La violación de una novia y el asesinato de su marido samurái desde el punto de vista de un bandido, de la novia, del fantasma del samurái y de un leñador.La violación de una novia y el asesinato de su marido samurái desde el punto de vista de un bandido, de la novia, del fantasma del samurái y de un leñador.La violación de una novia y el asesinato de su marido samurái desde el punto de vista de un bandido, de la novia, del fantasma del samurái y de un leñador.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Nominado a 1 premio Óscar
- 9 premios ganados y 5 nominaciones en total
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Rashomon' delves into the nature of truth and reality through multiple conflicting perspectives of a crime. Characters like the bandit, wife, samurai, and woodcutter offer varied accounts, showcasing subjective truth and human perception's unreliability. The film challenges viewers to question truth and personal biases' impact on storytelling. Its innovative narrative and cinematography highlight human nature's complexity and the struggle to find objective truth, receiving both acclaim and critique for its profound themes and structure.
Opiniones destacadas
'People forget the unpleasant things. They only remember what they want to remember.'
In Rashomon the editing tells ½ of the story. It may feel experimental or unconventional, but Kurosawa perfects the concept second by second, directing and editing. This film didn't need a big budget to come perfectly to the point. It's a simple tale, but not a superficial tale. Different points of view and selective memories ('It's true! I saw it!') don't only make the woods unsafe, but are one of the most universal topics of humanity. 'We humans are weak creatures. That's why we lie, even to ourselves' says it all actually: it's about what people want to hear and when they start being interested at all, apart from wishful thinking. Selfish excuses vs trust in other people.
Rashomon gets masterful when in one instant there is literally a different point of view: the camera takes another position to shoot the same sequence, thereby forcing the audience to reconsider what they just saw. That is the sort of storytelling that the supposed masters of cinema in our time yet have to equal, or try to copy when they fail. Admitted 'Memento' (2000, Nolan) is a truly great one. Still not THAT universal. 'Pulp Fiction' (1994) didn't come close, 'La Commare Secca' (1962) also didn't. 'Ghost dog: the way of the samurai' (1999) touched another border of the concept, or does it?
The use of (non-original) music in my opinion reveals a certain interest for western influence, not only in Rashomon, but also in Kurosawa's forthcoming films, and is probably why his films were so influential on western filmmakers too.
The cinematography is dynamic and changes scene by scene to emphasize exactly what is going on. The shadows of leaves and branches, captured by cinematographer Kazuo Miyagawa, make you really feel 'in the woods', while the actors (Toshirô Mifune, Takashi Shimura) convince the remaining part of the audience (which adds up to 100% breathless viewers). It may be after days that you first realize you saw an important film. After weeks you realize that you must see it again to comprehend (despite it's only 85 min), and ironically that is just one of the crucial points that Kurosawa made. 10/10
In Rashomon the editing tells ½ of the story. It may feel experimental or unconventional, but Kurosawa perfects the concept second by second, directing and editing. This film didn't need a big budget to come perfectly to the point. It's a simple tale, but not a superficial tale. Different points of view and selective memories ('It's true! I saw it!') don't only make the woods unsafe, but are one of the most universal topics of humanity. 'We humans are weak creatures. That's why we lie, even to ourselves' says it all actually: it's about what people want to hear and when they start being interested at all, apart from wishful thinking. Selfish excuses vs trust in other people.
Rashomon gets masterful when in one instant there is literally a different point of view: the camera takes another position to shoot the same sequence, thereby forcing the audience to reconsider what they just saw. That is the sort of storytelling that the supposed masters of cinema in our time yet have to equal, or try to copy when they fail. Admitted 'Memento' (2000, Nolan) is a truly great one. Still not THAT universal. 'Pulp Fiction' (1994) didn't come close, 'La Commare Secca' (1962) also didn't. 'Ghost dog: the way of the samurai' (1999) touched another border of the concept, or does it?
The use of (non-original) music in my opinion reveals a certain interest for western influence, not only in Rashomon, but also in Kurosawa's forthcoming films, and is probably why his films were so influential on western filmmakers too.
The cinematography is dynamic and changes scene by scene to emphasize exactly what is going on. The shadows of leaves and branches, captured by cinematographer Kazuo Miyagawa, make you really feel 'in the woods', while the actors (Toshirô Mifune, Takashi Shimura) convince the remaining part of the audience (which adds up to 100% breathless viewers). It may be after days that you first realize you saw an important film. After weeks you realize that you must see it again to comprehend (despite it's only 85 min), and ironically that is just one of the crucial points that Kurosawa made. 10/10
This was Kurosawa's first big international hit, from then on his films would be avidly watched and (usually) feted as Art. His style was always so breathtakingly simple that you can't help but get sucked into the rainy and sunny bestial world depicted in here, with a beautiful use of the black and white nitrate film stock contrasting against a sordid storyline. I've probably seen it 10 times now over the decades and it seems to get better every time I settle down to it - it's been a continual treat.
A horror story from a few days previous is recounted on a ferociously wet day: beautiful woman is (apparently) raped by animalistic bandit in front of her husband who is then (apparently) murdered. But who really did what to who and why? It's told from four viewpoints: the bandit's, the honourable woman's, the heroic dead husband's via a rather startling medium and lastly a breathless version from a timid eye-witness. The event becomes a crime scene with the beauty of forest surrounding us and splintered sunlight beaming down on us through the trees bearing mute witness to the savage few moments. It's a salutary lesson in Human Beings vs Objectivity; the psychologies of the main protagonists are laid bare, as well as the story-tellers, even to Kurosawa and the viewers themselves. Who's telling the truth/ was it a mixture of all versions/ was there another truth untold? Only you can decide!
I urge all innocent bystanders who have a problem with b&w non-HD 4:3 subtitled Japanese films from 1950 to try to get over it! Because it's a riveting journey, expertly handled by probably the best film director who's ever lived, all subjective of course.
A horror story from a few days previous is recounted on a ferociously wet day: beautiful woman is (apparently) raped by animalistic bandit in front of her husband who is then (apparently) murdered. But who really did what to who and why? It's told from four viewpoints: the bandit's, the honourable woman's, the heroic dead husband's via a rather startling medium and lastly a breathless version from a timid eye-witness. The event becomes a crime scene with the beauty of forest surrounding us and splintered sunlight beaming down on us through the trees bearing mute witness to the savage few moments. It's a salutary lesson in Human Beings vs Objectivity; the psychologies of the main protagonists are laid bare, as well as the story-tellers, even to Kurosawa and the viewers themselves. Who's telling the truth/ was it a mixture of all versions/ was there another truth untold? Only you can decide!
I urge all innocent bystanders who have a problem with b&w non-HD 4:3 subtitled Japanese films from 1950 to try to get over it! Because it's a riveting journey, expertly handled by probably the best film director who's ever lived, all subjective of course.
"Rashomon" was Akira Kurosawa's first national hit (becoming, at the time, the highest-grossing foreign film in America) and even gained an Oscar for Best Foreign Film, but almost sixty years later it still hasn't lost any of its impact. It is widely revered as one of the most influential films of all-time, but unlike some other movies, it is not a film that feels dated. The revolutionary methods of Kurosawa are still effective and on-par with the cinema of today -- this isn't a movie where you say, "Yeah, fifty years ago it might have been different, but now it's done in all the movies." Kurosawa's techniques are still superior to most of his imitators. Look at the 2003 John McTiernan film, "Basic," which copies a good portion of "Rashomon's" concept. Which is the better film? It's not a hard choice.
The film begins under a structure which reads "Rashomon" on its exterior, in a small Japanese village. It's raining outside and a woodcutter (Takashi Shumura) and a priest (Minoru Chiaki) inadvertently find themselves in the company of a wandering commoner (Kichijiro Ueda), and as he asks them what is the matter they both begin to relay the most horrific story they claim to know -- of a brutal murder a few days prior.
Kurosawa then switches to flashback and we see three different versions of the exact same event -- the slaying of an innocent man (the murderer played by Kurosawa film regular Toshirô Mifune) in the woods outside the village. Was it because of lust? Betrayal? Envy? Or insanity? We hear from the murderer, the wife of the victim, and a woman channeling the spirit of the dead man.
"Rashomon" is brilliant. Some people have complained that the ending is a cop-out and sentimental hogwash, but I think Kurosawa was fond of sentimentality to a point (he uses a good deal of it in "Ikiru") but the difference between what he does with sentimentality as opposed to many filmmakers of today is that he uses to to ENRICH the story, not provide an easy solution to all the problems.
Is there resolution in the finale of "Rashomon"? To a degree. But, like "Ikiru," it also leaves an open answer to its audience -- this film questions us, and our humanity, and it says something about the human condition and our weaknesses as a species. Yet it also proposes that along with the evil is an inherent good, and in my opinion the message of "Rashomon" is just as important and effective as its film-making techniques and acting.
The film begins under a structure which reads "Rashomon" on its exterior, in a small Japanese village. It's raining outside and a woodcutter (Takashi Shumura) and a priest (Minoru Chiaki) inadvertently find themselves in the company of a wandering commoner (Kichijiro Ueda), and as he asks them what is the matter they both begin to relay the most horrific story they claim to know -- of a brutal murder a few days prior.
Kurosawa then switches to flashback and we see three different versions of the exact same event -- the slaying of an innocent man (the murderer played by Kurosawa film regular Toshirô Mifune) in the woods outside the village. Was it because of lust? Betrayal? Envy? Or insanity? We hear from the murderer, the wife of the victim, and a woman channeling the spirit of the dead man.
"Rashomon" is brilliant. Some people have complained that the ending is a cop-out and sentimental hogwash, but I think Kurosawa was fond of sentimentality to a point (he uses a good deal of it in "Ikiru") but the difference between what he does with sentimentality as opposed to many filmmakers of today is that he uses to to ENRICH the story, not provide an easy solution to all the problems.
Is there resolution in the finale of "Rashomon"? To a degree. But, like "Ikiru," it also leaves an open answer to its audience -- this film questions us, and our humanity, and it says something about the human condition and our weaknesses as a species. Yet it also proposes that along with the evil is an inherent good, and in my opinion the message of "Rashomon" is just as important and effective as its film-making techniques and acting.
Creative narrative idea but didn't enjoy it at all. At the end i get the whole picture.. and how every single witness chose to tell the story focusing on his own pride m.. everyone is selfish and truth is portrayed differently according to "self interest"
The structure of the narrative/story is so unique and deep. But unfortunately i didn't enjoy it at all.
The acting was so silly, the duels were sillier and the pacing was slow!
It was very slow paced with shots that take minutes with just staring and nothingness.
The idea is unique yes, but to have to watch the same setting over and over again with subpar dialogue and plot is unbearable for me! Very tedious
Even though i like Mifune a lot, it's just frustrating watching him this time. The laughter and being silly all of that didn't feel it in this movie. Especially being a bandit and "killer". Very silly! Just the wild facial expressions, and exaggerated laughter. Also his strange body movements felt theatrical and unrealistic.
All characters felt unreal to be honest! Really felt detached to all of them especially with the unrealistic emotions from everybody.
Also, the ending.. Why make me suffer watching the perspective of 4 people of the same crime and not giving me an answer or a proper ending.. the ending shifted the focus from the trial (which we watched endlessly the whole movie) to the 3 other guys and the baby!!
Zero effect on my soul/emotions.
It's a short movie about 88 minutes but the slow pacing and the repetitive structure made it feel like 4 hours.
Didn't enjoy it.. I like the idea tho.
The structure of the narrative/story is so unique and deep. But unfortunately i didn't enjoy it at all.
The acting was so silly, the duels were sillier and the pacing was slow!
It was very slow paced with shots that take minutes with just staring and nothingness.
The idea is unique yes, but to have to watch the same setting over and over again with subpar dialogue and plot is unbearable for me! Very tedious
Even though i like Mifune a lot, it's just frustrating watching him this time. The laughter and being silly all of that didn't feel it in this movie. Especially being a bandit and "killer". Very silly! Just the wild facial expressions, and exaggerated laughter. Also his strange body movements felt theatrical and unrealistic.
All characters felt unreal to be honest! Really felt detached to all of them especially with the unrealistic emotions from everybody.
Also, the ending.. Why make me suffer watching the perspective of 4 people of the same crime and not giving me an answer or a proper ending.. the ending shifted the focus from the trial (which we watched endlessly the whole movie) to the 3 other guys and the baby!!
Zero effect on my soul/emotions.
It's a short movie about 88 minutes but the slow pacing and the repetitive structure made it feel like 4 hours.
Didn't enjoy it.. I like the idea tho.
Rashomon by Akira is probably one of his very best, from his storytelling to the visuals, the picture is amazing.
The film is about about the truth, and burying it because no one can handle it. People prefer to live a lie than admit the truth, very reminiscent of today's world. The characters are talking to us, we are the jury.
The performances are amazing, nothing acting is so good, blows away today's competition.
The film score is stunning as well, one of my favourites from a Japanese film.
The direction is breathtaking, the jungle is beautifully lit, it has a sense of horror to it. Black and white was the perfect choice.
Overall, an amazing film from a genius!
The film is about about the truth, and burying it because no one can handle it. People prefer to live a lie than admit the truth, very reminiscent of today's world. The characters are talking to us, we are the jury.
The performances are amazing, nothing acting is so good, blows away today's competition.
The film score is stunning as well, one of my favourites from a Japanese film.
The direction is breathtaking, the jungle is beautifully lit, it has a sense of horror to it. Black and white was the perfect choice.
Overall, an amazing film from a genius!
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaOften credited as the reason the Academy created the "Best Foreign Film" category.
- ErroresAt the beginning of the film when the woodcutter finds the dead body, the arms and hands are stiff and raised. However; you can see both arms slightly moving. Apparently, they used a real person, and the actor playing the dead person was unable to keep the arms perfectly still.
- Versiones alternativasCriterion Collection releases of this film feature an English Dubbed Version in addition to the traditional, original Japanese version. This is unusual in that Criterion are usually film purists that do not put English language dubs on their discs that contain a foreign language film.
- ConexionesEdited into Papillon d'amour (2004)
- Bandas sonorasWoman's Tale Theme (Bolero)
Written by Fumio Hayasaka inspired by Maurice Ravel's "Bolero", using the same background rhythm, and similar orchestration and build-up, but different melodic lines.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Rashomon?Con tecnología de Alexa
- A NOTE REGARDING SPOILERS
- What is a "Rashômon"?
- Is Rashomon based on two stories?
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 250,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 46,808
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 15,942
- 28 jul 2002
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 139,819
- Tiempo de ejecución1 hora 28 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the streaming release date of Rashomon (1950) in Canada?
Responda