Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueA young woman married into an aristocratic English family finds life with her husband dull and decides to elope with a Canadian. However her mother-in-law, who did something similar thirty y... Tout lireA young woman married into an aristocratic English family finds life with her husband dull and decides to elope with a Canadian. However her mother-in-law, who did something similar thirty years before, tries to prevent her.A young woman married into an aristocratic English family finds life with her husband dull and decides to elope with a Canadian. However her mother-in-law, who did something similar thirty years before, tries to prevent her.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
William H. O'Brien
- Footman
- (as William O'Brien)
Jack Deery
- Dickie
- (non crédité)
Herschel Graham
- Party Guest
- (non crédité)
Vera Lewis
- Duchess of Brocklehurst
- (non crédité)
Edgar Norton
- Party Guest
- (non crédité)
Paul Power
- Party Guest
- (non crédité)
Frank Reicher
- Duke of Brocklehurst
- (non crédité)
Larry Steers
- Party Guest
- (non crédité)
Clarence Wilson
- George - Ted's Valet
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
"Strictly Unconventional" is a heavily abbreviated version of a W. Sommerset Maugham play. I say heavily abbreviated because the film was originally 72 minutes but after its debut, MGM hacked 17 minutes off the movie. This truncated version is the only one now available and because it was hacked to pieces, I much prefer the 1925 silent version.
When the story begins, you see that Elizabeth is married to an incredibly dull man, Arnold. But she has a surprise for him...she's invited Arnold's mother and her husband to stay with them. This is a huge surprise because Arnold's mother left him and her husband many years ago....and they've had no interaction since! Now the wife didn't invite the mother just to help her husband patch things up with her....this wife is also contemplating leaving Arnold and thinks his mother's adultery is somehow romantic! TO make things worse, it turns out that it won't just be the four of them....Arnold's father just arrived! What's next? See the film.
The problems with this film are all in the final act. The story seems abbreviated and loses its way...probably because of the excised footage. Because of that, much of the cleverness of the original film is missing and the story just okay and no better.
When the story begins, you see that Elizabeth is married to an incredibly dull man, Arnold. But she has a surprise for him...she's invited Arnold's mother and her husband to stay with them. This is a huge surprise because Arnold's mother left him and her husband many years ago....and they've had no interaction since! Now the wife didn't invite the mother just to help her husband patch things up with her....this wife is also contemplating leaving Arnold and thinks his mother's adultery is somehow romantic! TO make things worse, it turns out that it won't just be the four of them....Arnold's father just arrived! What's next? See the film.
The problems with this film are all in the final act. The story seems abbreviated and loses its way...probably because of the excised footage. Because of that, much of the cleverness of the original film is missing and the story just okay and no better.
I had never heard of Catherine Dale Owen before,which is hardly surprising given that she only appeared in about 6 films.However after this performance i do not think that i will ever forget her.She seems to enunciate every word to twice its natural length.I think that she must have gone to the vocal coach featured in "Singing In The Rain".There is one scene where she is seated having a discussion.Every time the other actor talks she looks away with a doleful stare.When it comes to her lines she turns and almost stares into the camera as if reading an idiot board.Then when she speaks her lines she seems to want to make a different hand gesture for every word.The tone of her voice hardly altering.So to Catherine i retrospectively award the Razzie for the worst actress of 1930.A well merited award!
This turgid screen version of Somerset Maugham's "The Circle" suffers not only from the dated story, but from performances by seasoned silent performers who seem absolutely overwhelmed by the sound equipment. The first scene suffers as the juveniles insist of making sure their emotions can be read in the second balcony. Even Lewis Stone seems ill at ease, until Ernest Torrence and Alison Skipworth come on.
Torrence is a delight, complaining about his dentures, and Skipworth is wonderful. The camera is not quite immobile, but it does move leadenly -- quite appropriately in following Torrence, but it does move rapidly when needed to maintain composition -- something that modern film makers don't seem to think important But Lewis Stone's register runs all over the place, overacting in antique style even for 1930 with the youngsters, and fairly natural with Torrence and Skipworth. The total effect is bad.
