Une aventure mystérieuse au coeur de la ruée vers l'or de 1860 en Nouvelle-Zélande. Il y a tout ce qui fait un bon drame : meurtre, amour et vengeance, alors que les hommes et les femmes voy... Tout lireUne aventure mystérieuse au coeur de la ruée vers l'or de 1860 en Nouvelle-Zélande. Il y a tout ce qui fait un bon drame : meurtre, amour et vengeance, alors que les hommes et les femmes voyagent dans le monde pour faire fortune.Une aventure mystérieuse au coeur de la ruée vers l'or de 1860 en Nouvelle-Zélande. Il y a tout ce qui fait un bon drame : meurtre, amour et vengeance, alors que les hommes et les femmes voyagent dans le monde pour faire fortune.
- Récompenses
- 4 victoires et 1 nomination au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
The Daily Mail gave this series a bad review for being difficult to understand and The Guardian gave it a good review, that told me all I needed to know about whether I was likely to enjoy it or not and I'm glad I gave it a chance.
I didn't find the story hard to follow at all, it jumps between time but it's not difficult to keep up with. Visually it's stunning and the story is interesting and unique, I thoroughly enjoyed this series and am considering reading the book.
I didn't find the story hard to follow at all, it jumps between time but it's not difficult to keep up with. Visually it's stunning and the story is interesting and unique, I thoroughly enjoyed this series and am considering reading the book.
It appears convoluted until you've watched two episodes. Give it a minute to set the table and if you don't care to do that then don't rate the entire series on the 30 mins of one episode you watched.
A young man and woman meet for the first time on board a ship bound for the new world. There is an instant and almost magical chemistry between them. Their story unfolds during the mid-19th century New Zealand gold rush. Before watching this six-episode series, I confess I was completely unaware that New Zealand had a gold rush.
Anna Wetherell (Eve Hewson) and Emery Staines (Himesh Patel) agree to meet again when they arrive but their plans are thwarted by nefarious means. Will they ever be reunited?
Sadly, I found Anna's fate very plausible. An attractive young woman, intelligent but illiterate, alone in a strange land with no money and no connections. Easy prey. Although Anna's dreams of starting a new life are dashed and she eventually succumbs to opium to cope with her circumstances, she never competey loses her inner strength even when she suffers a terrible personal tragedy.
Although Anna is the heroine of the story, we also follow the fortunes of Emery Staines as well as the characters Anna and Emery come into contact with. All of the actors give excellent performances but Eve Hewson is outstanding.
I loved it. Beautiful scenery and a terrific cast brought this dark fairytale to life. Some viewers found the time-jump aspect of this series difficult to follow. I did not have a problem with it.
Anna Wetherell (Eve Hewson) and Emery Staines (Himesh Patel) agree to meet again when they arrive but their plans are thwarted by nefarious means. Will they ever be reunited?
Sadly, I found Anna's fate very plausible. An attractive young woman, intelligent but illiterate, alone in a strange land with no money and no connections. Easy prey. Although Anna's dreams of starting a new life are dashed and she eventually succumbs to opium to cope with her circumstances, she never competey loses her inner strength even when she suffers a terrible personal tragedy.
Although Anna is the heroine of the story, we also follow the fortunes of Emery Staines as well as the characters Anna and Emery come into contact with. All of the actors give excellent performances but Eve Hewson is outstanding.
I loved it. Beautiful scenery and a terrific cast brought this dark fairytale to life. Some viewers found the time-jump aspect of this series difficult to follow. I did not have a problem with it.
The novel on which this series is based is sophisticated and the plot is complex. It is original and mature writing (it won the prestigious Man Booker Prize) but it's definitely not easy reading.
Given this, it's asking too much to expect mere entertainment from a TV adaptation. The story is too complex to be reduced to the level of simplicity that many people want and expect. The novel demands active involvement for it to be rewarding; the TV version likewise.
It's near-impossible to reduce a nearly 1,000 page novel to six hours of television. If this sounds like justification for the TV version's complexity, that's exactly what I'm trying to do.
It's certainly isn't easy going, but it is rewarding if you're prepared to provide input yourself - just like the novel.
