L'espionne des Ardennes

Plot In A Paragraph: During the battle of the bulge, a sergeant (Earl Holliman) in charge of a small band of men finds a woman (Tina Louise) with a gun shot wound lying in the snow. The take her to a local town with them where they are staying at an inn as they await further orders.

There are two parts to this movie, one that deals with the growing lack of respect that the group and in particular one soldier, a pollack named Skee (A young Burt Reynolds in only his second movie) have for the sergeant and the fact that the sergeant and Skee both have the hots for the injured woman. And one where (Howard Keel) tries to warn his superiors that his men are about to be attacked and over run any time soon.

The contrast between Holliman's and Reynolds characters could not be more different. Holliman is a love sick school boy towards to woman, where as Reynolds is the confident Alpha male who will have her, if she wants him to or not. This is the second movie in a row where Reynolds has raped a woman during his early career. Luckily he did not get typecast in such roles.

In a side note several sequences of action are repeated during the final battle scene.

This feels a little older than it is for an American movie. Still, it does manage to make it interesting with the way they shot a lot of the war sequences and the pure chaos that also shows the result, but in the end, it started to repeat a lot of shots. Besides those few scenes, most of the movie is indoors. The acting was also really good. But the plot confused me about what they intended. This is probably the first time that, when watching a WW2 movie, I feel like siding with the Germans even when they are shown as the villains. The Americans are portrayed as either lazy, compassionless, spineless, or straight up evil, and from what I can understand, they didn't exactly want those characters to be like that; they wanted them to be complicated, but ended up like this. This may not be the worst in this case, especially for that time, but the way sexual assault is used so lightly and the whole point is surrounding the men to the point that even the victim is shown to be sad for her man more than herself in that situation is crazy.

This film definitely has a handful of issues that are a tad bothersome but on the whole I enjoyed it.

It's not the kind of film you're going to recommend to friends and family but if you're a fan of the genre or a WWII buff, it's worth watching.

I was annoyed that both sides were using the same tanks but there have been better films and more famous films to commit that sin. I also shook my head that the "German" tanks didn't even have the right cross painted on them but that's not something everyone will notice.

There are a couple of shots that are repeated during the final battle segment, one in particular of a tank leading 3 rows of troops through a space between two buildings, along a narrow road must be shown 3 or 4 times.

It is an oversimplified telling of actual events but there is a payoff at the end. Had this film been even 10 or 15 minutes longer, I would have rated it lower and not recommended it for even die hard fans. But they didn't make that mistake thankfully!

What was supposed to be a tense, suspenseful war drama turned out to be rather confusing and boring. Sometimes these spy flicks go over my head, so if that's your genre of choice, you might feel differently about this one. I ended up writing other reviews while the movie was running to distract me from the boredom.

Tina Louise plays a German spy, but because she's an attractive and vulnerable woman, the soldiers who rescued her after her injury don't suspect a thing. They're too busy fighting over her to notice she's sneaking out secrets to the enemy. Howard Keel, Earl Holliman, Burt Reynolds, Carleton Young, Warner Anderson, Clem Harvey, Marty Ingels, and James Dobson are the men in the film, but with hardly any fight scenes, Armored Command doesn't really feel like a war movie. It's a little slow, and even though I just finished watching it a couple of days ago, I can't even remember what happens in the end.

Armored Command finds Tina Louise playing a German spy plunked down in the middle of a neglected front during the Battle Of The Bulge counteroffensive with the Germans still trying to pull something out. Tina's even given a shoulder wound courtesy of the Wehrmacht to make her story convincing.

For those of you who are used to seeing Tina Louise as the vapid movie star on Gilligan's Island this will be a revelation. She's quite the cool and ruthless character.

She's left out on the front lines for a passing American patrol to find and one headed by Sergeant Earl Holliman does. She's taken back to their billet and of course everyone starts thinking with their hormones. Especially Holliman and Burt Reynolds who was in his second big screen film in Armored Command.

In the meantime the commander of the area, Colonel Howard Keel is convinced an offensive will come through there, but he's having trouble convincing the higher ups of his notion. It seems to Holliman's squad to get the job of digging up the evidence to prove Keel's theories and they've got a spy in their midst.

Armored Command was shot on location in Germany near Munich and Howard Keel relates in his memoirs he was given the job of directing some of the second unit battle scenes which he enjoyed. He did not enjoy however when one of his extras which were some US Army troops stationed in Germany nearly got killed.

Keel gets on to Louise early, but then she gets on to him getting on to her. They have an interesting battle of wits as neither of them are stupid.

The film was done by Allied Artists and maybe a bigger studio with better production values could have gotten a higher rating for it. As it is it's not a bad war film and those into that genre will probably like it.