Christian Wolff fait appel à son esprit brillant et à ses méthodes pas très cool pour résoudre l'énigme du meurtre d'un chef du Trésor.Christian Wolff fait appel à son esprit brillant et à ses méthodes pas très cool pour résoudre l'énigme du meurtre d'un chef du Trésor.Christian Wolff fait appel à son esprit brillant et à ses méthodes pas très cool pour résoudre l'énigme du meurtre d'un chef du Trésor.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 2 nominations au total
Fernando Chien
- Sorkis
- (as Fernando Funan Chien)
Avis à la une
I really enjoyed the first 'The Accountant' so had high expectations for the follow up.
Sadly, I was very dissappointed.
The first film had some logic, it made sense, it had a story. So made the all action nonsense plausible and therefore excusable as 'artistic license.
The Accountant 2 is all action nonsense.
It makes very little sense. Very weak on story and logic i.e. Not believable for the audience to invest in it.
E.g. Why would Ray King in retirement, spend all his money 'investigating' alone and particularly for one child ?
Why would Chris (Affleck) reveal his computer help source (Justine) and her location so glibly.
It was absurd how the woman assassin was supposed to be the woman in the picture, It was also absurd how she was more like a terminator than a person.
And there are many more such issues, that prevent the story from flowing logically and therefore immersing the audience in a journey.
Instead you are repeatedly 'jolted' out, asking what? Why? When? Sort of questions, which don't have answers.
Ben Affleck is looking a bit aged and gaunt, but he and the guy who plays Braxton , played their parts compentently, but were let down by the weak script.
It does have some laughs, It's not terrible, just very mediocre, certainly nowhere near as good as the first film.
Would I watch this again ? No, it's too glib and lacks cohesion.
Yet, I have watched the first film several times and I will watch it again.
Very dissappointed and I felt this was a missed opportunity.
Not worth a full price cinema ticket.
Sadly, I was very dissappointed.
The first film had some logic, it made sense, it had a story. So made the all action nonsense plausible and therefore excusable as 'artistic license.
The Accountant 2 is all action nonsense.
It makes very little sense. Very weak on story and logic i.e. Not believable for the audience to invest in it.
E.g. Why would Ray King in retirement, spend all his money 'investigating' alone and particularly for one child ?
Why would Chris (Affleck) reveal his computer help source (Justine) and her location so glibly.
It was absurd how the woman assassin was supposed to be the woman in the picture, It was also absurd how she was more like a terminator than a person.
And there are many more such issues, that prevent the story from flowing logically and therefore immersing the audience in a journey.
Instead you are repeatedly 'jolted' out, asking what? Why? When? Sort of questions, which don't have answers.
Ben Affleck is looking a bit aged and gaunt, but he and the guy who plays Braxton , played their parts compentently, but were let down by the weak script.
It does have some laughs, It's not terrible, just very mediocre, certainly nowhere near as good as the first film.
Would I watch this again ? No, it's too glib and lacks cohesion.
Yet, I have watched the first film several times and I will watch it again.
Very dissappointed and I felt this was a missed opportunity.
Not worth a full price cinema ticket.
The Accountant 2 had the potential to build on the strong foundation laid by its predecessor - a serious, well-crafted action thriller with genuine emotional stakes. Instead, it sadly veers into self-parody. What was once a grounded character study wrapped in a taut narrative is now reduced to a series of exaggerated callbacks and hollow action beats.
Rather than deepening the complexity of its central character, the sequel leans into caricature, treating its own mythology with a wink rather than with the conviction that made the original resonate. It's disappointing to see a film that once took itself - and its audience - seriously lose its focus in favor of easy spectacle. I was hopeful for a thoughtful continuation; what we got instead feels like a reflection of its former self, more imitation than evolution.
Rather than deepening the complexity of its central character, the sequel leans into caricature, treating its own mythology with a wink rather than with the conviction that made the original resonate. It's disappointing to see a film that once took itself - and its audience - seriously lose its focus in favor of easy spectacle. I was hopeful for a thoughtful continuation; what we got instead feels like a reflection of its former self, more imitation than evolution.
The Accountant 2 doubles down on the action and humor over the first film. It does however try to juggle too many subplots that are poorly connected, leading to a less coherent film and a lack of a singular, hateable villain.
On the plus side, making Jon Bernthal a co-lead this time was incredibly smart. He and Affleck have great chemistry and Bernthal's Braxton is both a lethal threat and downright hilarious. This is easily his best role since The Punisher.
Like the first film, action isn't the primary focus, with a lot of time spent on enjoyable character moments. But when the action does arrive, it really delivers. Depending on what the new Mission: Impossible has in store for us, the Juarez shootout in this film may go down as the best action sequence of the year.
Again, I wish more of the character development had been focused on the villains, so we'd have a central antagonist who seems like a real threat. Instead we get several boring micro-villains.
I also wish the writing and editing were working in better harmony to bring us a more coherent story.
But all that said, Affleck and Bernthal have charm to spare, the final act is awesome, and this is a decent follow up to the admittedly better first film. 7/10.
On the plus side, making Jon Bernthal a co-lead this time was incredibly smart. He and Affleck have great chemistry and Bernthal's Braxton is both a lethal threat and downright hilarious. This is easily his best role since The Punisher.
