La quête brutale de vengeance d'un homme prend des proportions démesurées alors que son passé d'agent secret d'une puissante organisation clandestine connue sous le nom des Apiculteurs est r... Tout lireLa quête brutale de vengeance d'un homme prend des proportions démesurées alors que son passé d'agent secret d'une puissante organisation clandestine connue sous le nom des Apiculteurs est révélé.La quête brutale de vengeance d'un homme prend des proportions démesurées alors que son passé d'agent secret d'une puissante organisation clandestine connue sous le nom des Apiculteurs est révélé.
- Prix
- 1 victoire et 6 nominations au total
Sommaire
Reviewers say 'The Beekeeper' is an action-packed film with Jason Statham's intense performance. Themes of revenge, corporate greed, and online scams are prominent. Critics praise Statham and the action sequences but criticize the lack of originality, predictable plot, and bee metaphors. Some appreciate the social commentary, while others find the script and supporting cast lacking. The film is entertaining but not groundbreaking, with mixed opinions on its quality.
Avis en vedette
Statham 8/10
Action 8/10.
Story 6/10 Agent Parker 1/10
The action and the story are great. Statham is fantastic.
Unfortunately, after that the other actors are bad or worse. Agent Parker was horrendous, shocking that she was even cast. If you can put her acting aside, then it's a pretty solid and enjoyable movie.
The Beekeeper is worth checking out if you enjoy action and Jason Statham. The movie is comparable to some of his better movies: transporter, the mechanic, crank, expendables. Again, for what it is and putting the bad supporting actors aside then it is enjoyable. Enjoy the action!
Story 6/10 Agent Parker 1/10
The action and the story are great. Statham is fantastic.
Unfortunately, after that the other actors are bad or worse. Agent Parker was horrendous, shocking that she was even cast. If you can put her acting aside, then it's a pretty solid and enjoyable movie.
The Beekeeper is worth checking out if you enjoy action and Jason Statham. The movie is comparable to some of his better movies: transporter, the mechanic, crank, expendables. Again, for what it is and putting the bad supporting actors aside then it is enjoyable. Enjoy the action!
A solid popcorn action flick. Jason is his standard typecast role, which you can't blame him for, he's a one trick pony but that one trick is entertaining.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
The whole movie is a budget-bin version of John Wick, which again is ok if you accept it for what it is.
The main down fall is the casting of Emmy Raver-Lampan, who is just a stunningly bad actress. It's impossible to believe her on onscreen, even in a popcorn flick.
Jeremy Irons is a welcome sight and lends credibility to the film, even though he doesn't get much screen time.
Despite this I actually hope there's a sequel, fun action flicks are perfect beer and pizza viewing.
Action flicks aren't known for their plots. That being said, is it possible to finally have at least somewhat plausible plotlines? I mean it's just so... stupid, I can't really .... My almost 80 year old parents know more about computers than these morons in the movies and many more examples of that.
The action is great, as usual in Statham movies. That's why I even considered to write a review. It's everything one might expect from his action flick. As always he is the one who carries the movie throughout, and despite all the stupidity, it actually works. You probably need to be pretty drunk, but when you are, it's actually fun.
So, as a one time entertainment, it's actually worth it.
The action is great, as usual in Statham movies. That's why I even considered to write a review. It's everything one might expect from his action flick. As always he is the one who carries the movie throughout, and despite all the stupidity, it actually works. You probably need to be pretty drunk, but when you are, it's actually fun.
So, as a one time entertainment, it's actually worth it.
- Plot/Script= 5/10
- Cinematography = 7/10
- Acting = 6/10
- Enjoyability = 8/10
- Notes: Imagine the Equalizer but it's Jason Statham as a beekeeper....that's what this movie was. I can't lie it kept me entertained the entire time, the plot was just a bit weird to me. It almost seemed like a mix of comedy and action with some of these scenes being comically hilarious. The movie is exactly what you expect it to be, nothing more nothing less. It seemed liked the writers & director knew how absurd the plot was and embraced it well. If you looking for a straight action movie with some badass scenes then you will like this movie. Not to mention Josh Hutchinson did a great job playing a character which seemed to be almost identically based of the current President's son.
Statham knows how to fight. The action is great.
The dialogs and the plot... oh my God. This was all written by a 15 year old as a weekend project.
It's all beyond ridiculous.
Even Statham's usual delivery can't salvage the "zinger" phrases in this movie. Not even that.
Still, the action is good.
Watch it for the action. With beer. With friends around, making fun of all the silly and teenage-amateurish dialogs.
You'll walk out thinking that you should not have enjoyed this horrible movie, and that you can also be a Hollywood screenwriter. Easily.
By the way, they spent 40 million to do this... I can only imagine Statham walked out of the movie loaded.
The dialogs and the plot... oh my God. This was all written by a 15 year old as a weekend project.
It's all beyond ridiculous.
Even Statham's usual delivery can't salvage the "zinger" phrases in this movie. Not even that.
Still, the action is good.
Watch it for the action. With beer. With friends around, making fun of all the silly and teenage-amateurish dialogs.
You'll walk out thinking that you should not have enjoyed this horrible movie, and that you can also be a Hollywood screenwriter. Easily.
By the way, they spent 40 million to do this... I can only imagine Statham walked out of the movie loaded.
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDue to the tight production budget ($34 million) the majority of the film was shot in the UK to qualify for UK tax relief.
- GaffesAt around 46 minutes, an FBI tactical unit is stopped from proceeding by the leader of the private security company waving a sheet claiming his team are there on the direct orders of the Governor, and tells the FBI tactical team to leave. This is absolutely not true in real life. The FBI is a federal agency and is not under any direct state control by any governor of a state.
- Citations
Agent Verona Parker: I believe you. But there are laws for that.
Adam Clay: There are laws for that. Until they fail. Then they've got me.
- Générique farfeluThe opening titles appear over a montage of footage of bees and historical records of bees.
- Autres versionsGerman TV version is cut by 5 minutes overall to secure a "not under 16" rating. The "not under 18" rated version elsewhere is completely uncensored.
- ConnexionsFeatured in OWV Updates: OWV Cinema Poster Update (16/01/2024) (2024)
- Bandes originalesBreath
Performed by RiLLA*
Written by James Damon Woodford
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Beekeeper?Propulsé par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Beekeeper
- Lieux de tournage
- Kingsferry Bridge, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, Angleterre, Royaume-Uni(elevator bridge scene)
- sociétés de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 40 000 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 66 220 535 $ US
- Fin de semaine d'ouverture – États-Unis et Canada
- 16 576 007 $ US
- 14 janv. 2024
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 162 619 535 $ US
- Durée1 heure 45 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant