Lilo y Stitch

If you are expecting a carbon copy of the animated version, you will be disappointed. The story has been changed, characters removed, not many laughs and too much focus on the human characters.

Stitch had some cute moments but they were few and far between.

The key introduction to a new neighbour was an added touch but I do feel that this was needed as the film did drag on. At 1 hour 45 mins, this could easily have been reduced to a 90 min movie.

This could have been so much better and this had high potential but sadly fails.

Was an okay watch for a rainy day but wouldn't rush to watch again.

The girl who played Lilo was a great fit to play the mischievous lilo. They put lots of Elvis music and traditional Hawaiian music in it which I enjoyed. The aliens and stitch were funny. The Hawaiian scenery was beautiful.

Cons - They did nani dirty. She's too mean and dismissive to David and lilo. She doesn't even take lilo to get stitch which was a pretty important scene. They are side characters that don't add anything positive to the movie that get too much screen time. Gantu the shark was not in the movie .They should have got terry crews or the rock to play Cobra bubbles. The guy they had just stood there looking constipated and scowled.

I laughed a lot I got a break from life for a while and I got to wear my stitch shirt. The bus full of happy kids and the two older couples with their stitch bucket cups seem to be having a great time.

Disney strikes again with yet another pointless live-action remake with LILO&STITCH. The original came out back in 2002. That movie had edge, great music, a unique animation style, and an emotional story with great themes family and belonging. The remake has... some of those. The story is mostly the same. Lilo (Maia Kealoha) is a young rambunctious kid who is coping with the loss of her parents alongside her teenage sister Nani (Sydney Elizebeth Agudong), who's trying her best to keep guardianship of Lilo. With the threat of social worker Mrs. Kekoa (Tia Carrere) potentially taking Lilo away, the weight of the world is on her shoulders. Meanwhile, an alien creature who was designed to be an agent of chaos and destruction, escapes and crash-lands nearby. Lilo, desperate for a friend, adopts him and gives him the name Stitch (Chris Sanders). I really enjoyed this movie, until I rewatched the original. They mimic most of the best parts, but it's what they changed that annoys me. With the characters, they completely cut one, which change another one, then they added 2 that took away from some of the other character moments that I needed from the original. The added ones should've been cameos that aren't involved in the plot. If you see both movies, you'll know what I'm talking about. This movie feels even safer than the original. Lilo is less of a menace to society. Nani is less connected with her sister, which weakens the core of the whole story. It's so difficult to not compare, but if you haven't seen the original, you'll probably really enjoy this. The theme is still present, but not as vibrant or emotional, especially with how it ends. Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind, or forgotten. This theme may have been left behind just a little bit. This might be one of the best Disney live-action remakes, but the bar is so incredibly low. This might be a harsh take, but I'm just tired of my childhood being ruined. If you have kids, I still recommend LILO&STITCH, but stick with the animated version. Let's send a message to Disney. Remember, no matter how good these remakes are, they'll never be as good as the original animated classics. It still makes me wonder why Disney is still doing them, besides being a cash-grab. Why don't they just re-release the originals back into theaters?

Let's start with this: the original 'Lilo & Stitch' is one of my favourite cartoons ever. It's pure magic - quirky, heartfelt, and beautifully weird in that way only early 2000s Disney could get away with. So when I heard there was a live-action remake in the works, I had cautious hope. But after sitting through this 2025 adaptation... I wish I'd never seen it.

This remake is not nearly as good as the original. In fact, it barely feels like it's trying to be. Iconic moments have been cut or warped beyond recognition - smoothed over into something bland and safe. And don't get me started on Stitch himself - still voiced by Chris Sanders, yes, but it feels hollow without the wild energy that made him so lovable.

Some of the changes just make no sense. Characters are tweaked in ways that add nothing, and the emotional heart of the story - Lilo's grief, her loneliness, her oddball charm - has been neutered. The film is both rushed AND drags on, somehow managing to feel overstuffed and undercooked all at once. A true feat, if it wasn't so frustrating to watch.

Ultimately, it feels like a soulless cash grab. Another in a long line of Disney remakes that mistake visual fidelity for emotional resonance. It's got all the polish of a high-budget project, but none of the spirit. I didn't smile, I didn't cry - I just kept checking my watch.

Honestly? I'm at the point where I won't even bother watching the live-action remake of Moana, or whatever else they're churning out next. I'm so over the fakeness. These aren't love letters to our childhoods - they're boardroom products dressed up in nostalgia.

NO MORE. Let our animated classics stay classics. They don't need "updating." They just need to be left alone.

Firstly, there are some positives. Stitch still elicits some smiles because of his antics and the blend of cute behavior with devilish recklessness. The film looks nice, and some of the actors do a solid job. Throughout the movie, however, it becomes abundantly clear that this will never be equal to the original. It is an echo of something far better. People who make this argument are not merely trying to be sticklers. There is probably not a single new implementation that worked better than what the 2002 film chose to do. The pacing of the movie was problematic, and some of the choices regarding plot points lacked heart and gravitas. Like almost all of these live-action Disney remakes, it is a cash grab (in this circumstance, it is being rewarded unlike others that flopped critically and featured fans not turning out as expected). This review will not contain any spoilers. Yet, I do think I can make the case that if you were expecting the beautiful and rich message of "Ohana means family" being the axis upon which the movie turns you will be soundly disappointed. This movie does not have the noxious messaging that Disney has rightfully been pilloried for recently, and it is not a horrid film, but it is not going to have the grip on hearts and minds like the first film.