ÉVALUATION IMDb
4,9/10
13 k
MA NOTE
Le quotidien minutieusement construit dans le cadre des privilèges d'une femme noire est bouleversé lorsque deux étrangers débarquent dans sa paisible banlieue.Le quotidien minutieusement construit dans le cadre des privilèges d'une femme noire est bouleversé lorsque deux étrangers débarquent dans sa paisible banlieue.Le quotidien minutieusement construit dans le cadre des privilèges d'une femme noire est bouleversé lorsque deux étrangers débarquent dans sa paisible banlieue.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Prix
- 1 victoire au total
Samuel Paul Small
- Sebastian
- (as Samuel Small)
Avis en vedette
I'll start off by saying that reading through the reviews *before* watching the movie will almost definitely influence your opinion of the movie even while watching it. The movie is by no means a perfect one. But it has good moments, keeps you interested, has a surprise ending (some might not like that). The plot holes are glaring and I can see why people can be mad at that. But they are not something many people who watch with a suspension of belief, will be bothered by. The pacing is quite good, quality is good and acting is good. Storyline itself has its ups and downs like the movie itself.
I think the confusion about this flick is that it's actually supposed to be the way it is.
I experienced a weird feeling watching it.
The main character is so constantly flustered by by her own perceptions of what should be versus what isn't versus internal guilt and manifested external rage...that it's actually remarkably crafty how indiscreet the acting is. If this makes sense.
That being said, I don't think it quiets get there and there are some farcical extended moments of doldrum that keep it from being a really good film.
I watched it to the end to see what happens and there is closure, so in my books the story was told. It is sort of creepy, more a thriller than anything else.
I experienced a weird feeling watching it.
The main character is so constantly flustered by by her own perceptions of what should be versus what isn't versus internal guilt and manifested external rage...that it's actually remarkably crafty how indiscreet the acting is. If this makes sense.
That being said, I don't think it quiets get there and there are some farcical extended moments of doldrum that keep it from being a really good film.
I watched it to the end to see what happens and there is closure, so in my books the story was told. It is sort of creepy, more a thriller than anything else.
This movie starts off with 35 minutes of pointlessness. A well off housewife stressed out and concerned. That's act 1. I don't want to write spoilers here so I'll just tell you it doesn't get better, it gets worse and worse and worse.
The plot holes are massive. I mean you would have to suspend all reality of society to believe some of the things that occur to set up the "story" or "plot" or whatever this thing is.
The "plot" is allegorical and so basic. Why do films like this even get made? How do scripts like this get financed? Black mail? I don't get it. Even the acting isn't great.
There are other parts where you will just shake your head and ask: Why. That's the main question. This is utter nonsense. Unless you're into watching a plot that moves in ways that confuse you and make you annoyed, I would avoid this movie. Not good. 3/10.
The plot holes are massive. I mean you would have to suspend all reality of society to believe some of the things that occur to set up the "story" or "plot" or whatever this thing is.
The "plot" is allegorical and so basic. Why do films like this even get made? How do scripts like this get financed? Black mail? I don't get it. Even the acting isn't great.
There are other parts where you will just shake your head and ask: Why. That's the main question. This is utter nonsense. Unless you're into watching a plot that moves in ways that confuse you and make you annoyed, I would avoid this movie. Not good. 3/10.
It is one of those movies that leaves you confused, like a David Lynch film. It was disturbing in many ways and what a lot of people criticised as bad acting was, for me, intentional. Neve's reactions are purposely out of touch with reality and a lot is left for the viewer to guess, again, on purpose, as it all adds to the uncomfortable feeling the viewer is meant to feel. It is a psychological drama and in that respect has achieved its goal. I found it to be very disturbing to watch, because it touches on certain subjects that are real and frightening. It was everything but boring and I think that those who perceived it as such have misunderstood the feelings it was meant to convey.
I watched it out of curiosity because my dad left when I was young and never tried to contact me. After I had a son I wondered what would drive a parent to just disappear. Really cold. I would move mountains to see my son. I would move to differant countries just to be near him. Anyway, back on track...I never felt the way these kids did. I just never gave my dad a thought. A lot of complaints have been made about the ending but I could not have thought of a better one. I took two seconds, waited for the movie to resume, then burst out laughing. As comical as it was, it was so ironic that the ending itself deserves 10 stars. Though the movie is slightly predictable, it was worth the watch just to see the ending.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDirectorial and Screenwriter debut of Nathaniel Martello-White.
- GaffesAt 2:39 Cheryl writes a note and puts it on the fridge door. When it flashes back to the note on the fridge at 3:43 the way the message is written and the color of the paper look different and the race car magnet is in a different spot.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Strays?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Durée1 heure 40 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant