Les héritiers

I enjoyed book II because it showed how the family after many year's of fighting and being bitter towards each they finally realized by sticking together they could accomplish so many more things in life. I also liked how Rudy became some what of a father figure for Wesley and Billy. He tried to show them just how important family really is and being bitter about things in their life does not have to continue you have to except the past and learn from it.Once the boy's saw how Rudy was alway's there for them trying to help them learn from their mistakes overcome them with out using their fist help make them better men.He wanted them to overcome their past so they could have a better life.Abuse tore his family apart and knew it had to stop.He also taught them that a good education was very important.I would love to purchase book II to complete the story.

Really stolid potboiler, scene chewing sessions abound. The ONLY thing that set with apart from other 70's dross in the final episodes was the interaction between Nolte and Bill Smith's Falconetti, one of the great TV villains ever.

This was not meant to be a mini-series, but a series.

The original RMPM was groundbreaking television and the reason why so many restaurants are closed on Mondays even today. Monday nights were "Rich Man Poor Man night", and people stayed home to watch the mini-series since very few people had VCRs back then, and recording shows was not a common option.

After the mini-series, the producers saw an opportunity for a steady stream of cash from an open-ended series. They offered Peter Strauss more money than he thought he would ever be able to make in his life, which he of course accepted. They made the same offer to Susie Blakely, but she declined because she believed she was destined for movie stardom. She did accept to appear in the two-hour pilot on the condition that her character be killed off in the first hour!

The ratings of Book II were consistently good but not great. Production costs were very high since they had hired the very best writing talent and had them working around the clock. By the middle of the first season, it was becoming obvious that the ratings were simply not strong enough to justify the costs. The audience missed Julie Prescott / Susie Blakely and just couldn't get used to Maggie Porter / Susan Sullivan. Bringing back Kay Lenz as Kate Jordache and making her part of a love traingle with Rudy didn't lift the ratings. So they wrapped up the story toward the end of the season 1 and repackaged the whole thing as a second mini-series.

The legacy of Book II, though, was that it became a template for prime time soap operas. Dallas premiered a year later, and they were off to the races.

Interestingly, there was a plan for a Book III with major production redesign. This one would be more of a police drama vs. Soap opera. Rudy will have survived the gunfight with Falconetti, but he leaves the senate to become the Director of the CIA. The show was supposed to be about him leading an agency to battle terrorism. All networks hated the concept and refused to pick it up. But the creators hung on to the idea and made it into a TV movie called Under Siege a decade later. Peter Strauss returns but legally they were not allowed to make any references to RMPM since ABC owned the rights and the TV movie was produced by NBC. That said, the character that Strauss plays is clearly Rudy Jordache, by another name. That TV movie was meant as a pilot for a new show which was never made.

The gripping sequel to the award-winning television mini-series 'Rich Man, Poor Man' stands the test of time, and also is a stand alone representation of a well-produced piece of drama. Peter Strauss returns in fine form as Senator Rudy Jordache (the original 'Rich Man' of the title) as the story continues to chronicle his life, career and family. The story proceeds to 1968 and is transfixed to this period of time as opposed to relaying the action over a period of years as per the mini- series. The introduction of Rudy's nephew, Wesley and stepson, Billy adds a new entertaining dimension to the elements over 22 episodes. The series features some very good acting performances in support which includes Susan Blakely, Van Johnson, Ray Milland, Peter Haskell, Susan Sullivan, John Anderson and Kay Lenz. However, it is the portrayal of the psychotic 'Falconetti' by William Smith that illuminates the on- screen chills in his ongoing vendetta with anything connected with the name 'Jordache'. The young guns of the cast also shine with notable turns from Gregg Henry, James Carroll-Jordan, Penny Peyser and Kimberly Beck. The series received two Emmy-Award nominations and upon viewing the cliff-hanging courtroom scenes in Washington it's not difficult to understand why, as Rudy attempts to bring to justice the corrupt billionaire, Charles Estep; the dramatics are wonderfully executed. 'Rich Man, Poor Man - Book II' was never going to hit the heights of the classic status of the preceding mini-series, but it has achieved popular worldwide recognition as a welcome, and most enjoyable, sequel of a great story.

It is very strange to see Rich Man Poor Man (book one and two) after all these years. When I was a kid, i remember enjoy both parts. But I haven't seen it since the 80s... And on a french channel TEVA, they rerun part one and two. To be honest the two parts are really different : even if we find some similar characters and apparently the same storyline, it's really not the same thing.

the first chapter is a strong and brilliant story about the fate of two brothers. The second part gives me (now) a strange feeling : the estep/falconetti storyline is strong and full of suspense. It's a kind of dram/detective/soap show, but it's really enjoying.

I think you have to appreciate it as a different thing. My wife, who is watching the show (one and two) for the first time love both parts. I have to admitt that it was very difficult test for gregg henry to act after nick nolte. But it is great. And James Caroll Jordan (playing billy abbott) is one of the few characters in the TV history who is very hard to understand. One second, cool and charming (the perfect guy), next second (traitor and a bad guy...)

Of course, Peter STRAUSS is great like the rest of the cast, except maybe Kaye LENZ (but I suspect the dubbing - her french voice- to be in charge more than the actress).

I hope americain people can soon watch the show again.