Those of us with NZTV "On Demand" have been able to binge The Luminaries.
Yes, I have read the book. When I have read the original work, I believe in taking care not to be overly critical of film, or in this case, mini-series, adaptions, as that is a difficult process. That said, I found this adaption simply awful even in that forgiving context.
The best aspect of the novel, is a technical one: a somewhat fresh structure within the otherwise standard and well trod genre of romance novel, or combined romance+crime-drama novel. Ingenious? No. Fresh? Yes. Specifically the central 12 astrological symbol based men whose aspects are the core part of the story telling mechanism of the novel.
Sadly the mini-series adaption keeps the overly worn romance/crime drama tropes, and there are just an endless stream of them, and completely glosses over the clever technical aspects of the original work. In the end what we have is a standard soap opera. It is profoundly dumbed down to the point of being an insult to the audience; who the makers and adapters must think are generally idiots. It is not as if some of the complexity, nuance, are gone -- they all are gone.
The acting, cinematography and certainly the art direction, are above average. But the narrative structure is for the simple minded, with all the inventiveness it seems carefully removed. The dialogue is has had every element of irony, subtlety removed. The most interesting book characters are turned into shallow two dimensional cut-outs. One character, who in the novel is a essentially a catalyzing impetus, bizarrely becomes the lead character in the adaption,. Yet she is given no compelling, or interesting story. Also the novel refreshingly did not moralize in a heavy handed way. The bigotry for example are presented matter of fact, which is effective. Yet the adaption is patently moralizing, and hamfisted at it as well. It is just a cheap shot to be saying -- "look at this! 1860's era New Zealand setters had bigoted views!" Really? Who on the globe did not at that time."
In the end this is a hollow and superficial viewing experience. We are not in the 1970s or 1980's television era, but in the golden age of series and limited series work. The age of Fargo, True Detective, Chernobyl, Rome, Boardwalk Empire, House of Cards, and a litany of smart and very well written work.
Sadly, "The Luminaries" mini-series adaption, specifically the plot and screen writing, takes us back to the junk age of television.
Yes, I have read the book. When I have read the original work, I believe in taking care not to be overly critical of film, or in this case, mini-series, adaptions, as that is a difficult process. That said, I found this adaption simply awful even in that forgiving context.
The best aspect of the novel, is a technical one: a somewhat fresh structure within the otherwise standard and well trod genre of romance novel, or combined romance+crime-drama novel. Ingenious? No. Fresh? Yes. Specifically the central 12 astrological symbol based men whose aspects are the core part of the story telling mechanism of the novel.
Sadly the mini-series adaption keeps the overly worn romance/crime drama tropes, and there are just an endless stream of them, and completely glosses over the clever technical aspects of the original work. In the end what we have is a standard soap opera. It is profoundly dumbed down to the point of being an insult to the audience; who the makers and adapters must think are generally idiots. It is not as if some of the complexity, nuance, are gone -- they all are gone.
The acting, cinematography and certainly the art direction, are above average. But the narrative structure is for the simple minded, with all the inventiveness it seems carefully removed. The dialogue is has had every element of irony, subtlety removed. The most interesting book characters are turned into shallow two dimensional cut-outs. One character, who in the novel is a essentially a catalyzing impetus, bizarrely becomes the lead character in the adaption,. Yet she is given no compelling, or interesting story. Also the novel refreshingly did not moralize in a heavy handed way. The bigotry for example are presented matter of fact, which is effective. Yet the adaption is patently moralizing, and hamfisted at it as well. It is just a cheap shot to be saying -- "look at this! 1860's era New Zealand setters had bigoted views!" Really? Who on the globe did not at that time."
In the end this is a hollow and superficial viewing experience. We are not in the 1970s or 1980's television era, but in the golden age of series and limited series work. The age of Fargo, True Detective, Chernobyl, Rome, Boardwalk Empire, House of Cards, and a litany of smart and very well written work.
Sadly, "The Luminaries" mini-series adaption, specifically the plot and screen writing, takes us back to the junk age of television.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesBased on the book by the same name, written by Eleanor Catton, which won the Man Booker prize in 2013
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How many seasons does The Luminaries have?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Durée
- 1h(60 min)
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant