Im Labyrinth des Schweigens

An agreeable and well-acted approach to a historically significant but little-known event. In Germany, 15 years after World War II, one young man forces an entire country to face its past. Set in Frankfurt, 1958, for the first time, the Germans judge the Germans. The young state prosecutor Johann Radmann - Alexander Fehling- finds some documents that allow him to launch a judicial process against some members of the SS who served in Auschwitz. But the horrors of the past and the hostility towards his work bring him close to collapse, as he finds it almost impossible to make his way through a labyrinth in which everyone seems to be involved or guilty. A young and ambitious prosecutor discovers how important German institutions and some members of the government are involved in a conspiracy whose purpose is to cover up the crimes of the Nazis during World War II (1939-1945).

This is the remarkable true story of the pursuit of justice for the victims of Auschwitz. An interesting and pleasant film with a lot of social content and good performances. Here we witness the struggle of a young prosecutor who, avoiding all kinds of obstacles from both higher authorities and other people who hide or wish to live in peace without problems, nevertheless manages to bring those guilty of heinous crimes to trial. This intelligent and attractive film, endowed with extreme honesty, without an iota of falsehood and a lot of courage was well directed by Giulio Ricciarelli. It got several prizes and nominations , such as: 20 Satellite Awards (International Press Academy), nominated Best international film. German Film Awards 2015 - films of 2014 nominated Best film, Best Supporting Actor (Gert Voss), Best Screenplay (Elisabeth Bartel, Giulio Ricciarelli), Best soundtrack (Niki Reiser, Sebastian Pille).

The Auschwitz trial began in 1963, 211 survivors of the Auscwitz concentration and extermination camp told their story. In the best trial in the history of the Federal Republic, 19 members of the SS who had served in Auscwitz appeared. 17 of the accused were convicted, during the 20 months that the trial lasted the accused did not show any repentance. Fritz Bauer died in 1978 from a myocardial infarction. Josef Mengeles lived in Brazil until his death in 1979, he died of a stroke while swimming. The trial marked a milestone in the history of the German Federal Republic, the crimes of the Nazi era could no longer be silenced. The film is taught to Attorney General Frtz Bauer, prosecutors Joachin Kugler, George Vogel, Gerhard Wiese and journalist Thomas Gnielka.

For years I've been watching films from the "Allies" point of view and I never thought of the German point of view or I just assumed German people knew of the atrocities committed by their fellow men.

Its amazing and heartbreaking to know that Germans actually didn't know or chose to not believe what the Nazis were doing to the Jews during WWII.

We were made to believe also that all the Nazis were living in hiding after WWII, when some of them were actually living in relative comfort and free from scrutiny, among some of the people they tortured.

Labyrinth of Lies is the film that gives us a look of how the Germans were actually living in denial for years after the war and how some of the Nazis that committed war crimes were living their normal lives as if nothing had happened.

Very interesting film and very easy to understand if you know the history.

It's 1958 Frankfurt, West Germany. Johann Radmann is a young by-the-books prosecutor toiling in traffic court and believing his father to be anti-Nazi. Reporter Thomas Gnielka brings the case of Charles Schulz, a teacher suspected of being a Nazi guard in Auschwitz. Nobody cares about what happened there and actively ignores the collective Nazi past. He starts a relationship with Marlene Wondrak. Gnielka introduces him to camp survivor Simon Kirsch. Radmann starts digging into the past and building a case against many. His main obsession is camp doctor Josef Mengele who experimented on the prisoners.

The history is very compelling. However, the story lacks danger or intensity. It needs some additional drama. There is some professional and personal drama but none of it is that intense. The production and acting is first rate. It is a very compelling watch although there are no big surprises.

"Labyrinth of Lies" (2014 release from Germany; original title "Im Labyrinth des Schweigens" or "In the Labyrinth of Silence" 122 min.) brings the story of the events leading up to the so-called Frankfurt Auschwitz trials in 1963. As the movie opens, we are told it is "Frankfurt-am-Main, 1958", and we get to know a young prosecutor named Johann Radmann, who is just starting his career, doing traffic violations. But soon he gets (and seizes) the opportunity to look into the case of a Waffen SS soldier who was a commander at Auschwitz and is now teaching in grade school as if nothing ever happened. Radmann soon finds that there is widespread resistance to his efforts to prosecute ex-Nazis. At this point, we are 15 minutes into the movie but to tell you more would spoil your viewing experience, you'll just have to see for yourself how it all plays out.

Couple of comments: this movie is an important reminder that the sentiment in Germany wasn't always what it is nowadays and has been for decades. It appears that after WW II, the entire country went about its business as if nothing had happened, and collectively tries to whitewash Auschwitz from memory. But as Radmann points out, "to remain silent is to poison our country's democracy". So he speaks up. It is an incredible story. Kudos to the movie's producers for bringing us this important historical reminder. Besides the important moral and historical aspects, the movie does a great job portraying what daily life in the late 50s and early 60s was in West Germany. Check out the great looking cars! "Labyrinth of Lies" was Germany's submission for this year's Best Foreign Language Movie Oscar nominations, which should give you an idea how well the movie was viewed in its home country (the fact that it didn't get the Oscar nomination doesn't diminish the merits of the movie).

"Labyrinth of Lies" was released over a year ago. I have no idea why it is just now finding its way into US theaters, but better late than never. The movie showed up this weekend at my local art-house theater here in Cincinnati, I figure this won't stick around for long. The Sunday matinée screening where I saw this at was surprisingly well attended, I am happy to report. If you are in the mood for a top-notch quality foreign movie that has a very important lesson and reminder, I urge you to check out "Labyrinth of Lies", be it in the theater, on Amazon Instant Video or eventually on DVD/Blu-ray. "Labyrinth of Lies" is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!

Nowadays, the word Auschwitz has become a synonym for the worst kind of human evil. But there was a time when, at least in Germany, nobody knew the word, let alone what happened there. In the years after the war, German society wanted to forget everything about this terrible period, including the atrocities committed.

'Im Labyrinth des Schweigens' (In the Labyrinth of Silence) shows how this period came to an end. A journalist presses charges against a former Auschwitz camp commander, who is now a school teacher. A prosecutor starts an investigation, but his efforts are obstructed by all kinds of procedures. It is clear that most Germans don't want to be confronted with the mass murders committed by their fellow compatriots. In one scene, the prosecutor asks his young colleagues what the word Auschwitz means to them. None of them come up with an answer.

The film clearly shows how complex the past was for post-war Germany. Lots of people had been a member of the National Socialist Party, without being a nazi by conviction. Some became a nazi because it was convenient to be part of the ruling power-base. The prosecutor learns that even some people who are very close to him, were on the wrong side of history. Still, he is convinced that the men who committed war crimes should be punished.

This is an interesting story about an unknown period in the German history. Unfortunately, the film maker decided to include a cheesy love story in the script. The prosecutor's love affair is distracting, unnecessary and predictable. Towards the end, there are too many side stories and subplots, and the film starts dragging on. At the same time, there are some very nice creative scenes. I particularly liked the scene without words, when the prosecutor starts interviewing the witnesses from the concentration camps. Small gestures and facial expressions show, better than any dialogue, the horror these people must have gone through.