IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,2/10
11.244
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Mutter versucht, ihrer missbräuchlichen Vergangenheit zu entkommen, indem sie in eine neue Stadt zieht, wo sie sich mit einer anderen Mutter anfreundet, die ihr gegenüber misstrauisch w... Alles lesenEine Mutter versucht, ihrer missbräuchlichen Vergangenheit zu entkommen, indem sie in eine neue Stadt zieht, wo sie sich mit einer anderen Mutter anfreundet, die ihr gegenüber misstrauisch wird.Eine Mutter versucht, ihrer missbräuchlichen Vergangenheit zu entkommen, indem sie in eine neue Stadt zieht, wo sie sich mit einer anderen Mutter anfreundet, die ihr gegenüber misstrauisch wird.
Sienna Soho
- Maddie
- (as Sienna Soho Baker)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I watched to the end. I didn't give up half-way though. That is all I can say about this movie. It is about how a woman insidiously worms herself into another's life slowly. The acting is acceptable. The plot is quite standard. Cage is old and fat, but more importantly, his acting is mediocre. Yes, I will watch it once.
This straight to DVD Nicolas Cage affair is certainly less "Actiony" than what we have grown accustomed to over the past few years. Rejoining Gina Gershon he delves into thriller territory and though the story has been done before they do a decent enough job.
What threw me was the initial swerve, the movie opens one way and quickly u-turns. When the twist came I'll be truthful I didn't expect it.
Also starring former WWE "Wrestler" (And I use that term very loosely) Eva Marie who I immediately mistook for a Kardashian. Credit where credit is due she put in a decent enough performance but being a wrestling fan I see her and I just see a train wreck.
Harmless enough feature which all comes together well in the end even if it does feel somewhat recycled.
The Good:
One Eva Marie scene that every WWE fan will appreciate
Gina Gershon
The Bad:
Eva Marie
Things I learnt from this movie:
Eva Marie is a better actress than a wrestler
Gina Gershon has access to the fountain of youth
What threw me was the initial swerve, the movie opens one way and quickly u-turns. When the twist came I'll be truthful I didn't expect it.
Also starring former WWE "Wrestler" (And I use that term very loosely) Eva Marie who I immediately mistook for a Kardashian. Credit where credit is due she put in a decent enough performance but being a wrestling fan I see her and I just see a train wreck.
Harmless enough feature which all comes together well in the end even if it does feel somewhat recycled.
The Good:
One Eva Marie scene that every WWE fan will appreciate
Gina Gershon
The Bad:
Eva Marie
Things I learnt from this movie:
Eva Marie is a better actress than a wrestler
Gina Gershon has access to the fountain of youth
With one exception every actor completely phones it in. Completely unimaginative directing, poor editing and very predictable.
Not worth 100 minutes of your life.
Let me first start out by saying....What happened to Nick Cage? I've always been a fan of his early work before he sold out to "the Big Hoolywood Production's", obviously for the $$. He has made some good films over the past 15-20 years, but his no nonsense, more guts then glory approach to his choice of films has died a long time ago. Also, he HAS to own a mirror in at least one of his 25? Homes. Does he see that hair transplants and plastic surgery has ruined his chances of aging gracefully and true to himself looking like a pulled on and stretched out hormonal mess? OK, I had to get that off my chest.
To give a fair and Short review of "Inconceivable", I have to first state this film is suspiciously much like a poor remake of "hand that rocks the cradle", a far superior movie. Of course, there are variations to the plot and story line, however, this is a newer version that attempts (and fails) to deliver an original story with a few more Sub Plots going on but at a VERY..SLOW.....PACE.......
For the guys out there that may see this film (myself included) there is plenty of "eye candy". A few decent gratuitous nude scenes and despite Gena Gershon's age, she still oozes sex appeal. To that end, the film is flimsy, predictable and disingenuous in its delivery. Things are wrapped up too neatly and although there is a very slight twist at the films end, I had predicted it 10 minutes before the truth was revealed.
The acting was sub par, the story, well, Boring. The characters sort of meander through their roles like they can't wait to get back to their respective trailers.
I gave this film a 5 because it was not a total waste of time. It did have some moments that were worth a continued look. But, it just kept crashing into walls every time it seemed it would pick up.
Nick, I see your pumping out four to five films a year over the past several years. I know you are a big believer in......"who ever dies with the most toys at the end, wins", but, for heavens sake, read a script before taking your next film. It seems the days of "leaving Las Vegas and Moonstruck" are 25 years in your rear mirror. Despite uncle Francis getting you into the film industry, I was and always have been a fan of your work. Then you made "face off" and it was pretty much down hill from there.
This is an OK film and even better if you haven't seen "Hand that Rocks the Cradle". But, if you do watch this and have a chance to view "HTRTC", you be the judge. The latter is much much better and very similar.
To give a fair and Short review of "Inconceivable", I have to first state this film is suspiciously much like a poor remake of "hand that rocks the cradle", a far superior movie. Of course, there are variations to the plot and story line, however, this is a newer version that attempts (and fails) to deliver an original story with a few more Sub Plots going on but at a VERY..SLOW.....PACE.......
For the guys out there that may see this film (myself included) there is plenty of "eye candy". A few decent gratuitous nude scenes and despite Gena Gershon's age, she still oozes sex appeal. To that end, the film is flimsy, predictable and disingenuous in its delivery. Things are wrapped up too neatly and although there is a very slight twist at the films end, I had predicted it 10 minutes before the truth was revealed.
The acting was sub par, the story, well, Boring. The characters sort of meander through their roles like they can't wait to get back to their respective trailers.
I gave this film a 5 because it was not a total waste of time. It did have some moments that were worth a continued look. But, it just kept crashing into walls every time it seemed it would pick up.
Nick, I see your pumping out four to five films a year over the past several years. I know you are a big believer in......"who ever dies with the most toys at the end, wins", but, for heavens sake, read a script before taking your next film. It seems the days of "leaving Las Vegas and Moonstruck" are 25 years in your rear mirror. Despite uncle Francis getting you into the film industry, I was and always have been a fan of your work. Then you made "face off" and it was pretty much down hill from there.
This is an OK film and even better if you haven't seen "Hand that Rocks the Cradle". But, if you do watch this and have a chance to view "HTRTC", you be the judge. The latter is much much better and very similar.
I rarely write reviews but I feel obligated to give one because it was the reviews that I gave this movie a chance.
First of all, what twist? The plot was so obvious and predictable. I was not surprised whatsoever at any point of the movie. Second, the story was not realistic in my opinion. The characters behave in a stupid way most of the time which made it hard for me to associate with any of them. The husband is way too unsupportive and still portrayed to be a good one at the end.
So, in short, if you enjoy only very well written and directed, realistic movies with real twists, stay away from this one!
First of all, what twist? The plot was so obvious and predictable. I was not surprised whatsoever at any point of the movie. Second, the story was not realistic in my opinion. The characters behave in a stupid way most of the time which made it hard for me to associate with any of them. The husband is way too unsupportive and still portrayed to be a good one at the end.
So, in short, if you enjoy only very well written and directed, realistic movies with real twists, stay away from this one!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe first time in 20 years that you see Gina and Nic Cage on screen together since 1997 Face/Off
- PatzerAt about 12 minutes, when she's taking pics, she's got her fingers over the lenses.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Midnight Screenings: The Book of Henry (2017)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Inconceivable?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Inconceivable
- Drehorte
- Indian Hill, Ohio, USA(street scenes)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 10.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 259.635 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 45 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Tödliches Verlangen (2017) officially released in India in English?
Antwort