IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,4/10
1158
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn American tourist unknowingly becomes an object of obsession as she searches for her kidnapped best friend in Thailand.An American tourist unknowingly becomes an object of obsession as she searches for her kidnapped best friend in Thailand.An American tourist unknowingly becomes an object of obsession as she searches for her kidnapped best friend in Thailand.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 33 Gewinne & 15 Nominierungen insgesamt
Caitlin Stryker
- Jewel
- (as Caitlin Cromwell)
Jon Flores
- Dude #2
- (as Jon Florez)
Jose L. Lopez
- Club Delivery Guy
- (as Jose Lopez)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I had to give it one star because zero isn't an option. Really don't know what to say except what a waste of time, watch a bunch of backpackers on an island in Thailand trying to make a scary low budget B movie. Classified as a holiday adventure would be more accurate. I've no idea what the movie is trying to be or say. Avoid. 0/10
The acting from the very first moment to the scene with the guy banging the blonde in the bed at the start was utterly atrocious I began to think maybe it was a comedy horror - - I can only assume they were working for free to give their acting portfolios a boost or was this a student film?
It actually gives the impression that 4 or 5 friends went on holiday to Thailand and on the first day decided to make a horror movie as they visited various locations for a sunbathe and smoke a few spliffs - unfortunately the spliffs must have gone to their heads as it was like watching paint dry and it did turn out to be a horror of a movie!
Nothing much happens, the whole thing was pointless. Even the ideas were ripped off from other movies like saw.
The acting destroyed the movie right from the off. Its yet another ripoff but its not worth your time - really just avoid this and watch the much better film "GHOST HOUSE".
It actually gives the impression that 4 or 5 friends went on holiday to Thailand and on the first day decided to make a horror movie as they visited various locations for a sunbathe and smoke a few spliffs - unfortunately the spliffs must have gone to their heads as it was like watching paint dry and it did turn out to be a horror of a movie!
Nothing much happens, the whole thing was pointless. Even the ideas were ripped off from other movies like saw.
The acting destroyed the movie right from the off. Its yet another ripoff but its not worth your time - really just avoid this and watch the much better film "GHOST HOUSE".
1. Horrible acting. 2. Not scary at all. 3. Story is badly paced and stupid. Don't waste your time on this garbage. It stinks! There's absolutely no redeeming quality about this amateur movie. The clowns were just stupid looking. Just looks awful. Anyone giving this more than one star is obviously benefiting from the production of this badly made film. Probably friends of the cast members. Avoid this movie!
It's a waste of time. I watch low-budget films but this story was just crap, somehow. Acting was no different. Like they all just went for a holiday and decided to make a film for fun.
All about Thailand but I think they were also in the Philippines. Couldn't help notice the background voices..
All about Thailand but I think they were also in the Philippines. Couldn't help notice the background voices..
This little doozy makes me wish the videocamera had never been invented. But I'll say this for Bradley Stryker. He knows how to get his vacations paid for. This shot-on-video dreck is 98% amateur travel footage -- the kind of home movie a proud 1950s camera-owning suburbanite might have forced his friends and neighbors to sit through -- with 2% "horror" slapped on in order to market it to suckers.
If you're expecting another "Hostel" (or anything close to it) get that thought out of your head. This is more like a PG-rated travel video shot by Uwe Boll.
The "scary" stuff features a threatening clown-masked villain with a filtered voice -- to say he's a poor man's version of Jigsaw from Saw would be an insult to poor men. The rest of this video venture is footage of the actors dancing at raves, wandering the streets or lounging on the beaches of Thailand.
I'm embarrassed to say I fell for the ruse -- I kept watching, waiting for something of substance to develop. It was like watching a house slowly burn, waiting for the walls to give way and the roof to finally collapse. There are a few pretty actresses but don't expect much if you're looking for T'n'A, and you'll still be disappointed.
The ending is predictable and entirely anti-climactic. Writer-director Stryker hasn't a clue how to build suspense or tell a proper story. The videography is nice, taking advantage of the plethora of dayglo backdrops and lush beauty of the country, like any competent travel piece would.
Adding to the torture is the music. Stryker managed to dig up some of the most annoying songs ever recorded for this opus. The two at the end are particularly heinous, one meant to be ironic (Baby Girl) and the other a children's bubblegum ditty called Boom Boom something-or-other that cannot be adequately described with mere words.
Perhaps the worst thing of all is the end credit sequence, which takes us to a new location. Obviously our Aussie auteur has plans for a sequel.
If you're expecting another "Hostel" (or anything close to it) get that thought out of your head. This is more like a PG-rated travel video shot by Uwe Boll.
The "scary" stuff features a threatening clown-masked villain with a filtered voice -- to say he's a poor man's version of Jigsaw from Saw would be an insult to poor men. The rest of this video venture is footage of the actors dancing at raves, wandering the streets or lounging on the beaches of Thailand.
I'm embarrassed to say I fell for the ruse -- I kept watching, waiting for something of substance to develop. It was like watching a house slowly burn, waiting for the walls to give way and the roof to finally collapse. There are a few pretty actresses but don't expect much if you're looking for T'n'A, and you'll still be disappointed.
The ending is predictable and entirely anti-climactic. Writer-director Stryker hasn't a clue how to build suspense or tell a proper story. The videography is nice, taking advantage of the plethora of dayglo backdrops and lush beauty of the country, like any competent travel piece would.
Adding to the torture is the music. Stryker managed to dig up some of the most annoying songs ever recorded for this opus. The two at the end are particularly heinous, one meant to be ironic (Baby Girl) and the other a children's bubblegum ditty called Boom Boom something-or-other that cannot be adequately described with mere words.
Perhaps the worst thing of all is the end credit sequence, which takes us to a new location. Obviously our Aussie auteur has plans for a sequel.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesLand of Smiles is a popular term referred to Thailand because thais have thirteen ways to express something through smiles.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Land of Smiles?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Land of Smiles
- Drehorte
- Thailand(location)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 30 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 16:9 HD
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen