Les cigognes sont passées de la livraison de bébés à celle de colis. Mais lorsqu'une commande d'un bébé est passée, la meilleure cigogne de livraison doit se démener pour corriger l'erreur e... Tout lireLes cigognes sont passées de la livraison de bébés à celle de colis. Mais lorsqu'une commande d'un bébé est passée, la meilleure cigogne de livraison doit se démener pour corriger l'erreur en livrant le bébé.Les cigognes sont passées de la livraison de bébés à celle de colis. Mais lorsqu'une commande d'un bébé est passée, la meilleure cigogne de livraison doit se démener pour corriger l'erreur en livrant le bébé.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 5 victoires et 4 nominations au total
- Junior
- (voix)
- Tulip
- (voix)
- Hunter
- (voix)
- Henry Gardner
- (voix)
- Beta Wolf
- (voix)
- Jasper
- (voix)
- Dougland
- (voix)
- (as Chris Smith)
Avis à la une
You would also be enjoying the very colorful scenes and the funny moments during the chase by the wolves. Those were some of the most enjoyable moments. But the moment that I laughed the hardest was during the scene involving penguins (and the fork). It was priceless!
I also loved that the trailer shown many times in the theaters was only showing some brief introduction about Storks and baby making machine. This helped us to be enjoying the movie without knowing there were so many plots inside this one. For parents who want to bring their children to watch this, I believe they would be able to enjoy it. For teenagers & adults, this movie would also be enjoyable to watch. However, please do not expect logic or the making sense of the story of Storks delivering babies. If you can only enjoy movie when logic is very much a great factor, then I do not think this movie is right for you. If you are looking for some fun and good laughter, then you can definitely watch this one!
By the way, this movie was produced by Warner Bros Animation Group (WAG) which also produced The Lego Movie. Hence, it was not a surprise to see there was a short funny animated Lego movie of a Chinese Kung Fu Master and a chicken before the start of the movie. I guess WAG also wanted to follow the success of such pattern used by Disney, Pixar and even Illuminati (remember those cute minions in The Secret Life of Pets ?). It did give us a nice thing to enjoy before the start of the actual movie. So when you already bought the tickets for this film, please make sure you are not late to be able to watch this short fun movie.
please read my full review in michaelnontonmulu.blogspot.co.id
I admit that the story makes little sense. How exactly are babies brought into this world now? We briefly get to see the process of how a baby is made. I love how big and epic this movie gets. Yes, it's technically short, but it still gives you everything you would want in a good movie. They have a lot of great details and it leads up to an exciting climax. As a huge fan of "The Lego Movie", you have to watch the great short that precedes this. If only "Looney Tunes" did stuff like that nowadays. It's great to see a good movie based on an original concept too. ***
There's definitely moments in this movie that resonated deeply with me and I'm sure it did with other parents as well especially the interaction between the stork and Tulip when the baby is up all night.
I could have gone without the Trump haired bird character completely and I think representation of different families other families such as LGBT+ And people with different body types Would have been nice at the end during the quick shots.
Overall I really enjoyed and the main young character other than the baby is a bit mature for his age but the reasons are valid and I think many kids in his situation would relate to this as well. I grew up with three older sister and still could relate to that feeling.
People rate kids movies too harshly. Tbh kids really can't relate to what's on the screen for quite some time and even when they do start reaching an age where they can start grasping that information (three) they loose interests very quickly because their attentions spans are much shorter than ours. There are definitely lots of movies that are hot stinkers but this one is very cute and my daughter and I will be watching it again soon.
And that's what STORKS delivers better than babies or packages: entertainment.
You might have noticed people commenting on how forced and thin the storyline is and how uneven it feels, and those complaints are accurate. The plot is extremely thin (virtually an extended sitcom-sized premise stretched into an epic road-trip format), and the story moves so quickly that it goes too far too fast with nary any breathing room to savor the experience or give the characters the tension or time to build any real catharsis or change. But the characters are so authentic to themselves that you know just about everything you need to know about them from their first scenes.
I think the main reason STORKS gets such middling reviews in print and here on IMDb is because it's an old-fashioned type of comedy: a screwball-slapstick hybrid. The emphasis on sight gags, pain-humor, and wackiness has generally been avoided in animated films as passe and vulgar--low comedy. The rapid-fire snark between the main characters of Tulip and Junior hearken back to the old Howard Hawks workplace comedies of the 1930s, which is definitely an acquired taste in the post-narrative style of humor found in kids entertainment today--where non-sequiturs and punchlines exist in a vacuum and visual comedy is derived from abstraction rather than plasticity. But the comedic energy and the variety of jokes from modern "Office"-style cringe (Pigeon Toady) to the machine-gun-speed HIS GIRL FRIDAYy-style verbal sparring (Tulip & Junior), absurdism (the wolves), post-modern meta-humor (the boy and his parents) to classical WB slapstick of yesteryear, and the film is riotously funny because of it. At the end of the day, that's what STORKS wants to be: FUNNY.
STORKS is not a great film. It's not a masterpiece like TOY STORY or UP. It won't win any Oscars and it won't be everyone's cup of tea. But there's an excellent chance that it will live on as a multi-generational favorite for the same reasons as dumb-fun-with-a-heart-of-gold treasures like SPACEBALLS, DUMB & DUMBER, THE NAKED GUN, and NATIONAL LAMPOONS CHRISTMASs VACATION:
Because you can watch it 1,000 times and it will NEVER stop being funny.
So try it out. There's a 50-50 chance you'll be among the ones who can't stop watching it.
There are many reasons to like "Storks". The animation is super cute, and the story is very sweet. Most people would connect with babies, making this film an easy success. The wolves are funny too. However the broken heart has gone just one step too far as it gets too repetitive and non functional like the other formation of the wolves. I also like the literal downfall of the boss. Adults can relate to that too. It is rare to see a film that can be enjoyed by all ages. I liked it.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAndy Samberg uses the signature "cool...cool cool cool cool cool cool" of his character Jake Peralta in Brooklyn 99.
- GaffesWhile Pigeon Toady is in the tundra, he encounters what appears to be a baboon. While baboons only live in Africa and Saudi Arabia and not the tundra, the animal in the film is actually a Japanese macaque. While technically not a tundra animal, but native of the forest regions of Japan, macaques use natural hot water springs to bath -as shown in the movie- during Japanese freezing winter temperatures and have been nicknamed "snow monkeys".
- Citations
[Junior, Tulip and Diamond get across a bridge and cut it so that the Wolf Pack can't get across]
Junior: Suck it, wolves!
Alpha Wolf: Wolf Pack, form of wolf bridge!
[the wolves start climbing on each other]
Junior: What is happening?
Tulip: The wolves are forming a suspension bridge.
Junior: How is that possible?
Tulip: I don't know.
- Crédits fousPart of the closing credits appears in a montage of baby photos.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Conan: Andy Samberg/Portia Doubleday/St. Paul & the Broken Bones (2016)
- Bandes originalesGood Day
Written by Justin Tranter, Robin Fredriksson (as Robin Lennart Fredriksson), Mattias Larsson (as Mattias Per Larsson) and Joe Jonas
Performed by DNCE
Courtesy of Republic Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Storks?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Cigüeñas: La historia que no te contaron
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 70 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 72 800 603 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 21 311 407 $US
- 25 sept. 2016
- Montant brut mondial
- 183 800 603 $US
- Durée1 heure 27 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
- 2.39 : 1