a terrific, moody score that lends to the increasingly dark mood, lending in the last act especially to stunning, grim fancifulness as Hooper's imagination is allowed to run amok without worrying so much about the nuts and bolts. And that's rather the key, as the vision is simply grand, and it's the framework that's devised to support that vision that is the problem. When all is said and done the movie is a good time, and it is worth watching on its own merits. It's just unfortunate that the grisly whimsy is restrained, and diminished, as Hooper and Goldberg struggled to weave it into a screenplay that's far less vibrant. Be well aware of these issues, and that might be the best way to get the most out of 'Spontaneous combustion.'
This flick is surely worth watching for those effects alone, and that it happens to also star a young Brad Dourif is a swell bonus. The story of pyrokinesis, of a man learning of his unique capabilities and his family history, and of the impact all this has on himself and those around him, is rich with potential for cinematic storytelling. The specifics of what Hooper put together with co-writer Howard Goldberg, well, those are more variable. All the ideas are there, and they are worthy: a tableau of experimentation, secrets, conspiracy, and burgeoning, incomprehensible power. It comes across, however, that Hooper and Goldberg had difficulty shaping these notions into a cogent, cohesive form, as the plot and its development feel clunky and forced the more that it delves into those behind the scenes who have molded or monitored the protagonist's life. Some odds and ends are nearly incoherent as they are woven in. That difficulty is further echoed in Hooper's direction, and David Kern's sequencing, leading to some scenes of acting, character interactions, and/or plot development that are either limp or overwrought, or otherwise unconvincing, at least as often as all the pieces fit and work together. 'Spontaneous combustion' is enjoyable, but it is unmistakably troubled.
Still, while the conjuration and execution are distinctly flawed - affecting even Dourif's performance, let alone those of his co-stars - the story is compelling and engaging, and in fits and starts the acting is quite fine. In my mind there's no questioning that the feature is at its best in all ways where it is directly dealing with the effects and the protagonist's abilities, but in other regards, too, this is splendidly well made, including excellent, detailed, often creative production design and art direction. Composer extraordinaire Graeme Revell provides a terrific, moody score that lends to the increasingly dark mood, lending in the last act especially to stunning, grim fancifulness as Hooper's imagination is allowed to run amok without worrying so much about the nuts and bolts. And that's rather the key, as the vision is simply grand, and it's the framework that's devised to support that vision that is the problem. When all is said and done the movie is a good time, and it is worth watching on its own merits. It's just unfortunate that the grisly whimsy is restrained, and diminished, as Hooper and Goldberg struggled to weave it into a screenplay that's far less vibrant. Be well aware of these issues, and that might be the best way to get the most out of 'Spontaneous combustion.'
Not as bad, as it's credited to being (Hooper's done far worse)
more so disappointing for me. Such an imaginative concept, which is never really tapped in to by Hooper with his economical direction and even less so in the smoky (excuse the pun) writing. It goes so sinister and over-the-top in a dead serious tone, becoming ridiculous and unfocused letting the whole pessimistic mystery / conspiracy-laced narrative being easily telegraphed to end on something completely abrupt. Because of that, the pacing goes on to be rather sluggish and Brad Dourif (cool to see him in a leading role) seems to struggle with an off-balanced performance, despite etching out a bemusedly quirky intensity to his off-colour character. Even though it's cheaply done, there's a competent technical attitude to it. However it doesn't seem to go anywhere out of the ordinary with its idea and wants to plaster in nasty jolts (which some do work) and strikingly steaming special effects (flames, flames everywhere) instead. Hooper does display some stylishly frenetic imagery (more so towards the latter end), and the camera-work is swiftly manoeuvred and the beaming score is titillating. The performances are bit all over the shop with the appearances of William Prince, Cynthia Bain, Dey Young, Jon Cypher and Melinda Dillon. Also Geroge Buck Flower and John Landis have small, but amusing cameos
especially Landis. Nothing surprises, but it's passably engaging.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesIn a promotional Fangoria interview for Exorcist 3 (1990), Brad Douriff mentioned how disappointed he was with final version of this film, and how a very interesting, promising movie was ruined by studio interference and producers during production. "You see me playing my heart out in scenes that are not working, and the reason they're not working is that movie doesn't make sense. It's almost funny. As a matter of fact, the better my acting was in some of the later scenes, the funnier film was. I found myself at the mercy of people who didn't know what they were doing. I probably shouldn't be saying this, but my feeling is, the producers destroyed it. Tobe could have made three different movies with material he had, and each one would have worked. But by the time he got it, it had changed from a love story to a suspense thriller about my character's paranoid fantasy, to a 'guy goes crazy' film about this insane killer who becomes a destructive force that's going to wipe out mankind. We went back and kind of restructured it as a love story, but it didn't really help. The beginning of the film was great, and a certain portion of my stuff was fine, but then it became stupid when all the flame stuff started happening."
- GaffesThe position of the syringe stuck in Lisa, changes.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Cinemassacre's Monster Madness: Spontaneous Combustion (2009)
- Bandes originalesI Don't Want to Set the World on Fire
Written by Eddie Durham (uncredited), Eddie Seiler (uncredited), Sol Marcus (uncredited) and Bennie Benjamin (uncredited)
Performed by The Ink Spots
Courtesy of MCA Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Spontaneous Combustion?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Budget
- 5 500 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 50 367 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 50 367 $US
- 25 févr. 1990
- Montant brut mondial
- 50 367 $US
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Spontaneous Combustion, le feu de l'au-delà (1989)?
Répondre