Torrence is a delight, complaining about his dentures, and Skipworth is wonderful. The camera is not quite immobile, but it does move leadenly -- quite appropriately in following Torrence, but it does move rapidly when needed to maintain composition -- something that modern film makers don't seem to think important But Lewis Stone's register runs all over the place, overacting in antique style even for 1930 with the youngsters, and fairly natural with Torrence and Skipworth. The total effect is bad.
This film has its weaknesses, starting with its silly title (the original title of the W. Somerset Maugham play it's based on, "The Circle," is better and should have been retained) and some of the ridiculous makeups the actors are forced to wear (Lewis Stone especially it took me a while to discern his familiar features under all that greasepaint and hair cream), but all in all it's a good drawing room comedy/melodrama. Like Oscar Wilde and Noël Coward, Maugham was a (mostly) Gay writer whose sensibility came out (so to speak) in a jaundiced view of heterosexuality, and there are several unusual aspects to this plot including the fascinating twist that 30 years after they did the dashingly romantic thing of running off together without first divorcing their spouses, Lord Porteous (Ernest Torrence) and Lady Champion-Cheney (Alison Skipworth) are as miserable as any married couple could possibly be after that length of time. I'd heard so many bad things about Catherine Dale Owen over the years that it was a surprise to see one of her films and actually find her quite good energetic, high-spirited and fully in command of her role and of course it's also always a treat to see Alison Skipworth, the one person who ever stole a scene from W. C. Fields and the principal villain (a sex-changed version of the Sydney Greenstreet role) in the otherwise pretty dismal second version of "The Maltese Falcon," called "Satan met a Lady." Her costume representing an attempt to dress as a youthful coquette, defying her extra years and bulk is itself a piece of minor film-making genius. David Burton's direction is mostly commonplace but has some inspired moments, notably the animation of the young Lady Champion-Cheney's photo in the album early on. And at only 56 minutes, the film lasts just as long as it needs to for the story it has to tell and isn't padded out to fill extra running time the way so many films are today.
Well, it's a somerset maugham story, so we know its going to be a drama, with lots of pain for someone at some point. The story opens with Arnold Champion Cheney (Tyrell Davis) fawning over a chippendale chair he just received. We see signs of trouble, as his wife Elizabeth (Catherine Owen) complains that he likes his belongings more than he likes her. Then it is announced that Champion's mother (Alison Skipworth) is coming for an unexpected visit. LOVE Alison Skipworth, so fun to see her as Lady Champion, stirring things up. Elizabeth starts spending time alone with Ted the Canadian, so we can see there is trouble in paradise. At one point, we see Tyrell Davis with an "alfalfa" type hairdo... not sure what the point of that was ? The main story is about the friction between Elizabeth and Arnold, and with Arnold's parents as well. Lots of dinner party scenes, lots of talking, but you can tell we are missing some of the story, with 20 minutes cut from the film. No big deal really. Not Alison Skipworth's best work. This was her first talkie.... she was SO much better in her later films. See her in one of the W.C. Fields films instead. Lewis Stone (from Grand Hotel) is in here as well.
Owen stopped acting in 1931, so she doesn't seem to have done well in the talkies. Directed by David Burton, who only directed about 15 films, mostly in the 1930s. He doesn't seem to have stuck around long. Screenplay by Sylvia Thalberg, the sister of big-time producer Irving Thalberg.
Owen stopped acting in 1931, so she doesn't seem to have done well in the talkies. Directed by David Burton, who only directed about 15 films, mostly in the 1930s. He doesn't seem to have stuck around long. Screenplay by Sylvia Thalberg, the sister of big-time producer Irving Thalberg.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesWhen it was originally released in April 1930, Strictly Unconventional ran 72 minutes, but, by the time it found its way to New York City in July 1930, (for a one day showing on a double bill at Loew's), MGM had cut it to 54 minutes, and this is the version which survives today on Turner Classic Movies.
- GaffesToutes les informations contiennent des spoilers
- ConnexionsVersion of The Circle (1925)
- Bandes originalesKunstlerleben (Artist's Life), Op. 316
(1867) (uncredited)
Music by Johann Strauss
Played as dance music by the orchestra at the party
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée55 minutes
- Couleur
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Strictly Unconventional (1930) officially released in India in English?
Répondre