Biography of a Bachelor Girl

Robert Montgomery is the editor of a muckraking magazine. He wants Ann Harding to write her memoirs. She is a painter who has gained a notorious reputation on two continents. She returns to the US broke, and accepts the offer. As she works with Montgomery on the book, she grows kinder and Montgomery grouchier. Also old boyfriend, Edward Everett Horton shows up with fiancée Una Merkel and her father, Charles Richman, who fear for Horton's political future if all is known.

There are hints that the S. N. Behrman play this was based on had been hot stuff, and had it been released a couple of years earlier, it would have been very funny, particularly given the farceurs in its cast. I can see the ghosts of many opportunities for exits with slammed doors and circumlocutious language. However, in those two years, the production code had passed, and not only might no one even discuss what Miss Harding had done - not that it was necessary- but no one gets angry enough to slam a door. Montgomery expends all his energy in angry speeches, Miss Harding is too much the lady, and Horton more childlike.

It's probably all that MGM figures they could get past the Hays office. Too bad.

Cynical magazine editor Richard 'Dickie' Kurt (Robert Montgomery) is desperate to sign up artist Marion Forsythe (Ann Harding) for a biography. He doesn't care about her artistry. He's much more enticed by rumors of her celebrity relationships. Leander 'Bunny' Nolan (Edward Everett Horton) is running for the Senate and fears his past fling with Marion could turn into a scandal.

Kurt is too mean. First, his lack of bedside manners would make signing Marion nearly impossible. I question how a guy like him would get such a task. I guess an editor could be that bitter and I can see a hardnosed reporter like him rising up to the job. He just wouldn't be asked to do something that needs him to be nice. More than that, Montgomery is playing so hard that he has no chemistry with Ann Harding. It's almost reflexive that she's going in the complete opposite direction. The movie is trying to use the opposites attract proposition. Normally, romantic combat works but he's just too harsh. It's not his anger. It's his hate.

She's nearly forgotten today, but Ann Harding was a true cinema aristocrat in the '30s, a movie star who didn't look like one (she wore practically no makeup) but was lovely all the same. She didn't act like one, either. Here, she's a free- thinking artist (referred to by other characters as "Bohemian," and it's clearly an insult) whose projected tell-all autobio is going to put an old flame's political career in jeopardy, and she's so obviously more intelligent than any of her co- players that you can't take your eyes off her. Calm, ladylike, and vaguely amused by her surroundings, she's a lot like her contemporary Irene Dunne, but less forced. The movie, from a smart S.N. Behrman stage comedy, is a civilized affair where characters bat around words like "propinquity" without flinching and the slowish pacing feels right. Perfect it's not, particularly in the male casting: Robert Montgomery, as her perpetually dissatisfied editor, doesn't stint on the character's unlikability, which leaves one rooting only halfheartedly for their romance to alight. And Edward Everett Horton, as her compromised ex-beau, isn't believable for a moment, being so obviously... Edward Everett Horton. On the other hand, Edward Arnold, the screen's best Evil Plutocrat of the '30s, is here a quiet, sympathetic spurned beau, and completely charming. It's a pleasant journey back to a time where the general public was more sophisticated, though without Ms. Harding's presence, it wouldn't add up to nearly as much.

This for me very unsatisfying movie seemed to change viewpoints half-way through. Most of it is just tepid fluff, but on occasion in the first part the magazine editor, played by Montgomery, makes a few short speeches about bringing down vapid politicians like the would-be one played by E E Horton, and big money, like Horton's soon-to-be father-in-law, Kennicutt. In that sense he sounds like a humorless version of Clark Gable's newspaper reporter in "It Happened One Night", which had been released just the year before. Most Americans were suffering through the Depression by 1935, when this picture came out, so there was a ready market for criticism of the wealthy, who continued to enjoy life while the rest struggled to keep their heads above water.

But as the picture goes on, Montgomery's character sounds angrier and angrier about this. And our way of viewing his anger is changed by Harding's character, who tells him that, while she originally saw him as a crusader, she now sees him as wanting to persecute the wealthy.

From that point on, Montgomery's character is presented as some sort of closet Communist because his father was killed by strike-breakers during a coal miners' labor unrest. And Harding's character, who has lived among the wealthy, does not want anything to do with that. The very ambiguous final scene leaves us up in the air on whether she will accept him as she has grown to see him - and told us to see him.

But how many in the audience would care? There is absolutely NO chemistry between Harding and Montgomery, none whatsoever. It does not help that she is made up to look much older than he, whereas in fact Harding only had two years on her costar.

In the same respect, she comes off as so understated in this movie that we cannot believe she had torrid affairs with many famous men. She really seems almost sexless.

There are minor faults as well, such as the Tennessee accents. The leads, except for Montgomery, are all supposed to be from the Volunteer State, and on occasion each attempts a slight Southern accent. But then it vanishes completely.

I got nothing out of this movie other than the occasional pleasure of Harding's voice when she spoke softly. That was really very beautiful.

The rest just became aggravating.

... because you can tell by the dull empty stretches that everybody involved would just love to make a precode, would love to come out and say what is being insinuated, but they just can't.

The film is about a magazine editor, Richard Kurt (Robert Montgomery) who wants to pay a globe trotting artist who has had many affairs (Ann Harding as Marion Forsythe) to write her biography. He's actually not expecting her to write it so much as have her tell her various stories and then he can translate it into salacious text.

Marion agrees because she needs the money, but the two have a basic difference in viewpoint because Marion is a very tolerant individual and Kurt is not, and he seems to love not only the amount of money to be made in the biography but the idea of exposing the publicly sanctimonious people with which Marion has been involved. Then there is Edward Everett Hornton as a bag of wind who is running for senate who was Marion's first love in Tennessee, and he fears if his name is mentioned in this biography it will be the end of his senate hopes.

This film starts out fast funny and energetic with some great scenes and dialogue, but about a half hour in it begins to bog down, because the film simply is not allowed to come out and say the things that are insinuated. I really love Robert Montgomery, but the end of the precode era really took a bite out of his career for a few years as he was great at playing the precode playboy and those roles no longer existed. Although I will say it was interesting to see Montgomery play a role angry rather than glib as he did in so many other films.