Like the first film, action isn't the primary focus, with a lot of time spent on enjoyable character moments. But when the action does arrive, it really delivers. Depending on what the new Mission: Impossible has in store for us, the Juarez shootout in this film may go down as the best action sequence of the year.
Again, I wish more of the character development had been focused on the villains, so we'd have a central antagonist who seems like a real threat. Instead we get several boring micro-villains.
I also wish the writing and editing were working in better harmony to bring us a more coherent story.
But all that said, Affleck and Bernthal have charm to spare, the final act is awesome, and this is a decent follow up to the admittedly better first film. 7/10.
I really like The Accountant. It dared to change the action movie lead role with an autistic character, providing a very interesting role. How would the combination of strengths and weaknesses that The Accountant's condition play out in the dangerous world of international criminals and hitmen?
It was this combination of obsessive/compulsive need for order and completion, combined with an inability to empathise or understand social interactions, that made Affleck's character, Christian Wolff, so interesting.
In the sequel, the writing is not as focused on Affleck in the same way. Instead the focus is on the relationship between him and his brother (Bernthal). While well acted, this simply does not have the same appeal. The movie shines when Wolff's neurodivergence is front and centre, but otherwise it feels like any other generic action-thriller (albeit a well-done one).
It was this combination of obsessive/compulsive need for order and completion, combined with an inability to empathise or understand social interactions, that made Affleck's character, Christian Wolff, so interesting.
In the sequel, the writing is not as focused on Affleck in the same way. Instead the focus is on the relationship between him and his brother (Bernthal). While well acted, this simply does not have the same appeal. The movie shines when Wolff's neurodivergence is front and centre, but otherwise it feels like any other generic action-thriller (albeit a well-done one).
Tonally extremely different to the original movie as they aim to increase the comedic moments. Very weak plot which seemed to rely on paper thin character links.
Terrible oversights with character continuity for the actual accountant. He sounded and looked different - his wardrobe was actually that of Forrest Gump and they even mentioned that as a reference at one point. He doesn't seem to be working in the same way now, and just messing about with dating algorithms for laughs now?! Even if you buy into him making 9 years of effort to integrate, it just seemed too different and ultimately fans of the first movie are coming back for more of the same so development must be within some bounds, otherwise he is just a different character.
I was really upset that they turned his "Solomon Grundy" stim/soothe into a joke and then had him use it in absolutely the wrong moment - more like a punch/tag line. His father's routine over overstimulation that dominated the original to help him cope with the world was completely absent - nothing really seemed to trigger him this time at all.
Would go so far as to say that Jon Bernthal was absolutely wasted and his character was made to look like an idiot rather than a dangerous and whimsical guy.
Agent Medina was a bit of an afterthought who got in the way. Little character development and it seemed like she was just there to remind us all how "off book" the accountant and his brother are.
Honestly this was a terrible follow up to the first movie and we came home and immediately put on the original to try and wash away the mess that was this sequel. It was such an opportunity to really do something cool with the concept, and it was absolutely wasted.
Terrible oversights with character continuity for the actual accountant. He sounded and looked different - his wardrobe was actually that of Forrest Gump and they even mentioned that as a reference at one point. He doesn't seem to be working in the same way now, and just messing about with dating algorithms for laughs now?! Even if you buy into him making 9 years of effort to integrate, it just seemed too different and ultimately fans of the first movie are coming back for more of the same so development must be within some bounds, otherwise he is just a different character.
I was really upset that they turned his "Solomon Grundy" stim/soothe into a joke and then had him use it in absolutely the wrong moment - more like a punch/tag line. His father's routine over overstimulation that dominated the original to help him cope with the world was completely absent - nothing really seemed to trigger him this time at all.
Would go so far as to say that Jon Bernthal was absolutely wasted and his character was made to look like an idiot rather than a dangerous and whimsical guy.
Agent Medina was a bit of an afterthought who got in the way. Little character development and it seemed like she was just there to remind us all how "off book" the accountant and his brother are.
Honestly this was a terrible follow up to the first movie and we came home and immediately put on the original to try and wash away the mess that was this sequel. It was such an opportunity to really do something cool with the concept, and it was absolutely wasted.
How Well Do Ben and Jon Know Each Other?
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe story Braxton tells the woman in Germany about Terry the Dog and the Munchkins is actually true: the terrier got paid more than double what the little people received.
- GaffesDuring the opening scene, the same extra (a dark-haired woman in a light shirt) flees the tavern twice in different shots.
- Citations
Christian Wolff: The fall didn't kill him. It was the abrupt stop.
- ConnexionsFollows Mr Wolff (2016)
- Bandes originalesSee-Line Woman
Written by George Bass and Nina Simone
Performed by Danielle Ponder and Bryce Dessner
Produced by Bryce Dessner
Courtesy of Saddest Factory Records
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Accountant 2?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- El contador 2
- Lieux de tournage
- Cowboy Palace Saloon - 21635 Devonshire St, Chatsworth, Los Angeles, Californie, États-Unis(Honky Tonk bar scene.)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 80 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 65 523 366 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 24 533 959 $US
- 27 avr. 2025
- Montant brut mondial
- 102 123 366 $US
- Durée2 heures 12 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant