I have seen the documentary about Nine Muses. I know enough about the K Pop industry to understand how grueling and exploitative it is. Do I like K Pop? Sure, some of it. Am I glad SK culture now spans the world, including cinema? Of course.
But giving Lee Soo Man all of the credit for basically making Korea culturally capitalist is a bit irritating, to say the least. This man has been accused of slavery contracts and over-profiting off of the blood, sweat and tears of teenagers and young adults. He's all Toxic Positivity, telling you how he prays to spread joy - while sitting on the piles of money he stole from desperate children who wanted to be singers or dancers.
King of K-Pop is very biased and romanticized. Yes, it mentions the slavery contracts and the level of hard work these young people face. Up to 7 years of training without a guarantee they'll ever be famous. Children as young as middle school giving up regular education for becoming a pop star. An early scandal with a young man taking meth to face the challenges of his demanding career. But it fluffs it up a bit, you know?
Lee Soo Man is pictured as this dreamer, this go-getter who just wanted to be a singer and spread South Korean culture throughout the world. Sure, we can give him some credit. But to give him all the credit is so absurd. I feel like the documentary could have certainly been more critical. I have a feeling many reviews will be 1 or 10 with angry K-Pop fans in the US overrating the documentary and ignoring the problematic parts.