The Dragons of Camelot

Being a big sword and fantasy fan, as well as being a fan of anything to do with King Arthur or Dragons I had to give this a look. It's not great, the budget must have been fairly small, the story is pretty formulaic, and it's pretty clear where things are going, and the characters thinly drawn, though the actors seemed to be doing the best with what they had. The battle scenes are basic, though I thought the final battle was quite lively. There were some nice looking castles showcased and I thought the Dragon CGI was pretty successful, though it's a shame they didn't have the budget to give them more to do. So kind of cheesy, but if you're a fantasy fan, it's okay way to pass 80 minutes if you don't expect too much.

Nonsensical film editing, they've put together frames that don't work together at all jump from wide angles to close shots, from static to handheld. If you don't watch it as a movie, but just to be amazed at on how bad it is, then it's fun . Acting awful too. And villager's'clothes and streets and hairstyles are way too clean and new, they look like made of felt.

Its just so bad. Feel sorry for the actors. Got nothing else to say but haven't met the minimom characters. So repeat: nonsensical film editing, they've put together frames that don't work together at all, jump from wide angles to close shots, from static to handheld. If you don't watch it as a movie, but just to be amazed at on how bad it is, then it's fun . Acting awful too. And villager's'clothes and streets and hairstyles are way too clean and new, they look like made of felt.

This would have have to be one of the worst movies i have ever wasted my time watching. The battle scenes ? 12 people on each side. Was the budget for this film $100 or less.

Don't waste your time on this,The acting is awful and no name stars. Why do people waste money making such Crap.

The cgi looks like someone cut and pasted Castles onto pictures in the background.The editing is also dreadful.

Please watch something else, don't waste you time on this film. If the actors got paid for this it was a scam. The sets looked like they where made of Foam rubber. Just awful.

It's rather shocking how pedestrian everything here is, considering they had an established Hollywood blockbuster director.

Not sure you want to learn about Camelot by way of this movie. So while the filmmaker might have chosen more wisely how and where to spend the little money he had (maybe it's the only story they gave him money for on the other hand), it's still a very low budget movie. So do not expect polished special effects or anything like that.

There is a lot of over the top "acting" (if you can call it that), one not being able to act if his life (or that of the character he's portraying for that matter) depended on it - literally. The props are not really good either, but you can't blame them for trying. People do get killed in a sort of graphic way (there is blood "spilled", digital that is). Even if sometimes you get a bit of nostalgia with this trying to tap into 80s movies and their "group on a mission" mentality it never achieves that.