Hijo de la obscuridad

In a small town, Nina (Rosalind Allen), her adopted baby son Tyler and her Danny (Jay Underwood) live in a Bed & Breakfast of their own. Nina's husband left her since Tyler cried all the time driving him crazy. Meanwhile in the town there are several cases of coyote attack with many casualties. When Nina takes Tyler to the hospital, Dr. Max Schreck (Michael Praed) treats him, and Tyler stops crying. Nina also meets Max's impertinent brother Tom (Steve Bond). Soon Max invites Nina to have dinner with him. Meanwhile, Danny meets Cellia (Amanda Wyss) and changes his behavior towards Nina. When the stranger Martin (Scott Jacoby) visits Nina, he tries to explain that vampires moved to the town, but Nina believes he is lunatic. But soon she learns the truth about Tyler and his family.

"Son of Darkness: To Die for II" is an underrated vampire B-movie, with a good storyline. The screenplay is also good, and the conclusion is reasonable. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "O Destino de Tyler" ("The Destiny of Tyler")

Well, during the credit sequence for To Die For 2: Son of Darkness, I noticed that the film at least LOOKED cinematic. That makes it leaps and bounds better than its predecessor. But is it a good movie? Nope. They managed to get pretty much the entire cast of the first film (minus the two leads oddly enough) back in action. And at least there is a bit of action in this installment. It's not just a silly romance. So Drac is back and he's seducing a new chick who might have adopted his son. The "hero" of the series informs us some mysterious explosion was able to bring Dracula back after he turned to ash in the original. And somehow, all the other vampires who were KILLED in the original are all also reincarnated. It never explains that part. I really didn't expect it to. So that didn't bother me as much as it should have. The thing that bothers me is in the first film, the head vamp tells everyone his name is Vlad Tepish and no one blinks an eye. Now he's a doctor (?!?!) going by Max Schreck! Geez, do people in horror movies not watch horror movies? Or are these characters just idiots. I'm going for the latter. The only other new actor, other than the leads, is The Boy Who Could Fly. And yes, he finally gets his head lopped off with a chainsaw. So if you hate those Not Quite Human movies, rent this for a little payback. Otherwise, stay far away.

Now, when we rented this film, we thought it would be a cheesy vampire flick. Well, it wasn't cheesy at all. It was just plain boring. I have no intentions of seeing the first one now. This movie was horrible. I give it credit for being shot well, but the plot was boring. The acting wasn't all that bad. It just makes me wonder why someone would want to make such a boring movie.

This a great horror movie. It is very scary. It has a great story. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. It a Dracula movie and they are very scary most of the time. This is a sequel to Dracula. 3.8 is underrating this movie. This a great movie. It is scarier then the Exorcist. I give it 10 out 10. If you like good horror movies from the 80's you like this movie. This a great movie. It is very scary. Dracula (March 1931) is better. Still this a great movie. It is scary. Dracula (1992) is also better. So Dracula (1979) is also better. Dracula (1958) is also better. Still this a great horror movie. See it. It is one of the best movies ever.

It's a vampire B-flick, not much more. But Michael Praed is so hot in this movie! The perfect vampire :) He's actually the only thing that makes this movie worth a watch.