NOTE IMDb
5,6/10
2,5 k
MA NOTE
Depuis qu'elle a perdu son mari, Sophie s'efforce de gérer son deuil, son travail à plein temps et l'éducation de sa fille dévastée. Peu après, un ancien physicien révèle l'existence d'une m... Tout lireDepuis qu'elle a perdu son mari, Sophie s'efforce de gérer son deuil, son travail à plein temps et l'éducation de sa fille dévastée. Peu après, un ancien physicien révèle l'existence d'une machine secrète permettant de modifier le temps.Depuis qu'elle a perdu son mari, Sophie s'efforce de gérer son deuil, son travail à plein temps et l'éducation de sa fille dévastée. Peu après, un ancien physicien révèle l'existence d'une machine secrète permettant de modifier le temps.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 2 nominations au total
Coel Mahal
- Mary-Lou
- (as Coél Mahal)
Anika Contos
- Nurse
- (non crédité)
Avis à la une
However, the concept is good.
What if you could kill somebody in the past
Such quandaries hold the potential to produce a fantastic film.
But we don't see their past, and how it could affect the present; instead, a different present simply emerges. It made the director and writer's job much easier, as they lack original ideas
The dialogues are considerably basic, and the scenes are even more so. Standing at the open fridge, pondering what to take out... There are so many pointless moments to fill the film.
The actors struggle with the non-adapted dialogues and non-working connections.
It's all so superficial, simplistic, almost parodying.
Wasting my time made me upset and I interrupted watching after about 10 minutes, but then I read about the topic and decided to give it a go.
It is not given a second chance.
What if you could kill somebody in the past
- whose action kills people and turns people miserable
- whose immoral action turns people miserable
- whose simple action turns people miserable
- who simply turns you miserable
Such quandaries hold the potential to produce a fantastic film.
But we don't see their past, and how it could affect the present; instead, a different present simply emerges. It made the director and writer's job much easier, as they lack original ideas
The dialogues are considerably basic, and the scenes are even more so. Standing at the open fridge, pondering what to take out... There are so many pointless moments to fill the film.
The actors struggle with the non-adapted dialogues and non-working connections.
It's all so superficial, simplistic, almost parodying.
Wasting my time made me upset and I interrupted watching after about 10 minutes, but then I read about the topic and decided to give it a go.
It is not given a second chance.
Whoever reviewed this and called it "repetitive" does a disservice to the movie.. I personally would call it anything but!
You have a simple structure that expectedly raises the stakes of using a "time machine" for personal purposes, specially when the effects are as impactful. There's no buildup, but it is more "revelative" as it develops. It does become predictable, though. It's also a tad too long, the pacing is somewhat slow in many parts, and lacks in engagement. But I can't see it ending in any other way, as it accomplishes what it sets out to do.
If it raises any questions, they are for the viewer to ponder, as the movie isn't interested in saying anything else nor has the room for it. And if the film's budget is preventing you from enjoying the story, then you probably shouldn't be looking at low-budget sci-fi.
I would compare this to a Black Mirror episode, and was enjoyable as such.
You have a simple structure that expectedly raises the stakes of using a "time machine" for personal purposes, specially when the effects are as impactful. There's no buildup, but it is more "revelative" as it develops. It does become predictable, though. It's also a tad too long, the pacing is somewhat slow in many parts, and lacks in engagement. But I can't see it ending in any other way, as it accomplishes what it sets out to do.
If it raises any questions, they are for the viewer to ponder, as the movie isn't interested in saying anything else nor has the room for it. And if the film's budget is preventing you from enjoying the story, then you probably shouldn't be looking at low-budget sci-fi.
I would compare this to a Black Mirror episode, and was enjoyable as such.
IN A NUTSHELL:
Since losing her husband, Sophie has struggled to manage grief, a full-time job, and parenting her devastated daughter, but when a former physicist reveals a secret time-bending machine, Sophie will be faced with an impossible choice for a chance at happiness again.
The film was directed and written by Jared Moshe. Well done, Jared! Already, the film has been nominated for "Best Film" at the Fantasia Film Festival.
It's helpful to know that the word "aporia" means an irresolvable, internal contradiction or logical disjunction in an argument or theory (Oxford Dictionary). It's the perfect title for this film.
THINGS I LIKED: I've been a fan of Judy Greer for decades. She always gets roles as the best friend or some supporting character, so I'm happy to see her as the lead in this movie. She absolutely crushes it.
All of the cast members did a great job and include Edi Gathegi, Peyman Moaadi, and Faithe Herman.
Like a lot of films these days, this one tackles the human perspective of the multiverse. I love time travel movies and loops.
I love twists, and this movie forces you to think deeply about choices and consequences.
Most movies lately tell audiences to just do whatever makes YOU happy, with no regard for responsibility or consequences. I really like that this film explores those ideas deeper.
The color palette looked muted, which I thought was a great choice because the story takes a look at reality and alternate realities. The choices weren't always clear either.
THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE: The mechanical contraption that the former physicists built looks ridiculous.
The film completely glosses over the daughter's reaction to how her father is now alive. How is it determined who will have memories and who will not? There are some plot holes like that, so try not to overthink the story too much.
The film moves quite slowly.
I didn't feel a lot of chemistry between the leading couple.
There was a rumor that this film is related to the Cloverfield franchise, but it's not.
TIPS FOR PARENTS: Young kids will be very bored.
Profanity and F-bombs Talk of a drunk driver who killed a man Some alcohol and cigarettes People talk about killing other people.
The film was directed and written by Jared Moshe. Well done, Jared! Already, the film has been nominated for "Best Film" at the Fantasia Film Festival.
It's helpful to know that the word "aporia" means an irresolvable, internal contradiction or logical disjunction in an argument or theory (Oxford Dictionary). It's the perfect title for this film.
THINGS I LIKED: I've been a fan of Judy Greer for decades. She always gets roles as the best friend or some supporting character, so I'm happy to see her as the lead in this movie. She absolutely crushes it.
All of the cast members did a great job and include Edi Gathegi, Peyman Moaadi, and Faithe Herman.
Like a lot of films these days, this one tackles the human perspective of the multiverse. I love time travel movies and loops.
I love twists, and this movie forces you to think deeply about choices and consequences.
Most movies lately tell audiences to just do whatever makes YOU happy, with no regard for responsibility or consequences. I really like that this film explores those ideas deeper.
The color palette looked muted, which I thought was a great choice because the story takes a look at reality and alternate realities. The choices weren't always clear either.
THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE: The mechanical contraption that the former physicists built looks ridiculous.
The film completely glosses over the daughter's reaction to how her father is now alive. How is it determined who will have memories and who will not? There are some plot holes like that, so try not to overthink the story too much.
The film moves quite slowly.
I didn't feel a lot of chemistry between the leading couple.
There was a rumor that this film is related to the Cloverfield franchise, but it's not.
TIPS FOR PARENTS: Young kids will be very bored.
Profanity and F-bombs Talk of a drunk driver who killed a man Some alcohol and cigarettes People talk about killing other people.
Anything related to the concept of time and I will always jump right in, notwithstanding the eventual culmination. Suffice it to say that the same morbid curiosity had brought me here in the first place.
Now, I don't regret tuning in and checking this out, but I do have qualms about the film, specifically in regard to its lacklustre writing, which couldn't take advantage of the potential it originally possessed.
The execution has turned out to be underwhelming in practically every aspect, not just from a narrative standpoint but also from a technical as well as from a performance perspective. Nothing worked; nothing substantial was achieved. It feels exceedingly bland and strikingly uninspiring.
Now, I don't regret tuning in and checking this out, but I do have qualms about the film, specifically in regard to its lacklustre writing, which couldn't take advantage of the potential it originally possessed.
The execution has turned out to be underwhelming in practically every aspect, not just from a narrative standpoint but also from a technical as well as from a performance perspective. Nothing worked; nothing substantial was achieved. It feels exceedingly bland and strikingly uninspiring.
Watched The Aporia Starring Judy Greer(Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol.3) as Sophie, Edi Gathegi(For All Mankind) as Malcolm Rice, Payman Maadi(Camp X-Ray) as Jabir Karim and Faithe Herman(Shazam!) as Riley Rice.
I thought the movie was an interesting take at time travel also it got the physics of it right time travel would be instant also in attempt to undo damage done results in creating branching timelines Sophie, Malcolm and Jabir learns this is a very Black Mirror/Twilightzone-esque movie the ending was predictable but still good
Amazing Score From H. Scott Salinas(Evolution), Writing and Directing By Jared Moshe(Destricted) the ending was predictable but still good great indie sci-fi movie 8/10.
I thought the movie was an interesting take at time travel also it got the physics of it right time travel would be instant also in attempt to undo damage done results in creating branching timelines Sophie, Malcolm and Jabir learns this is a very Black Mirror/Twilightzone-esque movie the ending was predictable but still good
Amazing Score From H. Scott Salinas(Evolution), Writing and Directing By Jared Moshe(Destricted) the ending was predictable but still good great indie sci-fi movie 8/10.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesShot in 17 days.
- GaffesEver since the development of nuclear weapons, it has become clear that it is not possible to keep major scientific breakthroughs of that kind a secret forever. Sooner or later, somebody else will have the same idea and eventually the breakthrough will be replicated. This is an especially prominent concept in the world of science and engineering, where Mal and Jabir are rooted. Yet none of the protagonists ever mention the prospect in the movie, even though they managed to achieve the breakthrough with minimal funding while government agencies have infinitely greater resources to work with.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Half in the Bag: 2023 Catch-up (Part 2) (2023)
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Aporia?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 21 587 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 14 064 $US
- 13 août 2023
- Montant brut mondial
- 21 587 $US
- Durée1 heure 44 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant