El pato en el ring

Unlike many other reviewers on this website, I did not enjoy this short that much. Personally I found it too short, a little boring, plot-less and mediocre. I felt the animation was not worked on nearly as much as it could have been (unlike other Daffy episodes at the time) and I also found the slapstick a little overdone, especially as I expected something with hardly any slapstick in it all (like a lot of Daffy episodes at the time).

There were things I did like about it as well. The STYLE of animation for Daffy is one of my favoured ones and there also happen to be quite a few good gags on here. Also I quite like the referee, quite a nice jolly duck.

This short is mainly for those who prefer episodes with much Looney Tunes slapstick and the same sort of theme as episodes of the 50's and 60's and for people who like ALL Daffy Duck stuff.

I may have submitted quite a negative review, but don't forget some of you out there will enjoy this! ;-)

5 and a half out of ten.

Available on YouTube

'To Duck... Or Not To Duck (1943)' pairs the fast-talking Daffy Duck with the affable Elmer Fudd. The former wants to fight the latter mano-a-mano in a much 'fairer' setting than usual, opting for an odd boxing match that might just be rigged in his favour. The short really centres around this idea, even if it seems incredibly 'left field' when it's first introduced. Arguably, it's more entertaining before the boxing ring even comes into play, with Daffy's daft dialogue and Fudd's likeable apologies combining for a compelling dynamic. Still, the flick is constantly enjoyable and often quite funny, finding humour in both its visuals and its narrative. It ends on a nice note, too. 7/10

While the Daffy Duck of the `50s and `60s was funny, there is no beating the Daffy from the `30s and `40s and here is proof of that and who can forget the famous Daffy laugh which inspired the Woody Woodpecker laugh? I don't know if it was because of Woody that the Daffy laugh was absent in the `50s and `60s but I don't think so because both Woody Woodpecker and Daffy Duck were performed by Mel Blanc.

Something I've often wondered about is the term sportsman for a person who takes a powerful rifle or shotgun and fires at a defenseless creature. I'm not anti-hunting, just annoyed by that term. In this one, Daffy has had enough and decides to settle things with Elmer Fudd in the boxing ring. Daffy has a clear advantage and many cartoons that followed used some of the same bits. Elmer does get the last word.

Few of the Looney Tunes/Merrie Melodies shorts dealt with physical activities more hilariously than "To Duck... or Not to Duck", as over-energetic Daffy challenges gullible Elmer to a boxing match weighed heavily in his own favor. If you thought that the White Sox scandal of 1919 was screwed up, then you ain't seen nothing yet! Quite simply, it's the sort of thing that only Daffy could do. I noticed in one scene that Elmer's pants fell down and it looked like you could see his butt! They actually got that on screen in 1943! Of course, these cartoons were always looking for ways to push the limits. I'd better be certain of that or my name isn't Lee Eisenberg...and it isn't! (just kidding: it is)