Taarzan: The Wonder Car
- 2004
- 2h 43min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,9/10
6 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Raj reconstruye el coche de su padre muerto y lo llama Tarzán, pero el coche llega a la vida de forma milagrosa. Poco a poco, el coche comienza a matar a los asesinos del padre de Raj.Raj reconstruye el coche de su padre muerto y lo llama Tarzán, pero el coche llega a la vida de forma milagrosa. Poco a poco, el coche comienza a matar a los asesinos del padre de Raj.Raj reconstruye el coche de su padre muerto y lo llama Tarzán, pero el coche llega a la vida de forma milagrosa. Poco a poco, el coche comienza a matar a los asesinos del padre de Raj.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 3 premios y 7 nominaciones en total
Rajpal Naurang Yadav
- Havaldar Sitaram
- (as Rajpal Yadav)
Reseñas destacadas
They are just a copy of ideas... nothing to watch.
Abbas-Mustan often known for copying English films comes up with a remake of CHRISTINE but sadly humanizes the car too much and adds a mystery of Ajay's soul in the car which is too old fashioned
The first half and all the college scenes are very badly handled, the leg scene of Ayesha and the car scene and all her skimpy outfits scenes are repulsive and actually don't go with what she says that she will never wear skimpy clothes, you know how much they lie?
Anywayz the car taking revenge part is interesting though filmy and the murder of Mukesh Tiwari is nicely handled but the rest murders are badly handled and with the hamming of the villains it's even worse
Actually the villains comes across as jokers esp Shakti, Sadashiv
The handling of the past Ajay Devgan's scenes are too in your face filmy and clichéd
Even the entire Pankaj Dheer scenes where he says he won't marry Ayesha to Vatsal and the entire climax is 80's style
Direction is faulty Music is good
Vatsal tries hard but fails to emote and comes across as struggling to hard Ayesha is good but irritates at times Ajay is as usual Mukesh Tiwari is decent Sadashiv, Deepak Shirke and Shakti ham like no day Gulshan irritates with his fund a Rajpal is funny at times, while Farida is as usual
The first half and all the college scenes are very badly handled, the leg scene of Ayesha and the car scene and all her skimpy outfits scenes are repulsive and actually don't go with what she says that she will never wear skimpy clothes, you know how much they lie?
Anywayz the car taking revenge part is interesting though filmy and the murder of Mukesh Tiwari is nicely handled but the rest murders are badly handled and with the hamming of the villains it's even worse
Actually the villains comes across as jokers esp Shakti, Sadashiv
The handling of the past Ajay Devgan's scenes are too in your face filmy and clichéd
Even the entire Pankaj Dheer scenes where he says he won't marry Ayesha to Vatsal and the entire climax is 80's style
Direction is faulty Music is good
Vatsal tries hard but fails to emote and comes across as struggling to hard Ayesha is good but irritates at times Ajay is as usual Mukesh Tiwari is decent Sadashiv, Deepak Shirke and Shakti ham like no day Gulshan irritates with his fund a Rajpal is funny at times, while Farida is as usual
10rpbjhwn
Re watched this movie after a long time and Enjoyed it like we used to enjoy in childhood. Don't know why it has such a low rating. Sometimes I can't understand why people have to show that they know everything and rate movies based on if it has some logic or not. Its a movie, even children know its not real.
Anyways, the effects in the movie were amazing for its time and everyone used to enjoy the movie, From children to Adults and we know the 2 biggest reasons ;).
I don't have anything else to write at the moment but I have to use atleast 600 words, so this paragraph is just for time pass. Feels like I am writing for an exam and have to complete 600 words. Lol. Childhood all over again.
Anyways, the effects in the movie were amazing for its time and everyone used to enjoy the movie, From children to Adults and we know the 2 biggest reasons ;).
I don't have anything else to write at the moment but I have to use atleast 600 words, so this paragraph is just for time pass. Feels like I am writing for an exam and have to complete 600 words. Lol. Childhood all over again.
This movie was made to showcase the car and the car seriously looks awesome. But the concept they choose to promote the car is wrong.
A car designer is killed by some cunning business men his car. Later his son rebuilds with new design. The man returns as a ghost, uses this car to take revenge.
Ideally there should have been 2 different stories made. One for showcasing car abilities like power, comfort, style etc and another for the concept of car driven by a ghost (2 movies). Why so? Please read..
The movie shows that car repairs itself, it goes sideways, does some acrobatic stunts. Of course that happens because of the ghost but then the actual abilities of the car get hidden. Also, car generates too much of smoke at very speed. Another movie was released just few days after this movie and promoted bikes(Dhoom). That movie became superhit but this movie was a disaster. The car didn't become famous as the movie didn't work. The movie concept is not ideal for promotion.
But the movie concept isn't bad. It has very high entertainment quotient. Then why the most didn't work? Because of illogical sequences and many loop holes.
Our hero is a college student who is struggling to meet his daily needs. His boss in garage is very strict and can deduct salary for any uninformed leave. But he finances our hero to build the car? Why? Emotions? Doesn't make sense. Then after making the car what our hero does? Starts roaming in the city in the car. No other use of that design. His garage boss also doesn't say anything. This is the biggest flaw in the story according to me.
Ideally our hero should have showcased that car to get some job as car designer. His financial situation would have been improved. Then only remaining scenes would have made sense.
There are many other loop holes that you can see on YouTube. Many people have pointed them.
If you ignore all these logical mistakes and watch the movie, you will enjoy it a lot. There isn't any dull moment in the movie.
The movie deserves only 3 stars but gave 1 extra star for that awesome car
A car designer is killed by some cunning business men his car. Later his son rebuilds with new design. The man returns as a ghost, uses this car to take revenge.
Ideally there should have been 2 different stories made. One for showcasing car abilities like power, comfort, style etc and another for the concept of car driven by a ghost (2 movies). Why so? Please read..
The movie shows that car repairs itself, it goes sideways, does some acrobatic stunts. Of course that happens because of the ghost but then the actual abilities of the car get hidden. Also, car generates too much of smoke at very speed. Another movie was released just few days after this movie and promoted bikes(Dhoom). That movie became superhit but this movie was a disaster. The car didn't become famous as the movie didn't work. The movie concept is not ideal for promotion.
But the movie concept isn't bad. It has very high entertainment quotient. Then why the most didn't work? Because of illogical sequences and many loop holes.
Our hero is a college student who is struggling to meet his daily needs. His boss in garage is very strict and can deduct salary for any uninformed leave. But he finances our hero to build the car? Why? Emotions? Doesn't make sense. Then after making the car what our hero does? Starts roaming in the city in the car. No other use of that design. His garage boss also doesn't say anything. This is the biggest flaw in the story according to me.
Ideally our hero should have showcased that car to get some job as car designer. His financial situation would have been improved. Then only remaining scenes would have made sense.
There are many other loop holes that you can see on YouTube. Many people have pointed them.
If you ignore all these logical mistakes and watch the movie, you will enjoy it a lot. There isn't any dull moment in the movie.
The movie deserves only 3 stars but gave 1 extra star for that awesome car
This movie is spelled as Taarzan, not Tarzan. I always used to subconsciously connect Taarzan movie with Tarzan but they are way different. Different like salt and sugar are. Tarzan or any of its asset has nothing to do with this Taarzan movie. This is one my childhood's best movies and not just me, more than me, my brother was addictively obsessed with this movie. The car used in Taarzan movie was just wow experience for that time. We felt all the big names-Bentley, BMW, etc falling behind this weird but favorite supercar. The movie was so good but unfortunately, Vatsal Sheth failed to do better projects apart from Hostel. Also in this movie, Taarzan is the name of that wonder car.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe car was supposed to be launched after the film but due to the failure of the film, it was never launched.
- PifiasAfter the murder of Mahesh Saxena, who is killed on the 1st of January, the inspector says that he met Saxena on the 'Chautha' of Kailash Chopra, who was killed on the 29th. However, Chautha is four days after death, which cannot happen between the 29th and the 1st.
- ConexionesReferences El diablo sobre ruedas (1971)
- Banda sonoraDil Se Judaa
Written by Sameer
Composed by Himesh Reshammiya
Performed by Kumar Sanu, Alka Yagnik and Jayesh Gandhi
Courtesy of Baba Music
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Taarzan: The Wonder Car?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Taarzan: The Wonder Car (2004) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde