Monday at 11:01 A.M.

This movie could have been decent. The story line held our attention. The filming quality was not bad at all. However, I just could not get over the lead character acting.. Instead of casting himself in the lead role, the writer should have found another to take his place.....anyone.

I could see this script being picked up for a remake someday. It's certainly not a great film. But, it has potential. I didn't see this as your typical B-movie overall. It's just that the lead performance was far below the quality of the rest of the film IMO.

I can only imagine what the other actors thought of the film when watching it. What a shame.

I've seen bad movies and I've seen stupid movies, but this movie combines them both into one with the end result being a movie that just plain sucks! Terrible story line and even worse acting by half of the cast. I've never left a review but found this movie so stupid that I hoped to save someone 1.5 hours of their life.

Waste of time. The writer/lead actor "Charles Agron" should literally never make another movie again.

Monday, Monday, can't trust that day Monday, Monday, sometimes it just turns out that way Oh Monday mornin' you gave me no warnin' of what was to be On Monday, Monday, how could you leave and not take me

It is "Monday at 11:01 A. M." Charles and Lauren are on a road trip for a special occasion. They go through a tunnel to a town that attracts them. They plan to stay the night.

Soon strange things begin to happen and nothing adds up; is Charles going crazy or does it seem that some people know him for some reason?

The story is familiar and the tale has been told several times before. "Welcome to the Hotel California." - Eagles

There is no real mystery. The value of watching this movie is to see how it is executed. Do the actors do a good job and seem real? Does the plot twist enough so you will want to catch the details?

I found it fun to watch but nothing exceptional.

The movie has a decent premise with elements of mystery, thriller, and supernatural flick thrown in. The scripting was somewhat stilted and awkward, but could have been worse. It jumps around a lot and gets a little silly, but it ties everything together nicely and gives you a nice, though predictable, twist. The filming was good.

But the lead actor was absolutely the worst. His tone was completely flat. He sounded exactly the same throughout the entire movie. Confusion, anger, love - every emotion was portrayed with the exact same tone and intonation. And who talks like this guy? I get that in written form it may have seemed fine, but the language was totally unnatural. People don't say "they are". They say "they're". How did nobody notice how labored his speech sounded? Is that how he talks in real life, or just when he's trying to act? Most of the other acting was okay (although none of it was particularly memorable), but the lead drove me nuts and made the movie totally unenjoyable.

I watched it in bits and pieces while doing midnight feedings with my newborn. I don't know that I would have been able to handle it beginning to end in one sitting. I'd say it's fine if you have a couple hours to kill, but I wouldn't go out of my way to watch it.