City Hall

There's no need to convince Wiseman fans to watch this. All I'll say is that it is one of his best films that I have seen (out of only a tiny fraction of his filmography), and critics who have seen much more of his films seem to agree.

There's also no point trying to convince Wiseman haters to watch this. It's more than 4 and a half hours long, and it's about day-to-day city politics.

If you've never seen a Wiseman, or particularly a late-period Wiseman, a film this long is probably not a good place to start. But if you like being shoved into the deep end of the pool, know beforehand that Wiseman is a documentary filmmaker who does not directly interview subjects or insert any commentary. He points and he shoots as a fly on the wall, often looking behind the scenes at how major institutions function. There will be plenty of boardroom meetings. You will either find his films extremely boring or extremely fascinating. I come out of his films feeling smarter and more educated. They don't tell you what to think, but they provide knowledge about the world that often feels useful and applicable.

City Hall was filmed in late 2018 and early 2019. A lot of the film follows Boston mayor Martin "Mahty" Walsh. I tried to analyze throughout the film why I liked him so much. What I came up with was that he was a workaholic who genuinely loved his job as a mayor - not the power that comes with it, but the actual job. In contrast, I found myself thinking of a fictional mayor, Aiden Gillen's portrayal of Thomas Carcetti from The Wire, who writers and political consultants based on Martin O'Malley--a mayor who craved power and popularity, who wanted to do "good" but hated the grunt work.

The film also watches everyone from city hall telephone operators to road workers. We watch meetings where people discuss solutions for the opioid crisis, homeless services, and how to develop neighborhoods without displacing their original residents. One other big thing I noticed: no one debates whether these things are important or necessary, only the best strategy to solve them. Frank Capra wasn't this idealistic.

Which isn't to say the film is all rainbows and sunshine. We get a very long community meeting about the opening of a dispensary in a poor neighborhood where residents vent their concerns and the developers don't always have answers. Throughout the film, many point out Boston has a reputation as a racist city and it's racial and ethnic conflicts can't be solved overnight. Some meetings are about trying to contain the damage by Trump administration policies, such as changes to the Fair Housing Act of 1968's Desperate Impact Rule, or the emotional fallout of his Muslim bans on Boston's immigrant communities.

This year in particular, City Hall is surreally hopeful. But that is very welcome.

TIFF 2020 14

City Hall

This is Frederick Wiseman's latest documentary which runs about 4 and half hours and revovles around the government of Boston city in Massachusetts. The film explores the city hall building in Boston and tries to provide us with a comprehensive look of how it operates, what activities take form inside and what role it plays in term of running the city.

There are some very interesting shots in this film, notably crushing a couple queen sized mattresses in the garbage truck, a man reporting and discussing a rat infestation problem in his house, some guys trying to negotiate the illegal parking tickets they got charges with and etc. For the most part however, we are seeing and following the city mayor Marty Walsh along with Wiseman's camera as he goes through various sessions of meetings with his deputies, or takes part of City's gatherings and gives motivational speeches.

This is a very long film to watch, probably best to watch in two sittings, but I found all scenes to be interesting so I'm not sure how this could be shorter or what parts should be cut from it.

I was going to write off the film, and then that full queen sized bed and BBQ got crushed.

It is fly on the wall, but that fly really landed on a boring wall. Hours of people talking about how they want to meet people halfway and develop community based solutions to the needs of marginalized communities with consultation and communications based on meeting in a community oriented setting...

There are interesting moments, but it just feels like a marathon. If you work in white collar job this just feels like being dragged into a work meeting with no written agenda.

I'm not really sure who this is for, if you're involved and into municipal government you'll probably stop watching because it feels like the boring bit of the work. If you don't like municipal government then you probably won't enjoy watching government employees edging 4 hours closer to their pension.

If you live in any city, you can access city council meetings and consultations online. I'd just use the 4 hours to learn about some park or bridge or development going on near you. You'll get the gist and you'll come out of it knowing more about your own town.

What a self-indulgent offering. He just let the camera go with no apparent effort at reining in these blowhard politicians. If he could make a point in 2 minutes, he'd let the scenes go on for ten. You think sitting in a meeting where you have an interest in the outcome can be boring? Just wait til you are watching these party hacks sitting around a table and droning on about subjects that really don't interest you. I understand this building is being torn down which I guess was all the reason Wiseman needed to make this documentary. Fine, put it in the archives as a permanent record of its role in the city but don't expect anyone but the participants to want to watch this.

I really enjoyed the way the documentary was filmed. It was an honest, clear portrayal of city governance in Boston. I do hope this documentary inspires people to get more deeply involved in civic life. This documentary demystifies city governance and makes me so proud of the elected officials and public servants here in Boston.